• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

How 9/11 was done

9/11-investigator said:
I have spend some time watching (for the 2nd time) and annoting this video 911 Mysteries Part 1 - Demolitions (90 minutes):
Click to expand...

Nicely rote-learned. You're a good little sheep. But why do you take this as gospel? If you were really an investigator, you'd apply the same level of skepticism to both sides of the argument, whereas you've simply chosen to believe uncritically in anything told to you by a conspiracy theorist. Are you unable to think for yourself?

Dave
 
9/11-investigator said:
After viewing this video one is left with a reinforced absolute certainty that these 3 WTC towers were deliberately brought down.

[...]

the endless earwitness accounts of explosions everywhere in the buildings
...and all the rest.
Click to expand...

9/11-investigator said:
Very true, not explosives.
Click to expand...



cake3be7.jpg
 
Dr Adequate said:
Splendid. Let us know if there's anything in there that you are too ill-informed to debunk, and we'll help you out.
Click to expand...

Wonderful, I knew I could rely on you.

Why did the core come down? Either your opinion or absent one debunker orthodoxy please. If possible in your own words or quotes of limited size. Thanks in advance.

I say they came down due to CD (no surprise here).
 
Dr Adequate said:
[qimg]http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/1222/cake3be7.jpg[/qimg]​
Click to expand...

Thanks for the cake, it was delicious. It probably came with a message which I missed, something from your Kulturkreis possibly.

I need to clarify a bit: I used the concept of 'explosives' somewhat loosely, not in the sense that it necessarily bangs, but more like everything that demolishes stuff. I have no detailed concept of how the towers were brought down (nobody has except the perps), except that at least the 47 core columns somehow were sliced, either with a bang or with a whisper, so to say. I am open to the possibility that additional explosives were used to weaken other parts as well (trusses), given the testimonies of regular office workers of all the dust that was present in the office in the morning.
 
9/11-investigator said:
Wonderful, I knew I could rely on you.
Click to expand...
I cannot return the compliment.

I cannot rely on you from one minute to the next to claim that the towers were brought down with explosives or without explosives.

Why did the core come down? Either your opinion or absent one debunker orthodoxy please.
Click to expand...
"Absent one debunker orthodoxy"? But this restrains me from saying anything that is known to be true.

I can of course explain why the towers came down, but my explanation does involve me saying stuff that is known to be true.

I say they came down due to CD (no surprise here).
Click to expand...
No, no surprise. Now try to argue for CD "absent one Truther orthodoxy".
 
"Either your opinion or absent one debunker orthodoxy please."

meant:

"either your opinion or if you do not have an opinion than please give me the debunker orthodox opinion".
 
9/11-investigator said:
"Either your opinion or absent one debunker orthodoxy please."

meant:

"either your opinion or if you do not have an opinion than please give me the debunker orthodox opinion".
Click to expand...
Oh, I didn't realize you didn't know.

Planes crashed into the towers, which caught fire.
 
Last edited:
Hey 9/11-investigator, I see that you are online right now. What was the mechanism for the initiation of the collapses of the towers according to NIST? Please hurry and answer this and don't use google.
 
Dr Adequate said:
Oh, I didn't realize you didn't know.

Planes crashed into the towers, which caught fire.
Click to expand...

May I assume that you hold the same opinion as one of the other regulars who opined that the kerosine from the plane was burned in a couple of minutes and that afterwards the fire was continued by consuming paper, curtains, carpets, etc.?
 
Me said:
As to the Twin Towers being brought down by controlled demoltion: 100% wrong. So you might begin to ask yourself why you would "believe" something that is impossible.
Click to expand...
9/11-investigator said:
Huh, buildings are demolished in a controlled way all the time. And the knackers even get paid for it.
Click to expand...
Please try again. I did not assert that buildings are not "demolished in a controlled way all the time." I wrote that any suggestion the Twin Towers were demolished in that fashion on 9/11/2001 is not taking into account its impossibility.
 
9/11-investigator said:
May I assume that you hold the same opinion as one of the other regulars who opined that the kerosine from the plane was burned in a couple of minutes and that afterwards the fire was continued by consuming paper, curtains, carpets, etc.?
Click to expand...
Yes, it does seem as though the jet fuel acted as an accelerant (how could it not?) and of course it was not the only combustible material in the towers (how could it be?)
 
dtugg said:
Hey 9/11-investigator, I see that you are online right now. What was the mechanism for the initiation of the collapses of the towers according to NIST? Please hurry and answer this and don't use google.
Click to expand...

So? I know that you've read this. Why no answer?
 
Dr Adequate said:
Yes, it does seem as though the jet fuel acted as an accelerant (how could it not?) and of course it was not the only combustible material in the towers (how could it be?)
Click to expand...

Good. Would you not agree with me that during the first minutes the conditions on several floors resembled an inferno that quickly became a lot less intense?
 
I think it is safe to assume that 9/11-investigator doesn't even know the "official story" of how the collapses happened yet he is comfortable calling the experts at NIST lying shills. Awesome!
 
9/11-investigator said:
Wrong.

For starters, the original Peter was obviously a Jew.

Here a link to the very Jewish Schiff family: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Schiff --> several Peters.

To top it of: http://www.jewfaq.org/jnames.htm
For obvious reasons, names like Christopher, Christine and Jesus are almost unheard of among Jews and Mary is unusual, but names like Peter and Paul that you would think of as very Christian are surprisingly common among Jews.






I already pointed to several instances of Jewish people called Zalewski. I could have added hundreds more.
Click to expand...

Most Jews who post on the internet use "9/11-investigator" as their name.
 
9/11-investigator said:
Good. Would you not agree with me that during the first minutes the conditions on several floors resembled an inferno that quickly became a lot less intense?
Click to expand...

As per usual you are not in possession of any facts.

WTC 1, South Face, 8:55am - 9 minutes after impact
10252493986ad76648.jpg


WTC 1, South Face, 9:19am - 33 minutes after impact
10252493986adc251a.jpg


Which is more intense?

Any response to post 756?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom