"We will kill 9/11 CT skeptics after 9/11 Truth comes out."

[Gravy]

"confusion in the moinds of others"

I received a pm expressing concern about people who may threaten me. I haven't received a truther threat in ages, and the few truther emails I get tend to be sad, often incoherent rants. Here's one from today (naughty words bleeped):

Mark, I read your 9/11 article and on page 16 under your heading question WHAT REALLY HAPPENED AT WTC Building & on 9/11? I read and re-read your answer. Wow! What absolute horsebleep!

All you have is NIST and Chief Daniel Nigro? NIST is a government agency! And, your boy Chief Nigro worked for Mayor Rudy Giuliani, right? Well, if you believe Giuliani was not involved in this crime you really are a stupid bastard.

Your first mistake, you gullible criminal enabler, is believing ANYTHING NIST tells you. It's like believing the FDA is honest, or that The Pentagon never cooks the books, or that George W. Bush is not a liar and homosexual, or that Osama Bin Laden was the mastermind of the 9/11 crime.

Mark, I can't believe you are THIS naive. Therefore, I honestly believe you are part of the cover up.

Your horsebleep article says that fire officials and chief Nigro decided to evacuate WTC 7 at about 2:30 PM because of the severe damage and severely uncontrollable fires. Therefore NOBODY did anything after that INSIDE WTC 7, right? RIGHT!

Well, then, Einstein, how did the building manage to fall so fbleeping beautifully, virtually straight down into its own footprint, at nearly free-fall speed with NOBODY doing anything to make it happen that way? Mark, you are a master BULLbleep ARTIST.

"That's certainly straightforward enough", you said, as if that, in and of itself, is overwhelming proof and EVIDENCE to support your horsebleep claims that the building just COLLAPSED all by itself?

Mark, you are one sick and twisted assbleep to go around spreading this bullbleep. If you are not part of this coverup, then you are the most naive, gullible, and biggest assbleep in existence for spreading such garbage and creating doubt and confusion in the moinds of others.

In more honest times, when the media wasn't totally controlled and we still had a few honest politicians, judges, and law enforcement officials, Assbleeps like you would have been put to death for TREASON!

You are a disgraceful assbleep and TRAITOR, in my opinion...or either the mmost gullible, naive, a DORKY assbleep on the face of the Earth.

My reply:

Hello, Bruce.

Putting aside your bizarre spasms of paranoia and invective, I note that you didn't point out, with evidence, anything that me or the many NIST reports get wrong. Congratulations on achieving par on the truther course, which will avail you exactly nothing, ever.

Good luck with your psychological troubles,

Mark

 

[J. Wellington Wimpy]

Mark, I can't believe you are THIS naive.

Evidently, that's just about the only thing he is constitutionally incapable of believing, however.

Always a pleasure to "see" you again, Mark!

 

[oldhat]

Death to the DORKY assbleeps.

 

[Audible Click]

-sigh- Now you're insulting Zombies and lunatics.

 

[Minadin]

Here are a bunch for Gravy.
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/semiliterateparanoiacswhofantasizeaboutt

There were some on there I hadn't seen before.

I think Gravy should change his forum title to 'farts chemtrails' because I found this quote hilarious:

Well in that case, Gravy is Gravy's handler. Gravy is everywhere. Gravy is the NWO. Gravy farts chemtrails. Gravy shoots holographic planes from his eyes. You cannot escape Gravy. Gravy can plant explosives simply by crossing his forearms and sharply nodding his head. He will get you. It is only a matter of time.

(I'm 99% certain that the above was facetious)

 

[NWO Sentryman]

I received a pm expressing concern about people who may threaten me. I haven't received a truther threat in ages, and the few truther emails I get tend to be sad, often incoherent rants. Here's one from today (naughty words bleeped):




My reply:

Welcome back, Gravy.

 

[twinstead]

Hey. DORKY assbleeps ROCK!

 

[NoZed Avenger]

George Bush is homosexual?

How exactly does tha-

You know, nevermind. Just. . . just nevermind.




I'm sorry I mentioned it.

 

[T.A.M.]

Mark, if you get a chance, I PMed you yesterday about something...

TAM

 

[atecom]

"Your first mistake, you gullible criminal enabler, is believing ANYTHING NIST tells you."

Well at least he admits his preconceived ideas.

 

[Pantaz]

Here's one from today (naughty words bleeped):

Looks like that might have come from someone we know...

I checked out Mark Roberts' information regarding WTC 7 and then contacted him to let him know how incredibly gullible he is. The only sources he uses are clearly criminals, paid off by our corrupt government. Sources like NIST, Popular Mechanics, anyone and everyone connected with Giuliani's office are certainly not to be trusted. It's like asking George W. Bush to tell us the truth about it.

OK, enough about the gullible nature of the absolute immature and naive people who believe such incredible lies, let's assume Mark Roberts story that WTC 7 was actually pulled down by the FDNY, OK?

At some point before 5:20 PM, when WTC 7 actually collapsed so neatly and perfectly into its own footprint, orders had to be given to the people actually responsible for pulling the building, right? Of course. And Mark assumes this order was given about 3 hours before 5:20 PM, right?

Let's say the order was given 5 hours before 5:20PM. My question is, how did these guys manage to enter this burning building and do all the work necessary to make this building collapse so PERFECTLY, in only a few hours?

Mark says the building didn't fall at free fall speed. He says it took 13.5 seconds, not 6-7 seconds. The eyes can deceive you, just ask James Randi.
However, I still do not know how they managed to make the building fall so beautifully and "CONTROLLED-LIKE", only having several hours to prepare the building.

That's why I believe the entire DEBUNKER argument is a load of crap. It's all based on totally unreliable sources, lacks reason, and defies the laws of physics. It's a load of garbage, just like Darwin's Theory of Evolution.

 

[jaydeehess]

George Bush is homosexual?

How exactly does tha-

You know, nevermind. Just. . . just nevermind.




I'm sorry I mentioned it.

Oh, that's a common belief in many conspiracy circles. Guliani is also homosexual don't you know?

 

[abenja1]

Another thread that has nothing to do with the crimes of 911.
You guys use this tactic as a way to attack the arguer instead of the argument.
Why cant there just be a forum that deals with that day and have another forum that is directly about Conspiracy Theorists?

And once again Tweeter proves the human garbage that he is.

 

[NickUK]

Goodbye Scurvy Gherkin, hello Dorky Assbleep!

 

[leftysergeant]

Well, to be on the safe side, since I have about 10000 riubds if 7,62X54R and about 5000 rounds of '06, I suppose I should go ahead and see if I can find a good deal on .303 and 7.92, maybe a few hundred more rounds of .32 ACP and 9mm.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

Oh, that's a common belief in many conspiracy circles. Guliani is also homosexual don't you know?

I've never really understood the need for certain whackjobs to claim everyone, or even anyone, in power is a homosexual, as if being gay is one of the Pillars of Pure Evil™.

Latent homophobia? Fundamental Christianity? Or just a need to psychologically shock the "sheep" by trying to apply every socially negative attribute imaginable?

 

[Horatius]

... as if being gay is one of the Pillars of Pure Evil™.

"As if"?

Latent homophobia? Fundamental Christianity? Or just a need to psychologically shock the "sheep" by trying to apply every socially negative attribute imaginable?

I suspect that's not an "or" situation.

 

[JoeyDonuts]

Well, to be on the safe side, since I have about 10000 riubds if 7,62X54R and about 5000 rounds of '06, I suppose I should go ahead and see if I can find a good deal on .303 and 7.92, maybe a few hundred more rounds of .32 ACP and 9mm.

That reminds me of something funny I read the other day.

Apparently, there is no law preventing a private citizen from owning a minigun.

Doesn't really need to be one, since you'd need to be a multi-millionaire to afford the gun, not to mention the thousands of rounds of linked ammo. So, unless Warren Buffet and Steve Jobs start tearing up Dodge City with a couple truck-mounted GAU-17s, I don't see the legislation keeping pace.

 

[Tweeter]

Well, to be on the safe side, since I have about 10000 riubds if 7,62X54R and about 5000 rounds of '06, I suppose I should go ahead and see if I can find a good deal on .303 and 7.92, maybe a few hundred more rounds of .32 ACP and 9mm.

You sound like one of those guys from WACO. But anyways its good to know where to find ammo when the shtf.

 

[BigAl]

That reminds me of something funny I read the other day.

Apparently, there is no law preventing a private citizen from owning a minigun.

Doesn't really need to be one, since you'd need to be a multi-millionaire to afford the gun, not to mention the thousands of rounds of linked ammo. So, unless Warren Buffet and Steve Jobs start tearing up Dodge City with a couple truck-mounted GAU-17s, I don't see the legislation keeping pace.

More precisely, you can own anything that is human-powered. That rules out a modern Gat. To my mind, even funnier than the cost issues. (If I won the lottery, I'd spend some time at one of the public machine-gun events that are held around this great country.)

There is a thriving industry of DYI hand-powered mini-gun plans and kits.

http://www.gatlingguns.net/​