The PG Film - Bob Heironimus and Patty

Status
Not open for further replies.
makaya325 said:
Kitz, wouldnt my so called flaws be invalid?
Click to expand...

I know your too lazy to do it but that excuse is pretty lame. A good argument is a good argument no matter who it comes from. Same goes for bad. Anytime one of us makes a bad argument, another of us will point it out. We don't sacrifice critical thinking for back-patting like Bigfoot enthusiasts often do.
 
makaya325 said:
Who in the hell is anton?
Click to expand...

Dr. Anton Wroblewski, PhD in geology and ichnologist who did the analysis that blew the Skookum cast out of the water and showed it for the elk lay that is was.

You've been talking to him by his handle here, "desertyeti."

Friend of Matt Crowley and almost as good as me at poopy jokes.
 
William Parcher said:
A gif from Sweaty, and one from somebody else. Looks to me like the hand drags across the thigh and causes the fur to briefly poof.


[qimg]http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w28/SweatyYeti/Patty/Pattywalk59.gif[/qimg] [qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/07b0fc3c.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Im no expert but I think you will find that bulge is car keys and a little loose change.
A tip; Never keep loose change or keys in your pocket, It ruins the line of your trousers/pants
 
kitakaze said:
Dr. Anton Wroblewski, PhD in geology and ichnologist who did the analysis that blew the Skookum cast out of the water and showed it for the elk lay that is was.

You've been talking to him by his handle here, "desertyeti."

Friend of Matt Crowley and almost as good as me at poopy jokes.
Click to expand...

I agree no one holds a candle to your poopy jokes. Could you provide a link to the peer reviewed paper that Dr. Wroblewski published on the elk lay? I agree the Skookum cast was an elk lay and a published paper refuting it would seal the deal. If it was not published, why not?
 
mangler said:
Tube, what say you?

Mak doesn't seem to like Daegling, he also apparently has a problem with Anton (thou I'm reasonably certain he has no idea who he is), but, he really likes you.

Tube, is there a book in the future?



m
Click to expand...

Nah...

I think if you printed out the entirety of the Sasquatch portions of my website, you might be able to call it a pamphlet....

No, I'm content to give it all away for free.

In 2005 I was entranced by posting about Bigfoot on various forums, and I still do to some extent, but TAKEN AS A WHOLE the noise to signal ratio on controversial and/or Bigfoot related forums is often very high. If I find something interesting enough, I usually just add it to my website. Interest is still there, but novelty has largely worn off.
 
Óðinn said:
I agree no one holds a candle to your poopy jokes. Could you provide a link to the peer reviewed paper that Dr. Wroblewski published on the elk lay? I agree the Skookum cast was an elk lay and a published paper refuting it would seal the deal. If it was not published, why not?
Click to expand...

Simple reason it hasn't been published:
It's simply not a study that has any significant scientific value. In other words, there's a small population (dozens, possibly a hundred) that think it's a Bigfoot butt. Everyone else who's seen it; amateurs, professionals, and disinterested laypersons recognize it immediately as the impression of some 4-legged, hoofed animal, though they may not immediately recognize it as being an elk.
Scientific publication demands that a study be either:
1) of scientific value to a wide variety of researchers.
2) of great value to a modest degree of specialists.
3) of tremendous value to a very small group of highly specialized researchers.
The elk imprint falls into none of these categories.

If you're really interested in the nitty-gritty, pm me and I can give you a full rundown of exactly why this is more a study for sociologists and psychologists than animal imprint specialists.
 
DESERT YETI-
Is there a branch of biology, that can predict what types of species should be present in a certain area based on the DNA analysis of known species in the surrounding areas? Is it call Specific Biology or something like that?

I believe Dr. Joe Slowinski used this method to predict the existence of the Mandalayan Spitting Cobra.

If such a branch of Biology exists, is there anything that predicts a Bipedal Hairy Giant North American Primate should be existing in the woods of North America?
 
Last edited:
Drew,
That's something I know nothing about. Field biologists and ecologsists have all sorts of predictive models, analyses, and algorithms they can use to estimate the probability of populations and such.
Being as I mostly deal with the stuff they leave behind (prints, droppings, burrows, etc.), my knowledge of the other aspects of it are pretty pathetic.
Sorry.
 
Desert, are you aware that field biologists have found tracks of large proportions, indicating a heavy animal, which foot prints dont match any known species, except human, but have a big toe that extends outward and is usually flat footed
 
My bad, I misread Ichnologist, as Ichthyologist, and thought you were also a Biologist, thus the Biology question. The question still stands for any biologists out there.
 
makaya325 said:
Desert, are you aware that field biologists have found tracks of large proportions, indicating a heavy animal, which foot prints dont match any known species, except human, but have a big toe that extends outward and is usually flat footed
Click to expand...

Lets see what they found and their analysis
 
makaya325 said:
Desert, are you aware that field biologists have found tracks of large proportions, indicating a heavy animal, which foot prints dont match any known species, except human, but have a big toe that extends outward and is usually flat footed
Click to expand...

I was completely unaware of this.
Since they are large, we should call them "Largefoot"
Or possibly abbreviate "Tracks of Large and Impressive Proportions": TROLIP
 
Last edited:
makaya325 said:
Desert, are you aware that field biologists have found tracks of large proportions, indicating a heavy animal, which foot prints dont match any known species, except human, but have a big toe that extends outward and is usually flat footed
Click to expand...

Makaya - are you aware that 98.6% of all sasquatch believers are under 5 feet tall and are therefore psychologically compelled to believe in tall, mythical creatures?

Are you aware that sasquatch shaves its hair off once a year and goes into the strip lounges in Vancouver to drink beer and get lap-dances?

Are you aware that a recent poll discovered that sasquatch prefers Sockeye salmon over Pink Salmon because the red flesh of the Sockeye matched its eyeshine?
 
Rockin, no i wasnt aware. Are you aware sasquatch doesnt pay rent, doesnt shower, and sucks at cooking?
 
desertyeti said:
Simple reason it hasn't been published:
It's simply not a study that has any significant scientific value. In other words, there's a small population (dozens, possibly a hundred) that think it's a Bigfoot butt. Everyone else who's seen it; amateurs, professionals, and disinterested laypersons recognize it immediately as the impression of some 4-legged, hoofed animal, though they may not immediately recognize it as being an elk.
Scientific publication demands that a study be either:
1) of scientific value to a wide variety of researchers.
2) of great value to a modest degree of specialists.
3) of tremendous value to a very small group of highly specialized researchers.
The elk imprint falls into none of these categories.

If you're really interested in the nitty-gritty, pm me and I can give you a full rundown of exactly why this is more a study for sociologists and psychologists than animal imprint specialists.
Click to expand...
Thanks desertyeti. That says it all.
 
O, the skookum cast was examined by Sarmiento, and he doesnt think its an elk. Care to offer a counter arguement?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom