NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Roger in September, at Above Top Secret, you are quoted as saying that you read the classified version of a Critic. You confirmed it about 5 minutes ago.

Back in September you stated that the critic states that it was flight 93.

Ultima1 said:
Do you know what a CRITIC is?

The NSA has one in thier archives that states Flight 93 was shot down.
Click to expand...

Now you are stating that the critic does not give the specific flight number.

You HAVE been caught lying. If you fail to acknowledge this, you are a lot worse off than I suspected.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Will will have to wait for the document to come out to see if it was Flight 93 or Flight 1989 that was confused for Flight 93.
Click to expand...

But you said you already READ the document....you should know this.

Why are you lying now?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I have stated about some reports and evidence that suggest a shoot down but have never stated it was shot down.
Click to expand...

How do you know it's "evidence" if you've never seen it. Why are you calling it "evidence"?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Yes thats right, i have stated that and stand by it.

Will will have to wait for the document to come out to see if it was Flight 93 or Flight 1989 that was confused for Flight 93.

Either way the document still contridicts the official story. Just 1 more peice of evidnece that shows reasonable doubt in the official story
Click to expand...

yah that is a big step down from your original claims when you first came here. Too bad you are not man enough to simply say,

"When I first came here I overstated my case." and then restate your current case...but I am not surprised.

TAM:)
 
ULTIMA1 said:
yes i have read the document



I never stated the plane was shot down, i stated it may have been shot down. The document clearly shows a plane was intercepted.




No i did no get caught with my pants down it just takes basic common sense and basic intelligence to know whats going on, clearly you lack both
Click to expand...

ULTIMA1 said:
First off the document states that Flight 93 was intercepted (which contridicts the official story that no planes were near Flight 93).
Click to expand...
No, you said Flight 93, not a plane, but Flight 93, and you have said you READ the document. So you are a liar or you have to say you said Flight 93 NOW.

You tried to imply Flight 93 was shot down; but failed? 19 terrorists did it all. Good for you. And you paper is wrong? NO cell phones?
 
T.A.M. said:
Exactly. Snowball is catching up with him.

TAM:)
Click to expand...
The big problem with lying is remembering what lie you told when.
When you can't even remember, with it all laid-out, in writing, and visible to everyone, well...
Where can you go from here? Even Southwest doesn't fly there...:D
 
ULTIMA1 said:
The critic states that a plane was intercepted (as i have stated all along) As far as which plane we will not know untill the document has been declassified to see what information has not been taken out of the document.

The Critic does not give a specifc flight number(which is why i asked for follow up reports), but we know that it could have only been 1 of 2 planes. Either flight 93 or flight 1989 (which was confused for flight 93 for a while.
Click to expand...

ULTIMA1 said:
Yes thats right, i have stated that and stand by it.

Will will have to wait for the document to come out to see if it was Flight 93 or Flight 1989 that was confused for Flight 93.

Either way the document still contridicts the official story. Just 1 more peice of evidnece that shows reasonable doubt in the official story
Click to expand...

rwguinn said:
The big problem with lying is remembering what lie you told when.
When you can't even remember, with it all laid-out, in writing, and visible to everyone, well...
Where can you go from here? Even Southwest doesn't fly there...:D
Click to expand...



Heck, he couldn't even remember what lie he was telling for more than 14 minutes!

At this point U1, nothing you say can be trusted. Until you post the actual documents you receive, nothing you say is worth a damn thing. So just stop wasting our time, and wait until you have something to post that is more than just your oft-repeated (and confused) lies.
 
This is curious, since "Rogers" return, his internet access seems limited to about 1 hour a day, and usually around lunchtime. Possibly using an internet cafe, or the school librarys access now?:confused:
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Will will have to wait for the document to come out to see if it was Flight 93 or Flight 1989 that was confused for Flight 93.
Click to expand...
If you work at the NSA (we have established that you do not, because you refuse to answer my questions), then why don't you go and read the document and the follow up reports again and then tell us which flight it was. Certainly if everything you've said so far is okay to post on the internet then that little tibit of information will be as well.

Go on, I'll be here waiting for the answer.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I have stated about some reports and evidence that suggest a shoot down but have never stated it was shot down.
Click to expand...

For Christ's sake!! Now you have nothing from the NSA saying 93 was shot down???


what a @#$%&$% waste of time.
 
Haha, serves you right! I put the thing on ignore months ago, and only check in here occasionally to see if the punch line has been delivered yet. Not holding my breath tho... Good effort, 16.5.
 
My best friend works at the State Dept. He is also former CIA and DOD. If he knew something..he would tell me something.

He has told me squat.
 
parky76 said:
For Christ's sake!! Now you have nothing from the NSA saying 93 was shot down???


what a @#$%&$% waste of time.
Click to expand...

Honestly Parky, did you really think this guy's "earth Shattering" document was going to be anything even close?

It has been fun playing, but it is time for him to put his toys away...

TAM:)
 
Come on Ulitma, if you are going to be an Internet liar, at least be smart enough to keep all of your lies straight.
 
will someone please ban this guy already. He is a joke. Hell, he even got banned from ATS. Which is nearly impossible if you believe or support any of those crazy theories over there. All he does is go on every forum on the internet to try to get a response from people by telling the to be an adult and grow up. I challenged him to an iq test when he was posting his retarded theories on ATS. He told me to post my score and then he would take the test and post his. After I did post it and sent a link to my score, twenty minutes later he came back and said "What does IQ have to do with anything?" He obviously scored under 90, which means he is a slow adult. Of course all you have to do is read his post to know that. Actually, dont ban him. His posts are quite entertaining. Especially now that he has been caught in a lie. "I never said the critic message said flight 93 was shot down.":jaw-dropp Really? This idiot never ceases to amaze me.
 
As much as he is a nuisance, and adds little to any conversation, so long as he does not break any rules, they will not, and should not ban him.

I actually despise other forums, where if they don't like the content, or even the tone, in what you say, they ban you outright.

TAM:)
 
parky76 said:
My best friend works at the State Dept. He is also former CIA and DOD. If he knew something..he would tell me something.

He has told me squat.
Click to expand...

Not if he wants to keep his clearance, parky. No offense or anything, but if the information is classified, he can't say a thing, whether you're a friend of his or not, UNLESS you met some very specific criteria, and from what I've seen on here (please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong however) you don't meet the criteria. That's how a security clearance and classified information is SUPPOSED to work, a fact that Ultima doesn't seem to get no matter how it's explained to him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom