I still don't get the point?
Why the heck blaming Israel/the Jews/etc?
Kudos to all the responds and not a single stoner joke.
So all you need to proof your theory true is to dreg a chunk of the Elbe, and the greatest conspiracy is proven true?
Gosh thats awesome.
Really?Why blame the muslims.
I do not blame Israel or the Jews. I say that everything points to a small conspiracy of a small number of Israelis and double passport Americans.
This in summary is the plot to do list:
- buying WTC (and insure against terrorist acts for nice profit)
- killing Atta and friends in Hamburg and taking passports and dumping bodies
- laying trail at flight schools
- buying large amounts of thermite and detonators and prepare at safe location
- get hold of passenger list and collect sound samples using Amdocs
- largest chunk: drive into WTC complex with vans and mount prepared charges in a weekend
- make 10-20 or so phone calls to relatives using samples for voice morphing + caller-ID spoofing
- push the buttons in WTC-7 after impact of planes
9/11, that's it.
ly in Bagdad? Does it not have 8 or so military bases in Iraq
Not at all! There was hardly any resistence against the invasion; maybe some libertarians uttered a protest, but that was the minority.
Really?
A small group you say? How small? Care to give a figure on the amount of people that would have to be involved in the planning, executing and covering up mass murder as laid out in your summarisation?
10? 20? 100? 200? Any idea?
This is all well and good, but your problem here is you're spouting things that quite simply are not true. You clearly haven't made any attempt to independently verify Bollyn's claims otherwise you would know they are false. In contrast, you presumably have known since childhood that 2X2=4, thus when Hitler affirms this fact to you, it is something you are already aware of, and there is no need to verify Hitler's claim.
Let's focus on a simple basic point which you've claimed repeatedly.
Security at the airports. You seem to be claiming that Huntleigh USA held the security contract at Logan International Airport, Washington Dulles International Airport and Newark International Airport in September 11, 2001. However, as you mention going through check in, I'll have to assume you also mean they had the contract for security for United Airlines and American Airlines at these airports. What you seem to have missed is that Airlines provided their own security.
Now, this claim is rather startling, but sadly it isn't true. If you do a bit of digging, as I did, you'll soon discover that Huntleigh only had one contract of interest - baggage handling for United Airlines. They didn't have any relevant security contracts with any of the airports or either of the airlines. In fact, if you had bothered to pay attention to your own conspiracy theorist friends you'd know that a company called Securacom had the security contract for Washington Dulles International Airport that morning.
Of course, if you'd bothered to do any research you'd know this already, so clearly you haven't. That means you took Bollyn's word for it. So I'll ask again. Why are you so eager to believe whatever that man claims?
No they didn't, but let's see what else you have.
Silverstein didn't buy the WTC, and it was highly profitable, and at nearly full capacity. Silverstein tried to have it insured for a ridiculously low amount and was forced to increase it (though still well under replacement value).
You forgot to mention that the Israeli stand-ins looked exactly like them. In fact, they looked so much like them that when Al-Shehhi's Israeli double travelled to Morocco in early 2001 to visit his family, they were completely fooled, as were the Al Qaeda operators of a safe house in Spain.
Of course then there's Jarrah, who, unlike the other hijackers, did not break off relations at all, and during his training he repeatedly visited his family and his German-Turkish girlfriend. All of them were, of course, totally fooled by the amazing Mossad double.
It's a pity this complex-wide shut down never occurred. But hey, minor detail.
Why?
We've covered the whole airport security thing, but that last point is interesting. The flight manifest records who actually physically enters the aircraft. I must presume, therefore, that you're claiming American Airlines and United Airlines are in on this plot to destroy four of their aircraft and murder a large number of their own employees (not to mention cause devastating damage to the airline industry) for the sake of Israel's peace of mind.
Ah, those pesky phone calls. They really are a thorn in the Conspiracy Theorist's side aren't they? It's a shame someone forgot to disable the pilots' radios because Air Traffic Control heard one of the hijackings take place.
Ah yes, because every single passenger on these aircraft booked their flight so far in advance the ninjas could actually gather enough detailed personal information about them to fool their relatives. Do you have any idea how utterly pathetically stupid the above is?
This should be good.
Well they forgot to buy it, and they badly under insured it, so not off to a good start. 0/2
Except those pesky patsies somehow came back to life and visited their friends and loved ones repeatedly. Should have seen that one coming. 0/3
2000lb of thermite - $4.2 million
10,000m of detonating wire - $45,000
2,000 ignition charges - $23,000
Realising thermite can't be used for building demolition - priceless
0/4
Curse those last minute cancellations and bookings.
0/5
Oops, forgot about the PAPD and their bomb sniffer dogs. 0/6
You think in the planning stage someone would have suggested the phone calls were a bad idea. 0/7
The severe fire damage, structural damage, and FDNY professional assessment of the building's condition was of course sheer coincidence. 0/8
Worse conspiracy ever. Ever.
It is the stupidest thing a homo sapiens sapiens has ever suggested.
Except Dekker didn't say he wasn't able to respond, just that he didn't respond.- Atta not being able to respond in German to flight school instructor Rudi Deckers; the real Atta is fluent in German.
- the behaviour of Atta in the US being unlike a devout muslim who is about te sacrifice his life for Islam: drinking, boorish behaviour, visiting strip joints.
Keller also states that Atta always spoke German with Wolfgang, directly contradicting the testimony of Rudi Dekkers, who told a Congressional Committee that when he addressed him in German, Atta had merely looked at him strangely.
http://www.madcowprod.com/issue40.html
A small group you say? How small? Care to give a figure on the amount of people that would have to be involved in the planning, executing and covering up mass murder as laid out in your summarisation?
10? 20? 100? 200? Any idea?
It is said in my blog; on the risk that the administrator is going to dump me for 'spamming' by quoting from my blog, since you ask for it politely I am giving you an answer anyway:
<snip>
P.S. Not that I plan to go anywhere, but just in case the administrator is going to dump me for 'spamming' I say goodbye to the regular members and say thanks for your time and comments. I have saved them all locally and will give them closer attention later. Just in case.
BTW: this thread will certainly not go down the memory hole but will probably later be part of my blog in case this thread will vanish from this forum.
the dubiousness of forbe's story aside, even he only claims half of one tower was powered down, not the entire complex as you claimRefers to power down.
The link in my blog is dead. Try: google '9/11 wtc power cuts' --> more than 100.000 hits.
www investigate911 com/911facts.htm
(had to enter spaces).
FACT: In the weekends prior to 9/11, the Twin Towers were shut down, evacuated and the power cut completely off. Employees complained such has never happened in their twenty years of working in the Twin Towers. Employees witnessed numerous foreign-looking workers carrying heavy bags of equipment into the Twin Towers;
www willthomasonline net/willthomasonline/The_WTC.html
POWER DOWN
Scott Forbes is taking the day off. The senior database administrator has worked all weekend and into Monday morning to shepherd every Fiduciary Trust's computer system safely back online after the WTC's first “power-down” saw the New York Port Authority cut electricity to the South Tower from the 48th floor up. The reason given was to install a fiber optic upgrade to increase the Trade Center's computer bandwidth.
But why only to the upper floors? Forbes wonders. And why power down the upper floors when the announced upgrade involves fiber optic cables that conduct light, not electricity?
As one of the Trade Center's first occupants, Fiduciary Trust spent a great deal of time and money powering down their computer systems prior to the power cut, which began early Saturday, September 8th and continued until mid-afternoon the following day. Computer consultants and their own staffs are still at work this morning in the Fiduciary offices on the 90th and 94th through 97th floors in the South Tower.
For nearly 30-hours, the WTC's upper floor elevators and security systems have been rendered inoperative. Though power remained to the lower floors, Forbes has seen many unfamiliar faces roaming freely through the upper corridors. In an email to journalist John Kaminski, author of The Day America Died and America's Autopsy Report, Forbes wrote, “Without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors, and many, many 'engineers' coming in and out of the tower.”
well why dont you start by finding out how many would be needed to bring down the towers, from there you can figure out the sizes needed to cut the collumns, how much time this would have taken to move into the complex and how long to set it upHow many ....? Do not know, I was not there; neither were you to disprove it.
the cut still has to move horizontally through the steel, something no one has been able to do with thermite (and dont bother linking to the youtube video of the rebar being cut, a point-spray device that can cut 1in rebar would not work for a 3in thick box column)Why this horizontal cut thing? I thought the idea was to cut under an angle to make the building 'walk'/implode?
But no Russian equivalents for Silverstein, Atzmon, Kroll associates, Urban Moving Systems, Clean Break, PNAC I presume.
It is said in my blog; on the risk that the administrator is going to dump me for 'spamming' by quoting from my blog, since you ask for it politely I am giving you an answer anyway:
Who were the plotters?
In this interview of Alex Jones with Andreas von Bulow, the former German Defense Minister said that 9/11 had to be carried out by a very small group of people. Alex asked him 100? 40? He said less than that.
let's start counting:
Highest level:
Mastermind: Zakheim (remote control idea & link between israeli and US-politics)
Israeli government: Olmert & Netanjahu (commanding Mossad).
US government: Cheney; dominates US-government including Bush. Cheney's role is to convert the 9/11 event into making sure the US invades Iraq & Afghanistan.
Operative level:
- Silverstein: buying WTC & hiring Israeli security firm Kroll.
- Jules & Jeremy Kroll: security firm WTC, make sure Israeli demolition team has access to WTC and can work undisturbed.
- Giuliani: WTC7 command & control center; handles aftermath 'on the ground' in NY.
lower echelon:
- Goff & Yoran: link between access to production software on sensitive US institutions like NORAD; they enable Israeli software programmers to manipulates NORAD software and proably 'home run' remote control system.
- Atzmon: asked by Olmert to handle 9/11 at departure airports.
- Hauer: works for Kroll and 'does the media' on 9/11.
These are only 12 people, not counting Mossad agents, who do not need to know the big picture... just change software and plant demolitions charges , kill a few Arabs, take some flying courses and make some fake phone calls on 9/11.
That is, the plot consists of 12 core people plus 20-40 foot soldiers.
P.S. Not that I plan to go anywhere, but just in case the administrator is going to dump me for 'spamming' I say goodbye to the regular members and say thanks for your time and comments. I have saved them all locally and will give them closer attention later. Just in case.
BTW: this thread will certainly not go down the memory hole but will probably later be part of my blog in case this thread will vanish from this forum.
wrong, you collect evidence first and build a narrative around what the evidence indicatesBefore you can acquire evidence you need first a narative to find evidence for.
9/11 investigator
Do you have anything besides far stretched speculation and politically based conjecture? You know, something legitimate that you didn't simply make up because you despite people from certain countries or administrations?
wrong, you collect evidence first and build a narrative around what the evidence indicates
what you suggest is affirming the consequent, a logical fallacy