• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Kevin Barrett could break Libertarian records

WildCat said:
A big clue is "a judge found Kevin Barrett innocent". Judges don't find people innocent, it's either guilty or not guilty.
Click to expand...

Under that logic, nobody is innocent. That's what a police state is. Under your logic, you are not innocent of hitting Barrett's children.
 
Highly Selassie said:
Galileo, if what you are claiming is correct, then the author of that article could be charged with libel. That is a serious accusation. Have legal proceedings been initiated in this matter?
Click to expand...

I know the author of the article, and no, I'm not interested in accusing my friend of libel. You are the one making the libel accusation.

Libel must be intentional and my friend made a mistake, did nothing intentional and there is no libel.
 
Galileo said:
You are spreading false information. Dr. Barrett taught at UW-Madison for 13 years. When he came under fire by the neo-cns, he was defending by the school administration. He was not "essentially fired", nor was he fired.

Dr. Barrett is pro-Semite. He converted to a Semitic religion and speaks Semitic languages.

Why don't you start a thread comparing Galileo and Dr. Barrett. According to your logic, Galileo was "essentially fired" from the University of Pisa in 1592 for teaching crazy theories about the earth's motion.
Click to expand...

He did not teach for 13 years. He was a Teaching Assistant, a position that students take, usually during their post-graduate studies, that basically amounts to Professor's Lackey. A TA is not a professor and has pretty much zero control over the content of the class. He was initially defended by the school administration, then they quickly distanced themselves. Also, the comparison is Galileo is absolutely laughable.

As for the "He converted to a Semitic religion and speaks Semitic languages.", you and everyone else knows well that "anti-semitic" means "anti-jew", and your bizarre nonsensical defenses do nothing to change that.


ETA: I should also note that the school only allowed him to continue teaching if he assured them that 9/11 conspiracy theories would not be part of the course, which he had initially intended. He agreed, and presented 9/11 CTs anyway.
 
Last edited:
Ok, nevermind. We are dealing with an irrational mind and this thread is done.
 
Galileo said:
Under that logic, nobody is innocent. That's what a police state is. Under your logic, you are not innocent of hitting Barrett's children.
Click to expand...

No, its just a concession to one of the basic laws of logic, i.e. that you can't prove a negative.
 
TexasJack said:
Go look up Sauk County court records, he is being charged with disorderly conduct, case is listed as open, plus charges are being filed for bail jumping. You shouldn't rely on on your biased sources.
Click to expand...

You said Barrett hit his kid. He didn't, that has already been determined by the judge. You're talking about a different case. Disorderly conduct is a petty offense.

People worried about mass murder by the Bush regime are not concerned with petty offenses.
 
BARABOO, Wis. (AP) - A judge has dismissed a temporary restraining order that kept Libertarian congressional candidate Kevin Barrett from having contact with his two sons.
But Sauk County Circuit Judge Guy Reynolds upheld a petition barring Barrett from contact with his wife.
Both sides agreed to drop a child abuse injunction against Barrett on behalf of the boys. His wife had claimed he hit his 13-year-old son the morning of the Sept. 9 primary election.
Barrett is due in court Oct. 16 on a disorderly conduct charge.
Click to expand...
http://www.wkowtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=9037222

Hardly cleared.
 
Galileo said:
You said Barrett hit his kid. He didn't, that has already been determined by the judge.
Click to expand...
The judge determined no such thing. His ex-wife dropped the charges "on behalf of the boys".
 
tomwaits said:
He did not teach for 13 years. He was a Teaching Assistant, a position that students take, usually during their post-graduate studies, that basically amounts to Professor's Lackey. A TA is not a professor and has pretty much zero control over the content of the class. He was initially defended by the school administration, then they quickly distanced themselves. Also, the comparison is Galileo is absolutely laughable.

As for the "He converted to a Semitic religion and speaks Semitic languages.", you and everyone else knows well that "anti-semitic" means "anti-jew", and your bizarre nonsensical defenses do nothing to change that.


ETA: I should also note that the school only allowed him to continue teaching if he assured them that 9/11 conspiracy theories would not be part of the course, which he had initially intended. He agreed, and presented 9/11 CTs anyway.
Click to expand...

your use of the term "anti-Semitic" is offensive and racist, and is anti-Muslim and anti-Arab. Most Semites are Arabs.

I would hope that you could refrain from that sort of offensive language here.

Dr. Barrett is the second coming of Galileo! Both are freedom fighters and defenders of TRUTH!!

If you opposes Barrett, that makes you anti-freedom, anti-truth, and anti-Galileo.

Galileo and Barrett both got arrested by a police state.
 
thum_2141248f4f575611ca.jpg
 
WildCat said:
The judge determined no such thing. His ex-wife dropped the charges "on behalf of the boys".
Click to expand...

You're wrong. The temporary restraining order said the boys were in imminent danger because Barrett allegedly hit them. They judge found that Barrett did not hit anyone, so the TRO was dropped. If Barrett had really hit anyone, then it would be on the behalf of the boys to keep the TRO in place.
 
Galileo said:
You're wrong. The temporary restraining order said the boys were in imminent danger because Barrett allegedly hit them. They judge found that Barrett did not hit anyone, so the TRO was dropped. If Barrett had really hit anyone, then it would be on the behalf of the boys to keep the TRO in place.
Click to expand...

Show us where the Judge said this, and from a reliable source, not your bogus Libertarian sites.
 
TexasJack said:
Show us where the Judge said this, and from a reliable source, not your bogus Libertarian sites.
Click to expand...

IPR is not a Libertarian site, you are making more false claims. YOU have hurled accusations, so you need to prove your claims.

You should also learn about the principle of being innocent until proven guilty. Barrett is innocent.
 
Galileo said:
You're wrong. The temporary restraining order said the boys were in imminent danger because Barrett allegedly hit them. They judge found that Barrett did not hit anyone, so the TRO was dropped. If Barrett had really hit anyone, then it would be on the behalf of the boys to keep the TRO in place.
Click to expand...
You are lying, this charge was dropped by the wife.

Why do "truthers" lie so much?
 
tomwaits said:
Sorry, I'm at work and can't watch it. Can you describe the vid?
Click to expand...
Kevin Barrett goes to Rep. Kind's office to deliver a pink slip to him. Barrett, of course, is wearing a "V For Vendetta" mask... :boggled:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom