Hugo Chavez Loves Free Speech...

instead of thinking about a coup, the venezuelan opposition should finaly realise what is going on, and try to creat or be an alternative to bolivarianism.

But so far it looks like they just want back to the pre chavez time. but the poor majority of Venezuelans dont want that.

The time is over when a small minority of Venezuelans profited from all the Oil money. now those in need profit from it.
 
There isn't too much oil money to be had these days (relatively anyway). Prices are pretty cheap.

yes thats true, lets hope it is still enough to keep up the Missions. Healthcare and Education etc. And that they keep making the effort for geting away from the Oil dependency.
 
Alex Libman,

All governments are in bed together...

Would you care to elaborate on that?


corplinx,

Dangerous to who? I used to create the most chavez criticism threads here. I never thought he was a danger to anyone except himself and his people.

Isn't a leader that's dangerous to his own people a cause for opposition, dislike, and criticism in itself?


INRM
 
Would you care to elaborate on that?

I've seen both sides of the so-called "iron curtain" (my father worked for the Soviet version of the military-industrial complex), and I understand very well how the war between the two was never a possibility, but both sides wanted to pretend that there was. The reality is that the United States, which in effect created the USSR as the result of its interventionism (WW1 and WW2), is also what kept it from collapsing even earlier than it did by giving its hardliners an excuse to quell dissent due to the "Cold War". Everyone in Washington loved it, including the welfare mongers trying to shame people into believing communist propaganda and trying to one-up it here.

Even with a small nut like Chavez or Kim Jong-il, the other governments play by the rules that keep them in power, the United Nations and all that, while monopolizing the defense market. Heck, even in the case of Bin Laden, the government monopoly pulled a "whoopsie daisy" that is pretty difficult for a person who exists outside the nationalistic brainwashing bubble to believe. A free market defense sector, consisting of many competing agencies, would have done much better.

All kings are foes of all the men they rule!
 
Last edited:
I've seen both sides of the so-called "iron curtain" (my father worked for the Soviet version of the military-industrial complex), and I understand very well how the war between the two was never a possibility, but both sides wanted to pretend that there was. The reality is that the United States, which in effect created the USSR as the result of its interventionism (WW1 and WW2), is also what kept it from collapsing even earlier than it did by giving its hardliners an excuse to quell dissent due to the "Cold War". Everyone in Washington loved it, including the welfare mongers trying to shame people into believing communist propaganda and trying to one-up it here.

!
The United States created the USSR? That is a new one to me? Which Soviet history book did you get that from?
 
The United States created the USSR? That is a new one to me? Which Soviet history book did you get that from?

What do you think would have happened if USA had decided to sit out World War I all the way through (as it was constitutionally bound to do)?


So nations never go to war with each other?

Nationalist concept of war: bad.

Free people cutting the throat of a tinpot dictator: good.
 
What do you think would have happened if USA had decided to sit out World War I all the way through (as it was constitutionally bound to do)?

Pardon?

Care to explain what part of the Constitution bound us from keeping out of WWI?
 
What do you think would have happened if USA had decided to sit out World War I all the way through ?[/qupte]

The british blockade would have held and germany would have been stalved into submission. It would likely have ceased to existed shortly thereafter.
 
What do you think would have happened if USA had decided to sit out World War I all the way through (as it was constitutionally bound to do)?




Nationalist concept of war: bad.

Free people cutting the throat of a tinpot dictator: good.
I still don't get your assertion that the United States created the USSR. Please explain that to me?
 
Don't you guys get it? The only reason the vast majority of history contradicts what he says is because "they" make it seem that way. The total lack of evidence of what he is saying is the evidence.

Wake up, sheeple.
 
Coup shmoop. Us capitalists would have assassinated Hugo Chavez by now if the U.S. government wasn't standing in our way, and the same applies to every other third world dictator out there disrespecting our property rights. All governments are in bed together...


Wow, just wow.
You know, I have finally figured out why we get so much total craziness from Anarchists. If they were not at least a little crazy, they would not be Anarchists to begin with.
 
All the good things in the world. Remember we only do the bad things. Not only that, but we kick puppies while we do them too.
 
Wow, just wow.
You know, I have finally figured out why we get so much total craziness from Anarchists. If they were not at least a little crazy, they would not be Anarchists to begin with.

He's not an Anarchist. Anarchists belive in freedom.
 
Are you from Venezuela? I spent a lot of time in Caracas in the early nineties and loved it there. I have never seen more beautiful women in my life and that constant 72 degree weather was heaven since I am from Houston.

Yes, sir. I am from Venezuela and despite this current social hell, I'm proud of being a Venezuelan.

I mean, this speaks for itself:



But it saddens me that we have to go through this

I just hung out with a friend of mine from Venezuela and she was telling me that in the last year she has been robbed thrice and kidnapped twice. On one of the occasions they beat her up.

And she's such a humble, beautiful, hard working human being.

I mean, WHY??
 

Back
Top Bottom