• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

9/11 Conspiracy Theorists: What are you doing to set KSM free?

I like that idea, saves a lot of work for me and it does a better job of shutting up twoofers than throwing a textbook at them and saying, "Here, learn ya something."
 
I think that would be excellent. A month of co-ordinated responses should get a reply. I have to say I've never met such a bunch stupid when reading truthers JREF posts. None of them have any integrity.
 
In MDC section debunkers use "Think of the orphans" moral, emotional blackmail in attempts to attract their food source (believers in the paranormal). In the CT section twoofer lovers use the death of three thousand people in New York to feed their addiction. It's strange to see desperate, hungry "critical thinkers" behaving Jehovah's Witnesses.
 
JihadJane said:
In MDC section debunkers use "Think of the orphans" moral, emotional blackmail in attempts to attract their food source (believers in the paranormal). In the CT section twoofer lovers use the death of three thousand people in New York to feed their addiction. It's strange to see desperate, hungry "critical thinkers" behaving Jehovah's Witnesses.
Click to expand...

Only somebody so far entrenched in his own irrational world view as to be unreachable could read this forum, and the posts of the "truthers", and come to the conclusion that the "debunkers" are the ones behaving like Jehovah's Witnesses.

Very odd.
 
JihadJane said:
In MDC section debunkers use "Think of the orphans" moral, emotional blackmail in attempts to attract their food source (believers in the paranormal). In the CT section twoofer lovers use the death of three thousand people in New York to feed their addiction. It's strange to see desperate, hungry "critical thinkers" behaving Jehovah's Witnesses.
Click to expand...

It's not our fault that twoofers are intellectually dishonest cowards with zero integrity.
 
Last edited:
JihadJane said:
In MDC section debunkers use "Think of the orphans" moral, emotional blackmail in attempts to attract their food source (believers in the paranormal). In the CT section twoofer lovers use the death of three thousand people in New York to feed their addiction. It's strange to see desperate, hungry "critical thinkers" behaving Jehovah's Witnesses.
Click to expand...

You're still doing nothing I see, aren't you interested in justice being served instead of wasting your time with "twoofer addicts"?
 
TexasJack said:
You're still doing nothing I see, aren't you interested in justice being served instead of wasting your time with "twoofer addicts"?
Click to expand...



You'll have to forgive him. He's addicted to twoofer addicts.
 
JihadJane said:
In MDC section debunkers use "Think of the orphans" moral, emotional blackmail in attempts to attract their food source (believers in the paranormal). In the CT section twoofer lovers use the death of three thousand people in New York to feed their addiction. It's strange to see desperate, hungry "critical thinkers" behaving Jehovah's Witnesses.
Click to expand...

Weasel words.

Just be straight with everyone this once:

#1] Do you believe KSM has been unjustly apprehended and charged?

and, if yes,

#2] What steps have you personally taken to assist his liberation from such injustice?

If, on the off chance, your answer to question #1 is "no", please just say so. No need to use weasel words. The question in the OP is very clear and concise. So are mine above. All you have to do is answer them.
 
Notice: JihadJane STILL didn't answer the question in the OP.

Report the post as off-topic.
 
Well, I've posted comments on several of the most popular truther vids (videos that typically get several comments a day) and the results, so far (about 10 hours after posting), are excellent.

People are either not commenting or responding by giving me their evidence about 9/11 being an inside job.
Only one responded directly about KSM, and he/she said that he/she would not be able to defend someone (in the legal sense) who has been detained without habeus corpus.

It's like giving garlic to a vampire.

Let's see what happens after a week...
 
I can't think of anything more important for closure to the events of 9/11 than this trial. This trial would go a long, long way toward ending the conspiratorial thinking that has endured since 9/11. It would be as if Jack Ruby missed his shot, and Lee Harvey Oswald sat in a courtroom with the evidence against him presented in front of a judge, jury and press.

There are lots of questions KSM could answer. For example, what was Flt 93's target? Was Flt 77 initially intended to hit the Pentagon or was it a secondary target? Was Flt 77's hijacker/pilot the best of the bunch, and was he selected because his was the most challenging flight manuever? Did you intend to cause the towers to completely collapse, or just inflict a lot of damage? Was Bldg 7 a target? What exactly was bin laden's involvement? Did you ever suspect that western intelligence agencies were aware of your plans, as has been alleged by conspiracy theorists? Why was Sept 11 selected as the date?

I for one hope that the objective evidence will show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that KSM, more than any other individual on the face of the earth, was responsible for the attacks of Sept 11, 2001. I sincerely hope that this does not end with KSM's suicide, but with a conviction. This is the last chance to get the story right for all of posterity. Let's not screw it up.
 
JihadJane, you seem to be under the illusion that debunkers are 'troofer addicts'. The fact of the matter is that we are the opposite.
Edited by chillzero: 
Edited for civility
 
Last edited by a moderator:
zorro99 said:
I can't think of anything more important for closure to the events of 9/11 than this trial. This trial would go a long, long way toward ending the conspiratorial thinking that has endured since 9/11. It would be as if Jack Ruby missed his shot, and Lee Harvey Oswald sat in a courtroom with the evidence against him presented in front of a judge, jury and press.

There are lots of questions KSM could answer. For example, what was Flt 93's target? Was Flt 77 initially intended to hit the Pentagon or was it a secondary target? Was Flt 77's hijacker/pilot the best of the bunch, and was he selected because his was the most challenging flight manuever? Did you intend to cause the towers to completely collapse, or just inflict a lot of damage? Was Bldg 7 a target? What exactly was bin laden's involvement? Did you ever suspect that western intelligence agencies were aware of your plans, as has been alleged by conspiracy theorists? Why was Sept 11 selected as the date?

I for one hope that the objective evidence will show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that KSM, more than any other individual on the face of the earth, was responsible for the attacks of Sept 11, 2001. I sincerely hope that this does not end with KSM's suicide, but with a conviction. This is the last chance to get the story right for all of posterity. Let's not screw it up.
Click to expand...

As the excited fervor of the mob above illustrates this is, as your words imply, primarily a show trial. The verdict is already decided. However, to expect "closure" from the secretive prosecution of a man held in solitary confinement for years and tortured is a bit naive. How can this produce "objective evidence"? An out-of-control US State has blown a major propaganda opportunity with its reckless and illegal behavior. The efforts of the faithful (see above) won't help! The world will laugh (and cry) at the US "justice" spectacle.

One has to wonder why the opinions of those variously considered to be subhuman, stupid, insane and needing to be treated like children are so important to 911 "critical thinkers". The kicks to be gained from twoofer hunting are crudely political, in the sense of satisfying a need to assert power and superiority, rather than representing a search for truth.

The truth about KSM would emerge from an exhaustive exploration of the relationships between international narco-trafficking, Intelligence agencies, the world of finance and banking, organized crime, non-State political groups and, of the course, the US/UK misguided and destructive, right-wing struggle to achieve global dominance.

Devoting energy, instead, to seeking answers to simplistic questions from the designated twoofer pets subgroup presents a sorry spectacle in comparison, far removed from any efforts to create a just world.


"... the methods and networks of real or perceived criminal entities can be useful."

US Army Special Operations Forces FM 3-05.130, ‘Unconventional Warfare’.

http://88.80.13.160/wiki/Unconventi...US_surrogates,_terrorists_and_narcotrafficers
 
Last edited:
Bananaman said:
JihadJane, you seem to be under the illusion that debunkers are 'troofer addicts'. The fact of the matter is that we are the opposite.
Edited by chillzero: 
Edited for civility
Click to expand...

Love, hate and dependency are frequently intertwined.
 
JihadJane, are you doing some ropey politics or sociology course at college? Because you sound like a fervent first year undergraduate with no outside frame of reference. I hope I'm wrong, but that's how you sound.

Actually, I hope I'm right. If it actually turns out that you're an adult then I despair.

You're in a mental straight-jacket. You have blinkers on and don't even know it. You're not a fundamentaist Muslim are you? That might explain it.

Bananaman (The Saddened.)
 
Last edited:
JihadJane said:
The truth about KSM would emerge from an exhaustive exploration of the relationships between international narco-trafficking, Intelligence agencies, the world of finance and banking, organized crime, non-State political groups and, of the course, the US/UK misguided and destructive, right-wing struggle to achieve global dominance.
Click to expand...

I'm afraid that the only question the court will consider is whether or not the man is guilty. Yes or no?
 
zorro99 said:
I'm afraid that the only question the court will consider is whether or not the man is guilty. Yes or no?
Click to expand...



Because of his treatment while is US custody it may be legally impossible to reach a verdict at all.

What kind of court is he being tried by?
 
Tandem Thinking said:
Only one responded directly about KSM, and he/she said that he/she would not be able to defend someone (in the legal sense) who has been detained without habeus corpus.
Click to expand...



So the reason he won't help a man who is being unjustly treated is that the man is being treated even more unjustly?


Uhm, yeah, that makes sense.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom