NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
ULTIMA1 said:
Please read carefully and as many times as it takes to understand.

I ASKED FOR A VERY SPECIFIC DOCUMENT, THE FOIA OFFICE STATED IN THE LETTER THAT THEY FOUND THE DOCUMENTS I WAS LOOKING FOR. THEY ALSO STATED SO IN A PHONE CONVERSATION.
Click to expand...

you read this very carefully...

In the ONE AND ONLY FOIA you have shown us, you asked for MULTIPLE DOCUMENTS, which included the CRITICS, and...AND...AND...the UA 93 reports.

The response for the FOIA was that they had found DOCUMENTS (not THE documents, not THE CRITICS) in RESPONSE to your request.

That COULD include the CRITIC, but might only contain the UA93 reports you ALSO requested, or it may just contain information related to those forms (that is what RESPONSIVE means).

I have to come to the conclusion that you are not who you say you are, or you have had a stroke and lost brain function. I say this in all seriousness, because after myself and others have CLEARLY shown you where you are mistaken, you either (A) Do not understand, or (B) refuse to listen.

Either way, YOU ARE NOT AN NSA ANALYST of any kind.

TAM:)
 
ULTIMA1 said:
YES.


YES, as taken from and shown the public intenet states the critic says Flight 93 was shot down. But as also stated the actaul critic is not word for word as stated on the internet.
Click to expand...

I am not talking about the internet. I am talking about YOUR claims that YOU read the classified version of the critic due to your security clearance at the NSA.

So you read the classified version of the critic.

Did the classified version of the critic stated that flight 93 was shot down?
 
Let me just address one thing there.

I do not have a TS/SI clearance. Therefore, U1 is wrong, AGAIN, about the clearance he mentioned.

Just thought I'd point that out.
 
Sabrina said:
I do not have a TS/SI clearance. Therefore, U1 is wrong, AGAIN, about the clearance he mentioned.
Click to expand...

Neither do I or anyone else. The more he posts the more he keeps stepping in it with gaffe's like these. The idiot knows absolutely NOTHING accurate about Security Clearances or related issues.
 
Cue U1 accusing me of lying about having a security clearance in 3...2...1....

*chuckles*
 
Aidoneus said:
So do we have the document yet? No? Thought not.
Click to expand...

I just waded through this entire thread for the first time, and I'm kinda disappointed-I thought, for sure, after 47 pages, I'd get to see the notorious document(s). :mad:

Enjoyed the thread, though-especially the part about the submarine base in Nevada. Being a Nevada native, and intimately familiar with the geography of that state, a sub training base is a fairly laughable idea. Perhaps Ultima will suggest the submarine base is out at Groom Lake next? :D
 
This thread has been going on since October. The person who pretends to have a blockbuster document doesn't have it. 'Nuff said.
 
Sabrina said:
Let me just address one thing there.

I do not have a TS/SI clearance. Therefore, U1 is wrong, AGAIN, about the clearance he mentioned.

Just thought I'd point that out.
Click to expand...

While I do believe that Ultima1 is Roger Misner, and I believe he is a grown adult, that is all I believe wrt to him. I do not believe he is an NSA analyst of any kind. His demeanor on this forum, his grammer as well as his overall presentation are in NO WAY like that of analyst or professional of any kind.

TAM:)
 
Just checking in to see if we have a document yet. Did I miss the link for it somewhere?
 
Hey Ultima, I know wherever you're incarcerated or institutionalized your handlers are only giving one hour of computer time. As I won't be available to catch your morning troll, I'll just put this out there:

Recap:

1. You've been parroting the Wayne Madsen Report all this time.

2. You have nothing else.

Are you ever going to address Mr. Herbert, who has caught you in a lie?

Will you now ignore Sabrina, Reheat and JoeyDonuts, who have also caught you lying?

Allow me to refresh your memory. Care to explain this exchange with JoeyDonuts?:

ULTIMA1 said:
I have an NSA TS/SI clearence with 6 compartments and know what i am talking about.
Click to expand...

JoeyDonuts said:
There is no such thing as a TS/SI clearance.
Click to expand...

ULTIMA1 said:
What a bold face lie. Becasue if the isn't then Sabrina is also lieing about her clearence.
Click to expand...

You might want to explain your TS/SI clearance to Sabrina and Reheat as well. I'm sure your answer will fascinate them to no end.

Time to tell the truth Ultima1, The lies are getting easier and easier to spot. And you should also know that if I don't read anything but the truth from you, then on ignore you go. You've been proven time and again a liar and I can waste no more time on you. Sure, you're losing your special playtime buddy, but don't worry, there will be others.

And if you do go on ignore then let these be the last words you hear for me:

In the entire history of this thread, did you ever notice that the only one who believes a word you say is you? Wonder why that is.;)
 
Gavron said:
When 16.5 posts his information when he gets it, it will hopefully put the nail in the coffin on this waste of bandwidth.
Click to expand...

The only thing the document is going to put another nail in is the official story.


I mean the document has been shown to exist on the internet, by letter from the FOIA office and by phone call to the FOIA office.
 
funk de fino said:
You lied, the Flight 800 crash is not considered a crime. It is an accident and that is why an accident report was done by the NTSB.
Click to expand...

Please stop the lies. Flight 800 was originally considered a crime, thats why the FBI and NTSB spent time doing criminal investigations.

The reason they were not done for 911, was that the crashes were not accidents of an unknown nature.
Click to expand...

It does not matter what 9/11 was considered, by law the FBI and NTSB need to investiagte and report on the crashes. PLEASE STOP THE LIES.


Then again someone who was a crewchief on F4 would not claim they were mostly made of steel.
Click to expand...

Please be mature enough to admit as shown through facts the F-4 is more then 50% steel. STOP THE LIES.
 
beachnut said:
You can't find the reports?[/quoute]

I guess you cannot either since i have been asking for the official FBI and NTSb reports for years.

Funny how all you armchair patriots are supermen and can't have your throats cut when you don't know there is a fight coming.
Click to expand...

Funny how even a Viet Nam Vet could not even get a call or signal out, unless you want to suggest he was afriad of a man with a box cutter.

We do that at least 1 plane was warned about the hijackings.

Sorry, only the pilots have radios to talk to ATC; the Pilots were on ATC frequency being killed.[/quot]

If the pilots were on the radios why didn't they call for help when the hijackers were breaking in to the cockpit?

Very starange that out of 4 planes not one could get off a call or signal.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
sabrina said:
let me just address one thing there.

I do not have a ts/si clearance. Therefore, u1 is wrong, again, about the clearance he mentioned.

Just thought i'd point that out.
Click to expand...

so you were lying when you stated the following?

22nd april 2009, 01:28 pm #1682
sabrina
wicked lovely


several members of my unit have secret, top secret, and ts/sci clearances, some with polygraphs.
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom