Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I had to laugh once when the BBC conducted a search of it's entire computer system for references to 'bin Laden'. They were highly alarmed when quite a few references ppped up referring to 'bins laden' with this or 'bins laden' with that. lol
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
I had to laugh once when the BBC conducted a search of it's entire computer system for references to 'bin Laden'. They were highly alarmed whn quite a few references ppped up referring to 'bins laden' with this or 'bins laden' with that. lol
Click to expand...


Are you OK? You seem to be babbling now...
 
bill smith said:
I had to laugh once when the BBC conducted a search of it's entire computer system for references to 'bin Laden'. They were highly alarmed whn quite a few references ppped up referring to 'bins laden' with this or 'bins laden' with that. lol
Click to expand...

So what? It's good English.

Attempt at digression and distraction and denial noted.
 
BigAl said:
More that 1200 pages? Neither book has any pictures to speak of and neither is "large print".
Click to expand...

You make it sound iike the world was purged of all information about Al-Quada and it was all condensed into these few books you are talking about. Get real Al.
 
BigAl said:
Yup. 1200 pages of fine print.
Click to expand...
So we can assume that the world had mostly not read this book and that knowledge of Al-Quaeda was virtually non-existent ? Then you have to understand that the American Intelligence agencies had little or no idea about them either. You remember yourself that the attacks were a complete surprise ?

So even after so many years we can say that the US intellience agencies cannot have infiltrated the organisation at all....otherwise hey wold have had advance kowledge, right ?

How did they have the names of all 19 hijackers within 24 hours and all their pictures within 48 hours ? I mean working from a standing start like that ?
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
So we can assume
Click to expand...

Your batting average for assumptions for as long as I've been aware of you has been zero.

So we can assume that the world had mostly not read this book
and that knowledge of Al-Quaeda was virtually non-existent ?
Click to expand...

We've established that the NYT wrote its first article about bin Laden and AQ in 1998.

Yuu seem to have a very short memory.

Then you have to understand that the American Intelligence agencies had little or no idea about them either. You remember yourself that the attacks were a complete surprise ?[/QUOTE]

No. It wasn't a complete surprise. We had 50 or so warnings that the Bush administration fumbled.

Read Spying Blind by Amy Zegart.

You are rather good at dodge ball.
 
Last edited:
BigAl said:
Your batting average for assumptions for as long as I've been aware of you has been zero.



We've established that the NYT wrote its first article about bin Laden and AQ in 1998.

Yuu seem to have a very short memory.

Then you have to understand that the American Intelligence agencies had little or no idea about them either. You remember yourself that the attacks were a complete surprise ?
Click to expand...

No. It wasn't a complete surprise. We had 50 or so warnings that the Bush administration fumbled.

Read Spying Blind by Amy Zegart.

You are rather good at dodge ball.[/QUOTE]

lol
 
Pardalis said:
What's a super-cave?
Click to expand...


Weak memory, eh?

990749fca998abbd4.gif
 
...
How did they have the names of all 19 hijackers within 24 hours and all their pictures within 48 hours ? I mean working from a standing start like that ?
Click to expand...
911Truth can't figure out the easy stuff; the idiot terrorists flew on the jets, they used their IDs to board aircraft; the crew told on them by seat positions and names on 911. Gee we cheated and paid attention instead of acting like dolts and ignoring the evidence.

The terrorists were caught and killed on 911! The passengers on Flight 93 figured out 911 in minutes, the anti-intellectual 911Truth can't do it with 7 years, 7 months, and 22 days; pure stupid statement like this are the only product of 911Truth.

911Truth - the dumb question stupid statement factory using lies, hearsay and fantasy to mislead the gullible.
 
On a different note, and since I couldn't be bothered to start a thread on it given his miniscule relevance in the twoof movement, it looks like Ace Baker is going for broke:
http://acebaker.blogspot.com/2009/04/100000-amateur-video-challenge.html

$100k for providing him with an original video of the 2nd impact. Though I wouldn't be surprised if he has some legalese loophole, that would let him escape without having to part with a dime.
 
Last edited:
Richard Gage

Richard Gage Interviews Architects at AIA Convention, April 30, 2009

This is from last night. On May 1, we will stream both the AIA Convention and Steven Jones at UC Davis at 7PM Pacific at http://www.justin.tv/ae911truth
On May 2 we will stream the convention from 10AM to about 1:30PM Pacific, then at 4PM we will live stream Richard's talk at the Westin Hotel, before a large group of convention architects.

Thanks again to all our supporters and this great blog!

http://youtube-featured.blogspot.com/2009/05/richard-gage-interviews-architects-at.html
 
Alex Jones, super nut case expert on nothing, talks to Professor Neils Harrit of the University of Copenhagen about the nano-thermitic compounds he made up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x73G2eMkBpw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2E911blogger%2Ecom%2F&feature=player_embedded
Click to expand...
One idiot with a megaphone and the anti-intellectual expert on super-thermite. This is a big giant super-thermite step to the Pulitzer Prize for delusions and junk science. Wait, there is no Pulitzer for being stupid. Where will Jones stick his super-thermite now?

Sorry for posting Alex Jones junk; prefect fit with 911Truth?
 
Last edited:
And you have Gage regurgitating Jones old failed ideas, lies, delusions, and the new made up super-thermite found in dust.

911Truth is still in the zombie mode wanting to chant "inside job"; the guy in the video wanted so bad to say "inside job".

Richard Gage peddles woo at AIA Convention, April 30, 2009

http://www.justin.tv/ae911truth

No ideas are too anti-intellectual for Gage to repeat.

http://youtube-featured.blogspot.com/2009/05/richard-gage-interviews-architects-at.html
Click to expand...

How can someone be spewing so much stupid?
Who is dumb enough to fall for this fraud?
people were aghast! (at his stupidity)

They were bragging about their evidence? (they have zero evidence! )

some people are completely blocked as Gage presents the evidence!

They have 80 percent support! (you are delusional)

When people wave us off! lol - these guys are cult members and pure nuts!
Click to expand...

Gages cult members say, "some people don't want to hear the truth" = most people know you are nuts!

Gage ideas and delusions find root in doltish minds too gullible to engage their brains before signing the petitions of claptrap.

Gage cult idiots put up the money! Gage has a paid vacations in the city in the best hotel on the money from his delusional cult members. Gage has no scruples, or he is dirt dumb stupid (sorry dirt, you are smarter).

It looks slick until you read the tripe. So far only 0.00087 percent of all engineers have failed to live up to their education.

Poor idiots who signed up and will be posted by name exposing their 911 stupidity on the Internet. The stupid hurts watching Gage talk about 911.

How dumb do people have to be to fall for Gages delusions? The are so shallow to sign up for stupid.

How gullible do people have to be to believe Gage? (see below)
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
And you have Gage regurgitating Jones old failed ideas and lies.



How can someone be spewing so much stupid? Who is dumb enough to fall for this fraud?



some people don't want to hear the truth = most people know you are nuts!

Gage is a such a dolt.
Click to expand...

No need to panic yet Beachnut. It looks very impressive but it may mean nothing. 9/11 Truth is probably not making inroads as heavily as it looks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom