no serial numbers were identified from flight 77

[Thunder]

Well first off i have plenty of evidence that shows reasonable doubt in the offical story.

such as?

 

[Gavron]

So you are saying flight 77 didnt hit the pentagon?

 

[ULTIMA1]

So you are saying flight 77 didnt hit the pentagon?

NO i did not say that, please read the post.

 

[Gavron]

I did read the post, and you are insinuating that flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon.

Perhaps you should research more before posting. It only shows how immature you are.

 

[Grizzly Bear]

So you are saying flight 77 didnt hit the pentagon?

He states that there's not sufficient evidence to determine that the plane hit the building yet wants to also state that he's not implying it didn't happen... Truly makes it confusing to dertimine what he wants to argue...

 

[beachnut]

Well first off i have plenty of evidence that shows reasonable doubt in the offical story.

There has not been enough hard evidence to show beyond a reasonable doubt that AA77 hit the Pentagon.

Hard evidence.

ULTIMA1 please show all the world the regulation that required the plane to be identified by serial numbers of parts? The world is waiting for you to tell us.

 

[ULTIMA1]

I did read the post, and you are insinuating that flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon.

Perhaps you should research more before posting. It only shows how immature you are.

You do know or i hope you are smart enough to knw that insinuating is not the same as stating.

 

[Gavron]

Grizzly,

He only wants to get his post count up, for some reason. Yesterdays posting frenzy proves that. 300+ posts yesterday, and nothing we havent seen in the past few years.

You would have thought with that many posts he discovered something new.

Not so...

 

[JoeyDonuts]

So, what did hit the Pentagon? Flight 77? An unknown airliner similar to Flight 77? Hidden explosives at ground level? A cruise missile? Dustifying space rays? Exploding first responders?

 

[ULTIMA1]

[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/77RadarTrack.jpg[/qimg]
Hard evidence.

Sorry but the FDR or track alone is not enough proof in a crime scene investigation.

Specailly if it can be questioned.

 

[Gavron]

You do know or i hope you are smart enough to knw that insinuating is not the same as stating.

You might want to look up the words you just used, and then you will see why that is so funny.

 

[ULTIMA1]

So, what did hit the Pentagon? Flight 77? An unknown airliner similar to Flight 77? Hidden explosives at ground level? A cruise missile? Dustifying space rays? Exploding first responders?

I have stated before we do not know for sure since we do not have all the evidence and reports.

 

[Gavron]

sounds like you are saying you believe fligh 77 didnt hit the Pentagon. Where is it then, Roger?

 

[ULTIMA1]

You might want to look up the words you just used, and then you will see why that is so funny.

What is funnier that you cannot quote a post where i stated it did not hit the Pentagon.

You are just trolling.

 

[Gavron]

Sounds like you dont have any opinions at all then. You cant decide if it hit or not, you cant decide if flight 93 was shot down or not.

Maybe you need to do more research, then get back to us, Roger.

 

[beachnut]

Sorry but the FDR or track alone is not enough proof in a crime scene investigation.

Specailly if it can be questioned.

For 911 the RADAR track was enough proof; you lack the knowledge and logical abilities to understand that and you can't tell us why serial numbers are needed.

It can't be questioned it is a fact. Go ahead question it with some evidence in hand. You have no evidence the RADAR proves it was 77 in the Pentagon.

But you can't even post the regulation that says serial numbers are required to identify planes and people can see you avoid this simple question and since lack knowledge you can't answer it?

Why are serial numbers needed?

 

[JoeyDonuts]

I have stated before we do not know for sure since we do not have all the evidence and reports.

So because YOU don't accept the evidence that has been put forth already, you can say that you aren't convinced flight 77 hit the Pentagon? There's got to be a reason other then the fact you can't get your hands on every piece of evidence you want. Is there something that suggests a likely other scenario enough to cast reasonable doubt on 77 impacting the Pentagon?

Because, honestly, what it looks like is that because you keep saying "we do not know for sure" because we "do not have all the evidence and reports" really just makes you appear daft. We have a significant amount of evidence and reports from the impact to say pretty conclusively that it's happened. The fact that minor technical data hasn't been released for one reason or another does not do anything to negate the hard work of the agencies that performed the investigation up to this point.

 

[ULTIMA1]

For 911 the RADAR track was enough proof; you lack the knowledge and logical abilities to understand that and you can't tell us why serial numbers are needed.

No its not enough proff or we would have had the criminal reports stating it was proof.

As stated serial numbers are needed to verify a planes ID.

It can't be questioned it is a fact.

Yes the FDR can be questioned if they do not find them or cannot match serial numbers.

But you can't even post the regulation that says serial numbers are required to identify planes and people can see you avoid this simple question and since lack knowledge you can't answer it?

I have posted the FAA statement that says they are required to verify the ID of a plane. Stop the lies.

 

[Gavron]

serial numbers, like those used in the Moussaoui trial?

 

[ULTIMA1]

So because YOU don't accept the evidence that has been put forth already, you can say that you aren't convinced flight 77 hit the Pentagon?

No there is no real evidence to accept. The majority of evidence posted by believers can be questioned and have no reports to support it..