• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Colin Powell to endorse Obama on Meet the Press?

XenonII said:
Waiting for the mainstream media to label him a racist like they would if he was a white Democrat jumping ship to vote for McCain. Waiting...but not holding my breath (don't want to commit suicide!) :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Yes, I think it is just criminal what the MSM did to Joe Lieberman for endorsing McCain. At the Republican convention, no less. All those charges of racism. References to Jewish slave traders. Lynchings. KKK.

Oh, I forgot. That didn't happen.

Never mind. :o
 
Powell is showing his true colors (no pun intended). If only whites were as loyal to their race as blacks are (and are allowed to be) to theirs. McCain would win with a landslide. Whites have lost their racial consciousness.
 
Last edited:
gdnp said:
Yes, I think it is just criminal what the MSM did to Joe Lieberman for endorsing McCain. At the Republican convention, no less. All those charges of racism. References to Jewish slave traders. Lynchings. KKK.

Oh, I forgot. That didn't happen.

Never mind. :o
Click to expand...

Lieberman is an (left-leaning) independent. McCain is a RINO, so it's not really all that surprising Lieberman would endorse him. Powell, is also a RINO (or was) but decides to back the far left Obama anyway. Evidently Powell, like the vast majority of Blacks, is too far to the left for the Republican party. No great surprise there either. And lastly... Jews aren't white! (I was talking about the racial double standard the media exhibits between Blacks and Whites). White - technically Caucasian - is a race, not a skin color!
 
Last edited:
Hokulele said:
In which case it is just as loyal for whites to vote for Obama as it is for blacks.

Just as it is just as loyal for people of Thai ancestry to cheer for Tiger Woods.
Click to expand...

No whites have Obama's "exotic" (for want of a better word) racial makeup. I believe there is no such thing as being half black and half white, there is a name of course for this uncovential racial mix - Mulatto. Obama has a race and that race is black, just he is not pure race like most people (and by pure race I don't necessarily mean 100% pure just close enough to 100% before anyone alleges no one is pure race, most Europeans are 97-98%+ pure race for example which sets the standard.)

White genes are believed to be recessive and black genes believed to be dominant. Therefore when a white woman mates with a Negro, such as in the case of Obama's mother, we can see the result in the offspring is an individual that looks far more black than they do white.

Tiger Woods is also black, one of these rarer Mongoloid-Negroid types compared to Obama a Caucasoid-Negroid. These people are technically hybrids, but because of the dominance of black genes, this is the race we classify them under. Otherwise, you would have people without a race. Tiger Woods is not of Thai ancestory, his mother is.
 
Last edited:
Tricky said:
LOL! Oh golly! This is sig material! Are you telling us that Tiger Woods is not descended from his mother??!! You are a pip, you are!
Click to expand...

What I ment of course is that he is not of Thai ancestery exclusively, he is of mixed racial ancestery which is Thai in part. The point is there are a thousand and one reasons why Whites shouldn't vote for Obama, regardless of the race of the man. But if Blacks voting for Obama because he is black is a perfectly legitimate reason and is not racist, then the same applies for Whites voting for McCain because he is White.

The hypocritical MSM has no problem with Blacks using racial considerations in deciding for who to vote, and so has no business in getting all twisted out of shape and savaging Whites for allegedly doing the same. They should shut up, they must be feeling desperate that their candidate is gonna lose if the AP's attack dogs are being released on their fellow liberals who just so happen to be white.
 
Last edited:
XenonII said:
No whites have Obama's "exotic" (for want of a better word) racial makeup. I believe there is no such thing as being half black and half white, there is a name of course for this uncovential racial mix - Mulatto. Obama has a race and that race is black, just he is not pure race like most people (and by pure race I don't necessarily mean 100% pure just close enough to 100% before anyone alleges no one is pure race, most Europeans are 97-98%+ pure race for example which sets the standard.) White genes are believed to be recessive and black genes believed to be dominant. Therefore when a white woman mates with a Negro, such as in the case of Obama's mother, we can see the result in the offspring is an individual that looks far more black than they do white. Tiger Woods is also black, one of these rarer Mongoloid-Negroid types compared to Obama a Caucasoid-Negroid. These people are technically hybrids, but because of the dominance of black genes, this is the race we classify them under. Otherwise, you would have people without a race.
Click to expand...
Suddenly it is all clear. We must keep the black men away from the white women, lest our inferior white genes are overpowered by the dominant black ones.

Tiger Woods is not of Thai ancestory, his mother is.
Click to expand...

I guess race is carried on the Y chromosome. How did I miss this in genetics class?
 
XenonII said:
No whites have Obama's "exotic" (for want of a better word) racial makeup. I believe there is no such thing as being half black and half white, there is a name of course for this uncovential racial mix - Mulatto. Obama has a race and that race is black, just he is not pure race like most people (and by pure race I don't necessarily mean 100% pure just close enough to 100% before anyone alleges no one is pure race, most Europeans are 97-98%+ pure race for example which sets the standard.)
Click to expand...
{snipped} Really poor form on my part. Sorry.
 
Last edited:
XenonII said:
What I ment of course is that he is not of Thai ancestery exclusively, he is of mixed racial ancestery which is Thai in part. The point is there are a thousand and one reasons why Whites shouldn't vote for Obama, regardless of the race of the man. But if Blacks voting for Obama because he is black is a perfectly legitimate reason and is not racist, then the same applies for Whites voting for McCain because he is White.
Click to expand...

But a black voting for Obama because his is black is not a perfectly legitimate reason, it is racist. A black voting for Obama because they believe that he is the candidate that best reflects their values and who they feel would best lead the country is a legitimate reason. How many of the 90-95% of blacks expected to vote for him will do so for racist reasons, how many for legitimate reasons, and how many for a combination of the two is unknown.

Is your premise that I as a white person should vote for McCain/Palin over Obama/Biden even though Obama better reflects my values? That if some people vote based on stupid racist reasons that I should vote against my own perceived interests to balance the equation?
 
Last edited:
XenonII said:
What I ment of course is that he is not of Thai ancestery exclusively, he is of mixed racial ancestery which is Thai in part. The point is there are a thousand and one reasons why Whites shouldn't vote for Obama, regardless of the race of the man. But if Blacks voting for Obama because he is black is a perfectly legitimate reason and is not racist, then the same applies for Whites voting for McCain because he is White.
Click to expand...
It is not as if Blacks voting for Democrats is a brand new thing. Most Democrats, since Lyndon Johnson, have carried a strong, even overwhelming majority of Black votes.

People vote for the person that they think will make their own situation better. The Republican party has done little if anything to indicate that they have any concern for the plight of Black Americans. So to imagine that Black Americans think that Obama will be more likely than even other Democrats to make their situation better, is hardly a startling proposal.

By contrast, Whites, have no indication that voting for McCain will make their situation better. Indeed, many think just the opposite. So you see, that while politics may follow some racial alignments, in the end it is just politics. Sure, there are a number of Black people who will vote for Obama even though they might disagree with his politics. There are certainly as many White people who will vote against him for purely racist reasons, and since Whites outnumber Blacks, likely they will have the advantage of the purely racist vote.

But if you are assuming that all of the Blacks who are voting for Obama are doing so because he is black, then you are yourself making a racist assumption that is not based on politics. If you are saying "it's okay to be racist because they're even more racist", then you are one of the reasons why racism is still so prevalent. Until you are able to say, "I don't care what they do, I will vote on the issues," then you will never be free of your chains.
 
Last edited:
Xenon, are you being serious?

If so then you should understand that anthropologists are moving away from the notion that there are different races of people. Our differences are superficial. Race is largely a social construct not a biological one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom