Naudet Documentary On Google Video

So this was the infamous Naudet thread from last year? Only 20 posts and nothing original?

I'm flabbergasted.

I've watched this film several times. In fact, I was just like mackey, gravy and 911 files. I had debunking truthers condensed into an art form.

Oh, but my eyes were opened by this flick. I strongly suggest that everyone go and rewatch it. Not the goofy little youtube crap resolution version, but the Special Edition DVD.

Get some popcorn and your favorite beverage and see if you get it. After 8 years the JREFers need a refresher course.
 
The show aired on NATIONAL TV a couple of years ago, in VERY CLEAR version.



Have you contacted the NAudet Bros? Im sure they are happy to deal with people who call them shills.
 
I don't have a wagon large enough to carry the beef I have with it. I am interested in your take on it. What did you think?
 
I don't have a wagon large enough to carry the beef I have with it. I am interested in your take on it. What did you think?

It's a great, albeit very disturbing, film.

Can you name just one beef?
 
So it's a great film in your book? I agree.

What is it about the film that makes it great to you?
 
I noticed Dr Judy Wood is also using the Naudet doc as part of the 'proof' no planes hit the towers.
Heard that one recently.

also see my recent thread on Dr. Wood.

Kreel, are you a Judy Wood devotee or more of the Steven Jones type? Which version of woo suits you best? Either way, feel free to post on that thread regarding the pros and cons (frozen prawns, as I like to say) of her theories if you like.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4723023#post4723023
 
Don't answer that. It's likely you have forgotten much of what was in the movie as several posters have already admitted. I suggest watching it again with your eyes open.
 
KReel, stop pussying around. I've seen it several times, and dont know what it is you find wrong with it.

CUT TO THE CHASE already. Tell us what you find wrong with it.


Jeez. a four year old doesn't play these kinds of stupid games.
 
Don't answer that. It's likely you have forgotten much of what was in the movie as several posters have already admitted. I suggest watching it again with your eyes open.

Maybe a rephrasing.... What about the movie opened your eyes?
 
KReel, stop pussying around. I've seen it several times, and dont know what it is you find wrong with it.

CUT TO THE CHASE already. Tell us what you find wrong with it.


Jeez. a four year old doesn't play these kinds of stupid games.

Kreel, in his expert opinion, feels the Naudet brothers, as filmmakers making a documentary about rookie firefighters in NYC, captured to much of the key video that he feels we use to make up our minds about 9/11 with, for it to be just coincidence.

ie. he thinks, get ready for it, that the Naudet brothers were OPs, planted to make sure the attack was captured on video.

I know, I know, but what can you do....

TAM:)
 
The rookie firefighter angle was a ruse. Their movements were rehearsed and planned for years. These guys embedded themselves at Duane St. and got ready for the big day.

Propaganda at its finest.

After viewing this film several times I've concluded that:

These guys aren't related. Their names aren't really Naudet, and I seriously doubt if they are even french. They were recruited as teenagers, with "911" being their lifes' work.

Watch the interview linked in the first post. They have nervous deceit written all over their faces.
 
These guys aren't related. Their names aren't really Naudet, and I seriously doubt if they are even french. They were recruited as teenagers, with "911" being their lifes' work.

On what basis do you claim that evidence-free assertion?
Did you do any research on them? Did you ask the Tisch School of Arts? Did you talk to Tony Benetatos? Did you talk to Jules' wife? Did you talk to James Hanlon?
 
Last edited:
Kreel is trolling, people. Just put him on ignore.
No.

The rookie firefighter angle was a ruse. Their movements were rehearsed and planned for years. These guys embedded themselves at Duane St. and got ready for the big day.

Propaganda at its finest.

After viewing this film several times I've concluded that:

These guys aren't related. Their names aren't really Naudet, and I seriously doubt if they are even french. They were recruited as teenagers, with "911" being their lifes' work.

Watch the interview linked in the first post. They have nervous deceit written all over their faces.

Kreel,
What evidence do you have that they were in any kind of rehearsals, etc beforehand? Do you know of any gas in their traceable history, where they weren't at the colleges or in the towns they were supposed to be in, for example? Do you have evidence that their birth certificates etc have been faked? Do you have evidence of who they really are, or where they were really born?

On what, precisely, do you stake such a claim?
 

Back
Top Bottom