Top Ten Photos 9/11 Conspiracy Nuts Hate

Here's a couple pics of the Shanksville crash site of Flt 93. Just to set them up, someone challenged me (comments on one of my youtube videos) saying that the 'crash scar' was already there in a 1994 USGS aerial photo, so that 'proved' Flt 93 was a fake crash.

I dug up these pictures on Killtown's website (of all places!!) They show clearly that the 1994 scar was in a different location with a different orientation from the 1991 crash site. I don't think the strip mine scar is even visible in the later photo, probably grown over with vegetation.

To the credit of the fellow who contacted me, He didn't persist after I sent him links to these. I told him that he had fallen for a hoax, so could be forgiven for the misunderstanding.



 
Last edited:
Slag dont roll that way!

this ones unpopular with truthers as well. Especially when they claim that slag can't form on the outside of a column because (as they claim) columns are always torched from the outside

burnthrough.jpg
 
BigAl - You hit on the ONE part I DO want to know; How involved were the Saudi Royals in this? I hope Obama knows the answer, and that he bases policy accordingly.

And it doesn't change the basic story and knowing or not knowing the serial number on a part doesn't change one thing.
 
This, coming from the guy who exactly one week ago denied that a piece of landing gear at a plane crash site even came from the plane.

Hilarious.


There is no evidence that it came from the plane. We are talking about looking for the truth here.
 
Except for the fact that no other plane crashed there.

Sorry but we are not talking about other planes, please stay on topic.

We are talking about evindece and reports that state the wheel at the Pentagon came from AA77, and there are none.
 
Do cruise missiles have landing gear?
Do pilots of some other plane notice if a wheel is missing at landing?
 
Why is it even remotely necessary to prove that a 757 nose wheel is from the airplane hundreds of people saw crash there?

Of course nobody with half a brain asks that question!

Might as well ask if the space shuttle that took off for Hubble the other day is the same one that will land in Florida day after tomorrow.

That is how stupid that question is, and the people who ask it are either even stupider, or they know they are full of it and are only trying to foement trouble.

Which is it?
 
Why is it even remotely necessary to prove that a 757 nose wheel is from the airplane hundreds of people saw crash there?

Because in truther-world a concept like convergence of evidence does not exist. So if someone should admit that you can't be 100% the wheel is from a 757, truthers will conclude that there never was a plane at Pentagon or in Shanksville. And of course, if you can't prove beyond any doubt the wheel is from AA77 that means WTC 1,2 and 7 were demolished.

It's quite simple really.
 
How many times must i repeat, that if i took you to court now and ask for evidence to support the official story you would lose the case.

Please take me roger.I am begging you.I cant wait for depo day!
You would not like the depo day!
 
Convergence of evidence

Because in truther-world a concept like convergence of evidence does not exist. So if someone should admit that you can't be 100% the wheel is from a 757, truthers will conclude that there never was a plane at Pentagon or in Shanksville. And of course, if you can't prove beyond any doubt the wheel is from AA77 that means WTC 1,2 and 7 were demolished.

It's quite simple really.

of that reminds me. Another photo the truthers hate. the one i call. "convergence of evidence". regarding CIT pentagon witness reports of pentagon impact specifically.

convergenceofevidence.jpg
 
Truthers don't want to see a picture of my balding great aunt Berta with the goiter, but probably for different reasons.
 
Why is it even remotely necessary to prove that a 757 nose wheel is from the airplane hundreds of people saw crash there?

Because its something called EVIDENCE in a criminal investigation and to identify the plane in a criminal investigation and thanks for showing you know nothing about aircraft parts.
 
Please take me roger.I am begging you.I cant wait for depo day!
You would not like the depo day!

Do you really want to be laughed out of court for not having any real evidence and almost no official reports that support the official story?
 
Why are we entertaining Ultima's fantasies here? He can go on and on about the wheel found in the Pentagon all he wants, but the fact remains that the FDR and ATC radar data places the jet there. Regardless of any identification that was or wasn't done to the wheel, other evidence clearly demonstrates that it was FL77 that hit.

There is no doubt about this. So why engage Ultima in his obsfucation? It doesn't matter what he says about the wheel because the wheel wasn't used to determine what hit the Pentagon. Rather, it's being used to drive the point home (i.e. 'We have the radar data, we have the FDR, we have witness statements, we have in flight calls... look, there's even a wheel there. Given all the other evidence, where would the wheel have come from?'...). The wheel is an "icing on the cake" photo, not a primary piece of evidence. It's part of the cumulation of evidence, it doesn't stand alone. And we've already tried to teach Ultima about the concept of convergence of evidence; he refuses to understand, and maintains that his single points of contention equals the refutation of our understanding of the events of that day. They don't.

Just put him on ignore. There's nothing to be gained by responding to his repetition of falsities and disproven points.
That was excellent! 100s of posts of stupid ideas gone.

RADAR, FDR, and DNA have never been refuted by 911TruthLies
 
We are talking about evindece and reports that state the wheel at the Pentagon came from AA77, and there are none.

Except for the fact that no plane besides AA77 crashed there.
 

Back
Top Bottom