Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
beachnut said:
You posted dirt dumb rant from a neoNAZI hate site and you repeat and post idiotic ideas that are shared by the idiots who are neoNAZIs. It seems the dirt dumb dolts who are neoNAZIs produce the kind of dumbed down lies and delusions you love to repeat freely and without hesitation.

You posted web sites that blame Jews for 911. I find your anti-intellectual support for neoNAZI ideas to be troubling and indicative of your posting stupid ideas without evidence.

Why do you support the moronic delusions from neoNAZIs?
Click to expand...

What about this then....?

In this new 9/11 movie at the 1:20:00 mark the FBI make a statement that the 'dancing Israelis' were already filming WTC1 before the first plane arrived
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4874421830690006054&hl=en new movie

And in this clip at the 1:37 mark we have one of the 'dancing Isrealis'' on a talk show in Isreal saying tht they were there to 'document the event'
. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw talk show

So if you put these two things together you can say that the israelis were here to document the events of 9/11 because they knew the exact time and date of at least the first attack IN ADVANCE.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
What about this then....?

In this new 9/11 movie at the 1:20:00 mark the FBI make a statement that the 'dancing Israelis' were already filming WTC1 before the first plane arrived
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE_tuWKsBko new movie

And in this clip at the 1:37 mark we have one of the 'dancing Isrealis'' on a talk show in Isreal saying tht they were there to 'document the event'
. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw talk show

So if you put these two things together you can say that the israelis were here to document the events of 9/11 because they knew the exact time and date of at least the first attack IN ADVANCE.
Click to expand...

wow
you guys need a listening comprehension course
they decided to document the event after it was clear it was a terror attack
 
bill smith said:
What about this then....?

In this new 9/11 movie at the 1:20:00 mark the FBI make a statement that the 'dancing Israelis' were already filming WTC1 before the first plane arrived
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4874421830690006054&hl=en new movie

And in this clip at the 1:37 mark we have one of the 'dancing Isrealis'' on a talk show in Isreal saying tht they were there to 'document the event'
. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw talk show

So if you put these two things together you can say that the israelis were here to document the events of 9/11 because they knew the exact time and date of at least the first attack IN ADVANCE.
Click to expand...
So you do support the moronic idea of neoNAZIs. Good for you. You repeat failed ideas and you are blaming the Jews for 911 like your neoNAZI dummies.
 
Justin39640 said:
wow
you guys need a listening comprehension course
they decided to document the event after it was clear it was a terror attack
Click to expand...

What about the FBI saying that they were already filming WTC1 before the arrival of the first plane ?
 
bill smith said:
What about this then....?

In this new 9/11 movie at the 1:20:00 mark the FBI make a statement that the 'dancing Israelis' were already filming WTC1 before the first plane arrived
Click to expand...
We covered this only a couple of weeks or so ago. As I pointed out then, the FBI made no such statement. The comment in the film comes from Robert Baer, who doesn't say where it came from. What we do know is that the witness Maria, who say them on top of the van, said she saw them park after she started looking at the towers.

And yet, not a word of this had any effect on Bill, who comes out with precisely the same false information as though it had never been mentioned before. A perfect illustration of the utter pointlessness of debating truthers.
 
MikeW said:
We covered this only a couple of weeks or so ago. As I pointed out then, the FBI made no such statement. The comment in the film comes from Robert Baer, who doesn't say where it came from. What we do know is that the witness Maria, who say them on top of the van, said she saw them park after she started looking at the towers.

And yet, not a word of this had any effect on Bill, who comes out with precisely the same false information as though it had never been mentioned before. A perfect illustration of the utter pointlessness of debating truthers.
Click to expand...

Did I say Robert was an FBI agent ? Tut tut....i should have said CIA agent.
 
bill smith said:
Did I say Robert was an FBI agent ?
Click to expand...
No, you said the FBI made a statement. You overstated it to make it seem more impressive. Just as you did when you cut and pasted the same information in a previous post:

In this new 9/11 movie at the 1:20:00 mark the FBI make a statement that the 'dancing Israelis' were already filming WTC1 before the first plane arrived
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...90006054&hl=en new movie

And in this clip at the 1:37 mark we have one of the 'dancing Isrealis'' on a talk show in Isreal saying tht they were there to 'document the event'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw talk show

So if you put these two things together you can say that the israelis were here to document the events of 9/11 because they knew the exact time and date of at least the first attack IN ADVANCE.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4595652&postcount=2426
Click to expand...

I told you back then that the FBI said no such thing, but just like most truthers, you can't bear to throw an argument away, even if it's entirely false. And so a little while later, out comes the same misleading statement. How dishonest.
 
MikeW said:
And yet, not a word of this had any effect on Bill, who comes out with precisely the same false information as though it had never been mentioned before. A perfect illustration of the utter pointlessness of debating truthers.
Click to expand...


He may, in fact, have a learning disability or suffer from minor senility.
 
MikeW said:
No, you said the FBI made a statement. You overstated it to make it seem more impressive. Just as you did when you cut and pasted the same information in a previous post:



I told you back then that the FBI said no such thing, but just like most truthers, you can't bear to throw an argument away, even if it's entirely false. And so a little while later, out comes the same misleading statement. How dishonest.
Click to expand...

Just minor details Mike. But the story is true and credible which is what's really important.
 
bill smith said:
Just minor details Mike. But the story is true and credible which is what's really important.
Click to expand...
I don't think your dishonesty is a minor detail at all. But I can understand why you would want to gloss over that. Cut and paste some more lies, Bill. Perhaps they will distract people.
 
MikeW said:
I don't think your dishonesty is a minor detail at all. But I can understand why you would want to gloss over that. Cut and paste some more lies, Bill. Perhaps they will distract people.
Click to expand...

Well I dont usually bother playing these games but shall we analyse what you said about Maria seeing them park the van after she started looking at the Towers ? Don't run off now.No need to be shy.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Well I dont usually bother playing these games but shall we analyse what you said about Maria seeing them park the van after she started looking at the Towers ? Don't run off now.No need to be shy.
Click to expand...
Still no acknowledgement of your dishonesty, just another attempt at distraction.

But the thing is, why should I spend another minute on you? We've discussed this before (and as I've written more on 9/11 than most, I don't think anyone could call me "shy"). But now I know you don't only make mistakes, but you also learn nothing from people pointing them out, and cut and paste the same fiction later, it's clear that talking to you is an exercise in futility. So no, I'm not going to play your worthless games. Take your lies elsewhere, I'm no longer interested.
 
MikeW said:
Still no acknowledgement of your dishonesty, just another attempt at distraction.

But the thing is, why should I spend another minute on you? We've discussed this before (and as I've written more on 9/11 than most, I don't think anyone could call me "shy"). But now I know you don't only make mistakes, but you also learn nothing from people pointing them out, and cut and paste the same fiction later, it's clear that talking to you is an exercise in futility. So no, I'm not going to play your worthless games. Take your lies elsewhere, I'm no longer interested.
Click to expand...

That's why I don't even bother with bill smith anymore. I'm pretty sure it's a bot that's a conglomeration of every truther site and is designed to throw out cut & paste responses and youtube videos when it encounters certain keywords. Try it sometime if you think I'm kidding.
 
MikeW said:
Still no acknowledgement of your dishonesty, just another attempt at distraction.

But the thing is, why should I spend another minute on you? We've discussed this before (and as I've written more on 9/11 than most, I don't think anyone could call me "shy"). But now I know you don't only make mistakes, but you also learn nothing from people pointing them out, and cut and paste the same fiction later, it's clear that talking to you is an exercise in futility. So no, I'm not going to play your worthless games. Take your lies elsewhere, I'm no longer interested.
Click to expand...

Well I was only going to point out that you were out-and-put lying about the Maria thing.I can prove it too if you want. Best not to throw stones if you know what I mean.
Me ?....I never lie knowingly on the forums.The only reason I have not taken what you have had to say on board is becuse I have not found it persuasive. You can pull up any anrument we have had if you like and show the folks.
 
bill smith said:
Well I dont usually bother playing these games but shall we analyse what you said about Maria seeing them park the van after she started looking at the Towers ? Don't run off now.No need to be shy.
Click to expand...

please do, I would be interested to see which bits of the 20/20 transcript you feel are incorrect, why, and what evidence you have to prove they are incorrect.

Go.

TAM:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom