J. Wellington Wimpy
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2009
- Messages
- 354
In other words, if Jones hadn't been looking for thermite, the results wouldn't be convincing, but because he was looking for thermite, they are.
Dave
Moved and seconded.
In other words, if Jones hadn't been looking for thermite, the results wouldn't be convincing, but because he was looking for thermite, they are.
Dave
Howdy folks, I haven't been following this stuff for a while, so I popped over to LCF to see how many threads a guy needs to read before finding a potential nomination. Turns out the answer was two.
From a thread unsettlingly titled researching backgrounds of alleged passengers poster JawsInc shows us the era of the investigoogler is finally drawing to a close. But not in the way we hoped...
JawsInc@LCF said:Has anyone investigated the alleged passengers and their occupations, etc ... I was trying to cross reference the names in the Mousawi trial flash presentation and google'ing their names and Im not getting much, some but not much. There must be an easier way than this...

Okay, here it is.
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/1212539/6/
and to refresh everyone's memory about what Aldo said:
is his theory? That they took the individuals, burned them to death, then deposited them at the Pentagon for DNA harvesting??General Erich Von Manstein said:“I divide my officers into four classes; the clever, the lazy, the industrious, and the stupid. Most often two of these qualities come together. The officers who are clever and industrious are fitted for the highest staff appointments. Those who are stupid and lazy make up around 90% of every army in the world, and they can be used for routine work. The man who is clever and lazy however is for the very highest command; he has the temperament and nerves to deal with all situations. But whoever is stupid and industrious is a menace and must be removed immediately!”
Ben, it's not very hard to understand. I agree with their results, just not the conclusions they came up with based on those "facts".
Spelling the names right might be an easier way.
No, even if it was cord, and not his frail hands, there's no way a shriveled little 98 year old dude has enough body weight to do the job.
I'm not sure if this meets all of the qualifications, but I'm nominating this post by Caustic Logic from the Rudolf Hess thread because of the implication that old people are lighter than air and thus cannot strangle themselves by hanging:
That one doesn't count, as he intended it as a joke.
it was a crime committed by foreign nationals (supposedly), holding mostly saudi passports. that makes it an international law enforcement issue, unless of course someone decides that's too messy and might reflect badly on the parties who were asleep at the wheel, and it's easier to just launch a couple of wars in the middle of the night.
March is off to a good start.
What else is new? 'Anti-semite' as in: 'seeing through the jews'?
The Dutch Staten Generaal (as in: Staten Island) wanted to send a contingent of jews to New Amsterdam (giving in to pressure from the Amsterdam Jews). Peter Stuyvesant resisted that idea. He wrote to the Staten: "they are a treacherous people, I don't want them!". Read about that story in the book 'The Island at the Center of the World: The Epic Story of Dutch Manhattan and the Forgotten Colony That Shaped America' by the jewish author Russell Shorto.
Peter Stuyvesant lost, they came. It took them until 1912 to completely take over the US-joint when they captured the FED and thus American politics until this day. And now they are using America as a vehicle to try to conquer the rest of the world. That's where this 9/11 deception fitted in.
Yes, material of dropped part C and hit part A doesn't matter! It can be composite steel structures, pizza paper boxes, sponges of syntethic or natural fibres, lemons, etc. as described before. Part C can never crush down part A! There are two basic cases!
1. The energy applied is only sufficient to elastically deform parts A and C. Result - part C bounces on part A.
2. The energy applied is sufficient to cause failures of parts A and C. Then parts A and C are damaged at the contact area, the interface changes and the energy is consumed by local faulures of both parts A and C.
Quite basic actually. Part C can never destroy part A.
You don't know the half of it, big guy. Take a long, disbelieving gander at this.![]()
9/11 Investigator in the JREF 9/11 section http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136537&page=3 tells us who is REALLY Behind Everything Bad In The US:
Wow....just wow.
THe guy is making no effort to hide it, is he?
Deserves a stundie just for the sheer Chutzpah involved.
I can't believe those dopes are still at it.
Don't they have new CTs to worry about ?
Things quieted down for awhile but this new crop of Truthers we have are really providing the hilarious goods.
You don't know the half of it, big guy. Take a long, disbelieving gander at this.![]()
whatever. i don't care cause you'll die in a few years anyway. I know i'm right so i could give two OMGRULE10 if you believe me