• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The PG Film - Bob Heironimus and Patty

Status
Not open for further replies.
William Parcher wrote:
The shoulders don't lie, and they will tell you who is the liar. Isn't that right, Sweety?
Click to expand...


But wait........there's more....;)....the length in-between a person's arms can't be expanded significantly with a padded suit (padding would, in fact, decrease the length), and still allow for a natural arm motion....


PattyWideBody3.jpg
BobH11.jpg




Pattywalk55A.gif



But the (huge :D ) problem for Bob is, that he needs quite a bit of that expansion, in-between his arms (that is, his arms would need to be significantly further apart) in order for him to fit inside of Patty's extra-wide body, and have his arms appear to be hanging straight down, and also have a natural-looking motion to his arm swing.
 
Last edited:
Comparing Roger with Patty, again....with Patty's full width outlined...


PattyWideBody3.jpg
PattysBigFeet2.jpg




Gee, it's a good thing that Roger got a steady shot of Patty from directly behind, isn't it?
 
Meanwhile......Correa's digging through his pictures of Barney and Baby-Bop......looking for answers. :p
 
SweatyYeti said:
Hey...I got some super bad news for Bob Heironimus, and his followers....:)....courtesy of this still frame...
Click to expand...

Bob Heironimus is my Muad'Dib. He is the educator, the One Who Leads the Way. I have a Heironimus locket in my pocket and I say three Hail Bobs everday.

SweatyYeti is the Antibob.
 
kitakaze said:
That's so weird considering how they walk exactly the same. Bob is just living the lie 24/7.
Click to expand...


You're right, kitty...he is 'living the lie'.


As for his walk....I haven't seen Bob walking exactly like Patty, so I don't know where you got that from.

The bottom line is....if he can't fit into Patty's dimensions....he can't be Patty.
 
SweatyYeti said:
You're right, kitty...he is 'living the lie'.
Click to expand...

I think that is what one must need to do when beating polygraphs. Polygraphs aren't reliable evidence so nevermind.

As for his walk....I haven't seen Bob walking exactly like Patty, so I don't know where you got that from.
Click to expand...

Here you go via Atomic via tirademan:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyP6i-0e5Y8

The bottom line is....if he can't fit into Patty's dimensions....he can't be Patty.
Click to expand...

I don't see anything here that eliminates Heironimus being in the suit. I do like it when you draw lines on things.
 
Here is a better video of Bob H. walking....at the 1:25 and 2:15 marks...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWtUVG-ermU


I see a few differences between his walk and Patty's....and very little, if any, difference between Bob's walk and anyone else's walk.


One thing of note, though, is when you see Bob walking from the frontal view...at the 2:15 mark...his arms aren't nearly as far away (in the horizontal direction, that is) from the outer edge of his foot as Patty's arms are. (Which is what I was refering to in my earlier post.)

This significant fact is what will finally sink Bob's Battleship....for good. :)

BTW...I'll use stills from that video for comparisons later, when I'm able to download and use Youtube files.
 
Last edited:
Here you go...

I transferred the line across Patty's torso over to Bob...


PattyWideBody3.jpg
BobH15Line.jpg



The white line on Patty is highlighting the distance in-between her arms, with her arms hanging mostly straight down.

But on Bob, the line runs well beyond his chest-width, and across most of his arms.....with his elbows held away from his body.

Now, how could Bob possibly have had the natural, smooth, realistic-looking arm movement seen in this clip, when his arms would have to have been spread apart even more than what we see in the picture above???...:boggled:...


Pattywalk55A.gif



Answer....he couldn't. He didn't.
 
Sweaty, you have no expertise in photography at all let alone blowing up pictures of a man in a suit and comparing it with another subject. Now please do everyone a favor and take some courses or just give up on what you perceive to be something there when it is not. You're starting to sound like your ready to lose any marbles that you have left.


I Am He
 
Happy Thanksgiving, I Am He!! :)

And to everyone else, here!


I'd like to take this opportunity to say that I'm very thankful that Roger was able to get a good, steady ;) shot of Patty from directly behind....since this view shows us the true, and extreme, width of her body.

Speaking of which....this was Grover Krantz' take on Patty's width....courtesy of Wikipedia:


Krantz pointed out the tremendous width of the creature's shoulders, which (after deducting 1" for hair) he estimated at 28.2 inches, or 35.1% of its full standing height of 78". (Or a higher percentage of its 72" "walking height," which was a bit stooped, crouched, and sunk into the sand (Krantz, 106-08).)

The creature's shoulders are almost 50% wider than the human mean.

(For instance, André the Giant had a typical human ratio of 24%. Wide-shouldered Bob Heironimus (see below) has 27.4%. Only very rarely do humans have a shoulder breadth of 30%.)

Krantz argued that a suited person could not mimic this breadth and still have the naturalistic hand and arm motions present on the film.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
SweatyYeti said:
Here is a better video of Bob H. walking....at the 1:25 and 2:15 marks...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWtUVG-ermU


I see a few differences between his walk and Patty's....and very little, if any, difference between Bob's walk and anyone else's walk.
Click to expand...

What an interesting subjective opinion from a Bigfoot enthusiast. What I find more interesting is having shown various people both the PGF and Bob Heironimus walking without making any comments beforehand and then immediately seeing the same walk.


One thing of note, though, is when you see Bob walking from the frontal view...at the 2:15 mark...his arms aren't nearly as far away (in the horizontal direction, that is) from the outer edge of his foot as Patty's arms are. (Which is what I was refering to in my earlier post.)

This significant fact is what will finally sink Bob's Battleship....for good. :)

BTW...I'll use stills from that video for comparisons later, when I'm able to download and use Youtube files.
Click to expand...

You think Bob looks smaller out of the suit. That's fine. I still don't see anything that actually eliminates him being in the suit. Can you make an objective factual demonstration?
 
SweatyYeti said:
Here you go...

I transferred the line across Patty's torso over to Bob...
Click to expand...

How does that mean anything at all? The following explanation means nothing:

The white line on Patty is highlighting the distance in-between her arms, with her arms hanging mostly straight down.

But on Bob, the line runs well beyond his chest-width, and across most of his arms.....with his elbows held away from his body.

Now, how could Bob possibly have had the natural, smooth, realistic-looking arm movement seen in this clip, when his arms would have to have been spread apart even more than what we see in the picture above???...:boggled:...


[qimg]http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w28/SweatyYeti/Pattywalk55A.gif[/qimg]


Answer....he couldn't. He didn't.
Click to expand...

I think you're image comparison is highly flawed. What did you think of Astrophotographer's measurements of the PGF subject?
 
Sweaty, how about you put on a heavily padded bigfoot suit and see if you can walk with your arms close to your body?

Be sure to get back to us with the results.

Thanks
 
I note the floppy, hanging, pendant, breasts on this drawing, and Roger's statements about Patty's breasts vs Patty's actual breasts.


1966patterson4gp.jpg



Roger's statements match the drawing, but not Patty.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom