Mr.Herbert
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2007
- Messages
- 1,449
Can you read liar?
do you remember posting this in August?
Sorry but i have posted facts and evidence, it just most people do not want to accept those facts and evidence if it goes against what they believe in thier safe little fantasy world.
Only if the believers can restrain from spreading the lies that they know what happened that day without any fact, evidence, or official reports.
[qimg]
do you remember posting this in August?
I do have the acces but as stated again and again i am waiting for the actual documents.
I have only read the main document, i have not read the follow up reports that are talked about on the internet.
Does the internet state that the Critic states that flight 93 was intercepted and shot down, YES or NO?
Just because you say "facts and evidence" over and over again does not make you right. It makes you a pathological liar.
You've posted no facts. No evidence.
The "internet" doesnt state anything.
We are talking about you lying about the alleged CRITIC you allegedly read, and it stated that flight 93 was shot down.
You were caught lying and you wont admit it.
Which of course have nothing to do with this thread, correct? Unless flight 93 flew into skyscrapers that were collapsing at the Pentagon.
So fun and easy to post facts, you should try it sometime.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/message/42103?l=1
October 29, 2007 -- SPECIAL REPORT -- United Flight 93 shot down by Air Force jets scrambled from Andrews
Did they say which 3?
Because the document itself does not contain much to be classified. It must be the platforms that were used.
16.5, since the Liar said it was a NSA Critic and it was referred to ANOTHER agency, doesn't that prove that Roger is a liar .... yet again and that there is no such critic?