• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

So what really happened 2000 years ago?

Commonalities in the species is wrongfully induced as relatedness

Re: Chimpanzees
Debating endogenous retroviruses (ERV's) or telomere to telomere fusion to form human
chromosome 2 is futile for the creationism vs universal common descent argument (notice
I did not say 'evolution') because creationists expect to find even MORE similarities
between apes and humans because of biological morphology. We use the same data
to demonstrate the order in creation.

Pointing out similarities does not equal relatedness. The same would be true for
endosymbiont theory. Since the creationist believes they are observing God's Trademark
in creation, they expect the same uniform processes and consistency in the genetics
of creatures or "prokaryotes" who look similar. But commonalities do not always equal relatedness. Seeing this clearly is one of the first steps in dissent from the deception.
~Michael
 
on my ps3

Concerning geocentrism, Clement wrote in the first century of worlds beyond the sea, but his writings were eventually rejected.

As far as virgin birth, the god of Abraham had other children as well. He was also god of Babylon. And elsewhere.
 
Re: The Gospel of Mary

It doesn't make to much "skeptical" sense to go with a text that is discovered 1850 years
or more too late, but what "specifically" are you wanting to assert from the text?

IF you wish to take an Aramaic word from the so called "gospel of Phillip" (that was written in coptic) and falsely interpret it to mean something in English, THEN I would
claim that it does not speak to the significance of a text that is discovered in the
19th Century. You can't go back and change the way in which history was recorded.
Neither can you base an assertion from a word that is not in the original text because
it is the wrong language.

This is why Dan Brown is not taken seriously by any reputable scholar.
~Michael

Was there something specific from the gospel of Mary?
 
First, it comes from absolute sincerity of the heart and reverence to the Creator.
Humility is one of the most important steps in discovering truth. Jesus said that
unless you humble yourself as a little child, you will not see the Kingdom of God.
He also noted that God had hidden profound things from wise intellectual men and
had revealed truth to "babes."

1. Admit that you are a babe to the Creator. As a finite created being you are
indeed infinitely small to the Creator. It is logical to see yourself as a very small
child in comparison to God.
2. Don't be afraid to get down on your knees and pray to God to ask Him to "show"
you truth. Ask Him to open your eyes and your ears (spiritual ones) to the truth
of His Existence. There are many men of God who get down on their faces in humility
and recognize the absolute Holiness of God.
3. Recognize your tendency to do that which is opposed to the spirit of the law.
In this case it would be the 10 commandments. If you are tempted to break them
in thought as well as action, THEN the law is doing its job in teaching you that you
are a LawBreaker. In this case, a Law of God breaker.

Question everyting.

Ok, I will....

Why do you say in the first paragraph of this quote to have humility to discover the truth? This means to be humble and to be submissive. i.e. just accept the "truth". And then you follow with "Question everything"? You realize your contradicting yourself don't you?

Why would Jesus want you to humble yourself as a little child? Can't god's creation stand up to a little inquiry? If the universe is indeed god's creation, then inquiry will show that it is just as the Bible says it is. There would be no reason to just accept it as a child would.

Why would god want to hide 'profound things' from people who use their brains? Is it a sin to think?

Why is a child analogy used anyway. Although they are accepting, don't they also ask many questions?

As for your points...
Point 1. If we are finite and god is infinite, how is god fair and loving as he is described when he leaves your entire infinite fate in your hands during the finite time you live on Earth? We will spend an eternity in heaven or an eternity in hell based on our belief in god during the first ZERO percent of our life. Our state during the first 0% of our life would more correctly be referred to as an initial condition, or how we are created. Why does a fair and loving god reward or punish us for all eternity based on how we are created by him?

Point 2. What are these spiritual eyes and ears you refer too? Why did god give us physical eyes and ears if they can only deceive us? Why can't our physical eyes and ears convey his creation? If you are able to perceive with both physical and spiritual eyes and ears then you would be an ideal candidate for scientific testing of physical vs. spiritual sensory systems. I think it would be interesting to learn more about the spiritual world. Does spiritual visual information propagate at the speed of light? Can you create a spiritual sonic boom? How does it work? Would it be possible to construct a spiritual light/sound detector so that others can experience god? Would you submit yourself to scientific tests to find these answers?

Point 3. Isn't our 'tendency' to do things a reflection of how we are created? Again, why are we created in opposition to god's will? Why did god give the 10 commandments to only Moses? Were other civilizations around the world that were physically separated from Moses' people just supposed to burn in hell because of their ignorance for thousands of years until word of this particular god spread throughout the world?
 
The historical Jesus claimed His return would be from the clouds (sky) as was
His ascension (in clouds). This is to help us distinguish the real Messiah from a future
world president (or anti-Christ).
How do we distinguish him from skydivers, pilots or aliens?
 
The Return of Christ will be a global event

How do we distinguish him from skydivers, pilots or aliens?

The same way you distinguish between those two. Based on your uniform and repeated experience you can differentiate between them.

When Christ returns (above a mountain top in Israel)(Mt of Olives), it will be
for the purposes of saving Israel from distruction from world powers who
have turned against Israel. Almost all of the Christians will have already
been killed because they have refused to be apart of a world system which
involves a bar code or a computer chip or something else that is place on
their right hands or on their foreheads.

It will be a traumatic world event and everyone will know that this person
(Jesus) has authority. According to the scriptures He will send His angels
out to gather the people of the world together at Armageddon for judgement.

When He returns as judge instead of just Savior (He will be saving Israel as
a nation) it will be a scary time for those who know temporary life is finalized.

It will be a global event, just as Armageddon will be a global event.

~Michael
 
Answers

Ok, I will....

Why do you say in the first paragraph of this quote to have humility to discover the truth?

Pride blinds you to truth. Humility gives a capability to discover such
truth.


This means to be humble and to be submissive. i.e. just accept the "truth". And then you follow with "Question everything"? You realize your contradicting yourself don't you?

No. You demonstrate it is not a contradiction to question in humility.
Remember Who the Parent is in the analogy.

Why is a child analogy used anyway. Although they are accepting, don't they also ask many questions?

Be humble and submissive to God!!! Test truth in humility, NOT pride.
Recognize your finitude existence and the ease by which you can be
deceived, and particularly "self-deceived." Test all things and question
them, but when you question, make certain you are in submission to God.

Why would Jesus want you to humble yourself as a little child?

Because a child is not blinded by his or her own pride and (the child)recognizes his or her place in comparison to the adults. Who is the Only
adult in the analogy. The Infinite God.

Can't god's creation stand up to a little inquiry? If the universe is indeed god's creation, then inquiry will show that it is just as the Bible says it is.

There are 600 scientists who signed a dissent from Darwinism. Most of them
would claim that science never contradicts the true meaning of what scripture is asserting. Of course, the creation stands up to inquiry. Much
inquiry, "BUT" inquiry guided will solid assumptions. The first assumption being
that you are indeed studying creation.

There would be no reason to just accept it as a child would.

Often a child has to be content not to know. To actually "wait" for certain
answers. It is logical to ask many many questions, but who does the child
ask them to? The Parent? You see here, prayer is a logical thing to do.
Now no one is claiming you should accept Fideism. The issue here is that
the Parent is telling the child to "test" and learn, but IF the Parent has already told "other children" (prophets and apostles) THEN it would be
logical for the child to ask (read) the other children as well to try and
find the answer in humility. It is with a sincere heart that the Spirit of
God removes the blindness that can be created by pride.

Why would god want to hide 'profound things' from people who use their brains? Is it a sin to think?

Everyone thinks but not everybody listens. How can you listen when you
"think" you already have the answer? If the answer is wrong, then you
have "thought" yourself all the way to the wrong answer. Possibility is
often humankind's worst enemy when it comes to impractical confusion.
People ask "what if God is Satan and Satan is God?"This type of foolishness.
"What if there are trillions of possible universes?" instead of dealing with
the reality of the universe that they are living in, and how it is fine tuned
for life to be able to exist.

Back to your question. It is not a sin to think, but it IS a sin to not
trust the Creator. That "doubt" is considered cosmically illogical. IOW,
just as we discussed earlier with pride and humility: pride is illogical and
humility is logical (infinitely small and dependent on the Creator), so also
"faith" in God is logical and "doubt" is cosmically illogical. This is the result
of a severed relationship, perhaps (between God and mankind), but none-
the-less it is still illogical to not trust God (place your faith in Him as your
heavenly Father and seek Him for ultimate truth).

God is opposed to that which is illogical (pride, distrust), and rewards that
which is logical (humility, faith). We often use the English word "hate" to
explain the concept of "opposed to."

Why is a child analogy used anyway. Although they are accepting, don't they also ask many questions?

It is good to ask a lot of questions from your Parent (God the Father). Where
do you think He has said many of the answers are (the Law and the Prophets?). The bottom line is that the "child" knows his place. That is why
Jesus used the child analogy. Because cosmically, we are ALL children in
comparison to Infinite God.

I am having difficulty retaining these posts and sending them to the thread.
For some reason I keep losing the long explanatory ones, to other individuals
who have asked me to explain so I will start answering in sections, hopefully.

~Michael
 
<another major snip>
I am having difficulty retaining these posts and sending them to the thread.
For some reason I keep losing the long explanatory ones, to other individuals
who have asked me to explain so I will start answering in sections, hopefully.

~Michael
.
No, no, that's alright!
Losing the long "explanatory" threads does us all a favor.
If you could lose them -before- their initial posting, everyone would be much happier.
 
I am having difficulty retaining these posts and sending them to the thread.
For some reason I keep losing the long explanatory ones, to other individuals
who have asked me to explain so I will start answering in sections, hopefully.
It would also help if you used the Quote button (bottom right) when replying. It makes it easier to keep track.
 
[B]cj.23[/B] said:
I am having difficulty retaining these posts and sending them to the thread.
For some reason I keep losing the long explanatory ones, to other individuals
who have asked me to explain so I will start answering in sections, hopefully.

It would also help if you used the Quote button (bottom right) when replying. It makes it easier to keep track. It would also help if you used the Quote button (bottom right) when replying. It makes it easier to keep track.
[/quote]

Something wrong here. :) I never wrote that!
cj x
 
Last edited:
point 1.

Point 1. If we are finite and god is infinite, how is god fair...

Everything in life should have taught you by now that there can be
no "fair." Everyone is in different circumstances, if you are a parent
with multiple children all different ages and abilities, you understand
the point quite clearly. There can really be no "fair." There is a saying
in Christianity "God is Just, He is not fair. If He was fair then He would
send us all to hell." This is based on the incomplete understanding of
fairness and the English word "deserve." Often Christians will say that
"if God were fair, He would give us all what we deserve, and that is
hell." Often Pastor admit that they deserve to go to hell based on
their sinful actions, and that everyone who has sinned "deserves" to
go to hell. BUT this is a misunderstanding of the word "deserves."
It comes from Romans 3:23 BTW. It is saying that true "fairness"
rewards only based on performance, and that based on our performances
we ALL should be separated from a Holy God.

Re: fairness and deserve
It is much more sophisticated, and yet God Himself would set the
standard for the merits of what is "deserved." There can be no fairness
because everyone is in different circumstances.

and loving as he is described

Yes. Willing to gather Israel like a hen gathers her chicks under her wing.
A loving Father Who would "run" to meet and embrace the prodigal son
who has come to his senses (after humility in the pig's pen, BTW).

when he leaves your entire infinite fate in your hands

It is more than just this pragmatic understanding. First of all, we are not
puppets, we are created in God's Image for the purposes of eternal fellowship
with God IF we receive the gift of salvation (logical trusting of God to provide
redemption). We have volition. The ability to make choices, but those
choices are ultimately based on a variety of circumstances (including our
knowledge - this is why Jesus said "you shall know the truth and the truth
shall set you free) and the ability to reject God our Creator and reject His
gift of Love and Salvation.

It was often said, in true love "you can't say yes, if you can't say no." This
is part of the reason also by which God did not make us puppets, but desired
to create us in His Image for fellowship. He "gives" to us and we "thank" Him
in worship. This is logical. Just as it is logical for a painting to glorify an artist, so also it is logical for the creation to glorify the Creator and when we
worship God (fellowship with Him and thank Him for what He has done in our
lives) we are completed as His Children in the Parent/Child (Father/Son or daughter) relationship.

during the finite time you live on Earth?

Yes, mathematically this will approach zero for all of eternity and yet our
choices here at the beginning of time affect ALL of eternity. Ultimately,
there is a seemingly infinite set of circumstances which can affect your
decisions here on earth, SO the question becomes "What is a true choice?"

Something I look forward to discussing later.

We will spend an eternity in heaven or an eternity in hell based on our belief in god during the first ZERO percent of our life.

Yes. Everything in life should teach us right now that there are consequences for our actions. Eternal consequences when you think about
it cosmically. If you jump off a cliff and gravity becomes your worst friend,
it is an event that will affect all of eternity and history. Everything does, people just do not realize it because they live sort of this fantasy life where
"death" is the final reality.


Our state during the first 0% of our life would more correctly be referred to as an initial condition, or how we are created.

Here is the first misunderstanding. Within the closed set of assumptions
of Christianity we are first created in the state of fellowship with God and
our condition is "good"(not perfect because you can not have perfection
without experience and knowledge that is consistent with the perfect
Creator's omniscience). So God created us (Adam and Eve) with "choice"
but without a knowledge of "evil." (or the standard of "good" because
they did not really KNOW {through experience} God and that it was
always completely logical to choose and obey God). So the real question
becomes, "why did God create Adam and Eve "ignorant" of good and evil?"

Answer.

There was no "actual" evil.

Question everything.

"Evil" at this point in creation was only conceptual. Adam and Eve were
created before the fall of Lucifer to Satan, so evil was only a conceptual
potential bi product of choice at this point, it did not exist in practice.
God is light and in Him there is no darkness at all. God did not create
evil, contrary to what the hyper calvinist or the universalist believes.

It is illogical for God to create something evil, just as it is illogical for God
to create evil itself. Although the Tanakh refers to God has forming light
and creating darkness, as well as both good and calamity coming forth
from God, God did not actually create evil. Evil was a potential bi product
of choice.

It was, however, inevitable. (which can be discussed later)

So the question becomes "is it "possible" to not be ignorant of evil" if evil
or disobedience does not exist yet? Do you have to experience disobedience
in order to know that it is bad? Can a baby learn without correction? Without
mistakes?

Why does a fair and loving god reward or punish us for all eternity based on how we are created by him?

This is what is called a pseudo question because it is a question with a false
assumption. petitio principii "How do you know we were created in a state
that we are judged by?" The fact is, there can be no fair only "grace."
Different levels of grace for different circumstances to which we are ALL born
under. Also, the state we are born under is the result of disobedience, it is
not exactly how God created us. Now it is true that Adam's choice condemned us all (since we are his offspring), but the scriptures teach us
that Christ can buy us BACK {out of condemnation}to God and make us no
longer condemned but forgiven.

Now, you may object, "I never chose to be born!" (under Adam's disobedience). Once again, just like "fairness" this comes back to logical
possibility. If we are eternal spirits created in God's Image then "How can
God create an eternal spirit and ask them, "do you want to be created?"
and then annihilate them if they are truly eternal, or if there is a logic by
which God is bound which prevents God from doing what is illogical? (creating
someone in His Image who is not really eternal?)

This all comes down to the "real" problems of creating beings in God's Image
who are eternal, and how evil is a problem for those who could actually choose
disobedience.

Not the problem of explaining evil which we can go into in more detail.
~Michael
 
It is completely illogical to conclude common
descent with those who do not have the same capacities, especially when
you have no mechanism from which to bring those capacities into existence.

You deny that those capacities are brought in to existence by an expression of our DNA?
 
Point 2 and Point 1 still incomplete

Why does a fair and loving god reward or punish us for all eternity based on how we are created by him?

So to rephrase the question "Why does a Just and Loving God reward or
punish us for all of eternity based on our circumstances which seem
beyond our control?"

First of all, God's Justice is inclusive of the Grace which He gives by providing
a universe with redemption. Second, it is because of "Love" (God's mental
attitude toward mankind) that God became a Man and provided that redemption through the Perfect Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross. Third, often
there are circumstances that ARE beyond our control and this is why those
who are separated from God are not punished equally (other than eternal
separation which is indeed horrible and unthinkable, but still a reality for those
who die with sin). There are different levels of punishment for different levels of
wrongful behavior. Hitler will be punished more severely than say a modern
day intellectual who never repents. Fourth, it is because that God is a Holy God and His
Perfect Nature can not tolerate our sin. He separates Himself from us (creating a place called "hell') because our transgressions are the result of
cosmic illogic (disobedience to the Owner and Sustainer of the Universe).
The scriptures teach us that He desires all people to be saved, BUT there
is still a decision or a choice to love God that needs to be made.

This is the road to receiving Grace, and not being separated from the God
Who was willing to save you should you have repented. There is also the
understanding of election through circumstances and the concept of Infinite
Determinism (which is somewhat different from Determinism)where God's Will
is so Infinitely above us that it is inclusive of our absolute volition in certain
circumstances and this is not a contradiction.

Point 2. What are these spiritual eyes and ears you refer too?

Certainly the soul or the spirit does not have physical ears and eyes so it
is an analogy of having knowledge and learning about God through humility
and seeking Him, rather than being blinded by invalid assumptions and pride.

Why did god give us physical eyes and ears if they can only deceive us?[?QUOTE]

Pseudo question. It is not the physical eyes and ears that deceive us
but rather invalid assumptions that lead us to "error." It is all about
interpretation. Assumptions + data (observation) = Conclusion or interpretation. Where you end up in your belief is based on what you
start with. That is why we need to always ask "What is this based on?"

Why can't our physical eyes and ears convey his creation?

For millions who start with correct assumptions, the creation reveals the
truth of God to them. But this is only physical observation. In the flesh,
we are blind to the spiritual world.


If you are able to perceive with both physical and spiritual eyes and ears then you would be an ideal candidate for scientific testing of physical vs. spiritual sensory systems.

I think it would be interesting to learn more about the spiritual world.
Where do you think the logical source for this would be?

Does spiritual visual information propagate at the speed of light?

Clearly, "sight" in this context is about receiving knowledge and not "seeing"
three dimensional perception like a retina. How fast does spiritual information
travel? We will have to wait until the next life to find the answer to that
question.

Can you create a spiritual sonic boom? How does it work? Would it be possible to construct a spiritual light/sound detector so that others can experience god?

The way in which you experience God is through His Holy Spirit. This is
something you can also pray sincerely for. You do not experience God with
something tantamount to photons. (or spiritual photons - no such thing).

Would you submit yourself to scientific tests to find these answers?

To me personally it would be somewhat of a meaningless experiment. Who
would conduct such an experiment? Someone who does not believe in the
spiritual world in the first place? How can you test the spirit with physical
or tangible elements? This does not sound very practical to me.

~Michael
 
Re: The Gospel of Mary

It doesn't make to much "skeptical" sense to go with a text that is discovered 1850 years
or more too late, but what "specifically" are you wanting to assert from the text?

IF you wish to take an Aramaic word from the so called "gospel of Phillip" (that was written in coptic) and falsely interpret it to mean something in English, THEN I would
claim that it does not speak to the significance of a text that is discovered in the
19th Century. You can't go back and change the way in which history was recorded.
Neither can you base an assertion from a word that is not in the original text because
it is the wrong language.

This is why Dan Brown is not taken seriously by any reputable scholar.
~Michael

Was there something specific from the gospel of Mary?

Is this to me?

Clement, the third bishop of rome wrote that in first epistle.

The rest can be found in the bible.

Never read Mary. Please continue.
 
Last edited:
Breckmin.


Your posts are filled with fallacies. You are not using logic or critical thinking. You are simply tossing the term about, borrowing its cachet, but not using the tool itself.

First and worst is your constant begging the question. You make your arguments from the assumption that god exists. This is not logic but illogic. I can say exactly the same things you do, but I can substitute any other term, and it would all still make exactly the same sort of sense, which is to say, none at all.

I did read your reply to me, and thank you for it, but unfortunately, you did not explain how it works...or rather, you did not explain how I will know it works. You ony told me how to do it, what instructions I must first obey.

I did all you suggest, or require, for many years. Now, humans are results-oriented: when we do a thing, we want results, meaning a change from the status-quo to something new, or different. I got no results. I got none of the results I was told I could expect. And when I said so, I was told I must have "done it wrong." God being perfect, the fault couldn't possibly lie with god, so it had to lie with me. I have been told the problem is that I expected god to perform. I only expected it because I was told he promised to perform. If that's not so, then why preach it?

What real sense does that make, logically? "You can expect good things from god, but if you actually go so far as to expect them, you won't get them." What??

In actuality, the simpler explanation is that I was beseeching nothing. Nothing is there to hear me, and it doesn't matter how much I believe, how fervent I get, or how faithful I feel I am, there is still nothing there to hear me.

Further, you still haven't told me what it means to be protected from that which is not true, if as you say, I still have to do my own thinking. Then where's the protection? What's the point? If I have to do my own thinking, with or without a god, then what's god for? Decoration?

To be protected is a passive endeavor. I should have to do nothing. That I have to jump through hoops and still never get the treat when I perform means I stop performing.

Now, carry on with what you're saying, but do remember: you are violating logic with every post, and would do yourself some good to, at the very least, explore the fallacies and try to eliminate them from your reasoning. Then, you will be on your way to using logic as a tool. At the moment, all you're doing is borrowing its coat, and it doesn't fit your arguments at all.
 
Human Consciousness, spiritual regeneration

You deny that those capacities are brought in to existence by an expression of our DNA?

The spiritual world is not part of our DNA, but RNA/DNA DO prove to us that
there is an INFORMATION giver, or a programmer to the code.
A good example is gene regulation in E.coli discovered by Jacques Monod.
In lac operon IF lactose is present and IF glucose is absent, THEN beta-
galactosidase and permease. The two part control mechanism makes certain
that B-galactosidase, galactose permease and transacetylase are only
produced when needed. Fascinating algorithm. As we learn more about the
code and the way in which it works we will find more characteristics of programming which will continue to point to intelligence.

Sound assumption based on deduction and uniform and repeated experience.

Proof requires honesty on the part of the person you are showing evidence to.

As far as the original question is concerned, I do not believe that the soul
or spirit of an individual is an expression of our DNA, but it IS a result of our
DNA which defines who we are biologically. Since I believe that spiritual
regeneration is transcendant and above the materialistic tangible existence
of organic flesh, I would say that the human consciousness is NOT "limited"
to mere DNA.
~Michael
 
Proof requires honesty on the part of the person you are showing evidence to.

No, it doesn't. Proof is proof, regardless of the honesty or mendacity of the one you're showing it to. You can't make someone accept your proof, but that doesn't change it.

For instance: I know your sweater is in the next room. And, in fact, there are only these two rooms. You tell me you know it's not there, that I should prove it is.

So, we get up, and we go into the next room. There is your sweater, as I said. Oh, but no, you say, that's not your sweater; it's someone else's. Okay. I pick up the sweater and show you the label where you wrote your name on it last winter. I show you the stain I put on the sleeve when I got it too close to the bleach one wash day. I show you the burn hole your mother accidentally put in it last week with her cigarette. This is your sweater, and couldn't possibly be an identical sweater with identical markings that happened to appear in the room.

You don't care, you still insist it's not your sweater. And you are lying.

How did my proof change due to your mendacity?

It's much easier to learn logic and then use it, than the other way around.
:D
 
Point 3.

Point 3. Isn't our 'tendency' to do things a reflection of how we are created?]/QUOTE]

We need to differentiate between progressive result or our current state
of actuality, and the way in which we were first created. IF Adam was
created without such a "tendency" THEN we need to understand "how"
we ended up with such a tendency. Is it just the result of judgement?
Or is there more to it? Particularly when it comes to a "need" to know
that the tendency is a bad thing. IOW, "if" creatures of volition will fail
because of a lack of knowledge that is consistent with God's omnipotence,
THEN how do we get that knowledge and experience to those creatures
so that they will NOT fail in a future eternal state?


Again, why are we created in opposition to god's will?
There is a difference between being "born" into a state where
you are in opposition to God's nature, and being originally created in His Image
with a purpose of eternal fellowship (to fulfill the Father/Child relationship).
Neither is in opposition to God's Infinite Determining Will, but perhaps your
question is in opposition to God's present Desired Will in that He would Desire
a universe that did not contain illogic (disobedience to the Creator and Owner
of the Universe). By creating beings of "choice," they can actually choose
illogic at some point in time, and that illogic will logically separate them from
the God Who is bound by logical justice and logical consequences. So we
are not "created" into opposition of God's Will, but rather born into a world
that is plagued with a potential bi product of choice (or in this case, illogical
choice = to go against the Infinite Owner of the Universe's Desired Will) that
is why the Law is given, to expose this characteristic in us. That we have
a sin nature or tendency to break the law, which makes us all law breakers.
Romans 3:23.

Why did god give the 10 commandments to only Moses?
Just as Adam failed to trust God and chose to "die with Eve" (whom he loved
dearly) rather than live with God, so also Abraham chose to trust God and
have "faith." It is said that "Abraham believed God and it was reckoned to
Him as righteousness." The Hebrews were the result of Abraham, and his
"faith" and trusting in God. As a result of this "faith," the ancient Hebrews
were God's chosen nation. Moses was apart of God's Chosen Nation and God
gave him the 10 commandments to give to the nation of Israel. Moses helped
lead them out of Egypt, and this is often seen as a model for the believer to
be lead out of the slavery of this current (fleshly) world that we live in.
If you are saying, "it's not fair!" what about all of the other people throughout
the world? Why did God specifically choose Israel.You need to remember
that this is a physical salvation and revelation, and that TRUE salvation
comes from individual accountability to the Creator, and individual "faith."
Perhaps the wording of this is somewhat reckless, but the point here is that
just because you were a Hebrew did not mean that you were looking to God
for salvation and actually "loved" God.
So why did God choose a whole nation based on one man's faith (Abraham)?
To show us that salvation starts with "faith" perhaps? I do not know for
certain. I WILL say that there is no way to claim that the Infinite Owner of
the Universe in anyway did anything "wrong" because there is no standard
by which to judge God.


Were other civilizations around the world that were physically separated from Moses' people just supposed to burn in hell because of their ignorance for thousands of years until word of this particular god spread throughout the world?

It is believed that even many among the Hebrews will suffer the same
fate because they missed the spirit of the law, and what redemption was
really about (faith and trusting in God, NOT works which are a product of
believe and something you will be rewarded by, but the Only work that
can buy your salvation is the Holy Work of Messiah and His Sacrifice to
be the perfect lamb to pay for such ignorance).
So what about all those cultures before the Cross of Jesus? What about
all those millions of people before Abraham? Were they not separated by
God because of their sin??? Yes. But the real question is "how does God
judge before the Cross, and apart from the Cross?" We have a saying,
"Will not the God of Abraham do the right and just thing?" If He judges
each one individually, perhaps there are those whom the Cross will apply
to because of their "faith" in God (trusting the Creator) and Christ knows
who those individuals are.

Often it is said, "don't worry about all those around you persihing..."Worry
about yourself, because you and you alone are accountable to God." Now
we think that that is callous BUT if you are on a sinking ship and someone
throws you a life jacket are you going to say, "hey, why doesn't everyone
else get a life line??" Perhaps if you have no fear of eternal drowning and you
wish to perish will billions then perhaps you will refuse to grab the life line
that will pull you to safety, but to me this is not an excuse if you know
you are actually in the middle of the ocean (sin). If you do not think you
are sinful, then how can you repent? So is it "fair" to those who were
not Israelites or Hebrews, who never got the law? My question is whoever
said life could be "fair?" People win the lottery. If I say "it's not fair" I am
being evasive to circumstances that make each person different. What if
a person refuses to take a winning lottery ticket based on the fact that
children have died of starvation in Africa?

Why not take the winning lottery ticket and go share it with them and
maybe change their eternal state as well?...
~Michael
 
Test all things and question
them, but when you question, make certain you are in submission to God.
Glad to see we're on the same page then. So we're in agreement that you want to practice skepticism, except when it comes to god. Since this is a skepticism forum, and the subforum is religion, I will not debate with you the merits of skepticism within any subject - especially religion were we are now. I suggest you find another venue.

I will comment on this however...
Yes, mathematically this will approach zero for all of eternity and yet our
choices here at the beginning of time affect ALL of eternity. Ultimately,
there is a seemingly infinite set of circumstances which can affect your
decisions here on earth, SO the question becomes "What is a true choice?"
As I said, it's not a choice. It's our initial condition. One which, if we were created by god, would be presumably set by god.

You cannot argue that we have time on earth to make a decision one way or another. That's like when triplets are born, one will be born first, one will be born second, and then the third one. After 2 minutes, the first one born will be expected to choose a career because he's been around the longest. And even that is a ridiculously simplistic analogy. We're not talking a few minutes vs. several decades. We're talking about a few decades vs eternity. What percentage is that? Say you live 80 years. 80/infinity = 0%. Whatever maturity we gain through the time we are here on earth is NOTHING compared to an eternity. Say we were around for 10^80 years. That is still nothing compared to an eternity. It's like you said:
As a finite created being you are indeed infinitely small to the Creator.


DrBalter said:
Why does a fair and loving god reward or punish us for all eternity based on how we are created by him?
This is what is called a pseudo question because it is a question with a false
assumption. petitio principii "How do you know we were created in a state
that we are judged by?"
I've already explained this, so the question stands.
 

Back
Top Bottom