gumboot
lorcutus.tolere
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2006
- Messages
- 25,327
Gummy my friend, let's try another approach, because if you can discuss the finer nuances of the characters in Les Miserables, I know you must be a relatively intelligent person.
Why do you think the WHO would have raised the pandemic flu alert level to 5 based on only 7 confirmed fatalities?
None of the WHO pandemic phases make any mention of the severity of the infection, nor its fatality level. This is something others have tried to get across to those complaining that "pandemic" is a scare tactic. Epidemics and pandemics are references to how widespread the infection is, and how easily it is being transmitted, not how severe the individual infections are.
You could have a common cold pandemic reaching phase 6 and never killing a single person.
Phase 5 is characterized by human-to-human spread of the virus into at least two countries in one WHO region. While most countries will not be affected at this stage, the declaration of Phase 5 is a strong signal that a pandemic is imminent and that the time to finalize the organization, communication, and implementation of the planned mitigation measures is short.
That's the WHO definition. No mention of severity.
I think perhaps we're talking at cross-purposes here. I'm not talking about the severity of the pandemic, but the severity of the actual infections themselves.
I fully agree that we can expect the pandemic to be much more widespread than currently confirmed cases.
What I don't agree on is that we can expect the severity of actual infections to be, on average, more severe than the average for the currently confirmed cases.
In other words I'm not saying:
"I'm not worried because hardly anyone has it so I won't catch it"
I'm saying:
"I'm not worried because if I catch it I'm not going to get too sick"