NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
T.A.M. said:
oh come on...Daeewo....a classic.

TAM:D
Click to expand...

The JREF Pithing team salutes you!

picture.php
picture.php
picture.php
picture.php
picture.php
 
DGM said:
Actually, No it doesn't. The "official story" only deals with the high-jacked planes..
Click to expand...


I suggest you read the 9/11 commission report(official story). It states that no fighters were near any of the planes on 9/11.

The NSA document contridicts this statment.
 
nicepants said:
What's fishy is not what other internet sites say, but that you are posting information which you claim is classified.
Click to expand...


I never claimed anything i posted was classified.

the NSa Critic is classified thats why i asked for a declassified copy in the FOIA request.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Will you show me the research you have done?

I have shown the FOIA requests sent to the NTSB and to NSA to find the truth.
Click to expand...

but if you have already seen and read the classified version of the document, then why bother? You think they are suddenly going to declassify such damning evidence just for you?

TAM:)
 
ElMondoHummus said:
It would not - and indeed, could not - contradict the whole of the "official story". It would contradicts one single, isolated point about one single isolated detail, and that's it.
Click to expand...

As far as government reports go (9/11 commission report) if 1 part is proven wrong then the whole report is suspect and needs to be investigated.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
As far as government reports go (9/11 commission report) if 1 part is proven wrong then the whole report is suspect and needs to be investigated.
Click to expand...

ah yes the good old truther stand by, "one rotten apple" clause.

Priceless.

TAM:)
 
Sabrina said:
*arches a brow* Sparky, I've explained and explained why you have committed a security violation and have gotten agreement on my assessment from several posters here, my entire reserve unit, and the security folks I reported you to.
Click to expand...

Well the reserve unit does not know much about security. What clearence do you all have?

I still have not posted anything that would be considered a security breach.

As for where you work, you have yet to prove definitively that you work where you say you work.
Click to expand...

I have posted plenty of documents that others have figured out where i work. Why is it so difficult for you and other believers to figure it out?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
As far as government reports go (9/11 commission report) if 1 part is proven wrong then the whole report is suspect and needs to be investigated.
Click to expand...
That's false. Only twoofers require that the report has to be 100% dead on accurate. Rational people know that things can be misreported or even left out. This so-called intercept is really not all that important except that the pilot of the aircraft can give an accurate account of what the final moments of flight 93 was. Other than that, it's really immaterial.
 
fezzic said:
Perhaps I might ask Ultima1 which of the following best describes the contents of the CRITIC which he claim exists and to have actually read:

1. CRITIC describes an interception and shootdown of flight 93.

2. CRITIC describes an interception of an airliner (presumably hijacked or suspected hijacked).
Click to expand...


Actually it is a combination of both.
 
T.A.M. said:
the link at the top of the article does go to Madsen's website, but you cannot access the article from that site unless you join.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Here is the Madsen article, again, for the third time, in this thread. Things get buried fast.
Posted each time by me, oddly enough. I hope this is the one you want.
The NSA CRITIC, according to sources who have seen it, is about five or six sentences, and paraphrasically states:

“Two F-16s scrambled from Andrews Air Force Base at [likely 1336 Zulu]. Civilian airline hijacked. Over state of Pennsylvania civilian airliner was ‘intercepted’ at (Latitude and Longitude of intercept].”

Several follow-up CRITICs are appended to the first United 93-related CRITIC. One follow-up CRITIC mentioned a possible fifth hijacked plane flying south from Canada that was near the Canadian-U.S. border. Another CRITIC states the plane ‘intercepted’ over Pennsylvania was ‘confirmed civilian.’
Click to expand...

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_3568.shtml

--Makes you wonder if Ultima is the source,in bold?
 
Last edited:
Mr.Herbert said:
It's funny how Roger used a hotmail account and signed his name ... Department of Defense.
Click to expand...

So i could show all you immature, closed minded types that i had sent the FOIA request. Since you will not accept anything unless it is shown to you several times in several ways.
 
apathoid said:
Cognitive Dissonance? You've been droning on for months about how you have this insider knowledge that UA93 was shot down, now you apparently don't even believe it crashed(or existed)? Mind clarifying ULTIMA?
Click to expand...

Even if it was shoot down there would still be parts that would have numbers on them.

I don't want to get into a debate about it, but have you considered that a shootdown of UA93 does absolutely nothing to prove an Inside Job?
Click to expand...

I never stated that it was an inside job, what fantasy world are you living in?

Makes less sense than your NSA fantasy.
Click to expand...

Too bad its not a fantasy since the document does exist.
 
As stated on the NTSB site, the final report is property of the FBI. They've released all the info that they can. Anything else has to come from the FBI. IIRC, you haven't shown your FOIA request to the FBI.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom