Screw Loose Change has numerous posts about 9/11 and Holocaust deniers, including an account of the Phoenix 9/11 Truth conference in Feb., 2007, which was organized by a Holocaust denier. Here's SLC's search results for "Holocaust" http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/search?q=Holocaust
AAAAHHHH! HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!Yeah right Mark. BTW I thought you were retired from here? So I guess you’ve finally taken your thumb out of your mouth and have stretch out of that fetal position Gage beat you into and are now just getting some of your confidence back. Good for you tough guy.
Nice of you to purposly ignore the fact that Gravy said that SOME prominant truthers were anti-semetic. He never said that all truthers were anti-semeticThat's some nice generizations you made there. Lumping everyone together who might have some similar thoughts on one issue. Do you generalize much? I mean being on the subject of anti-Semitism and all I was just curious.
I’m going to take a break from Loose Change’s narrative for a moment, to talk about 9/11 denial and anti-Semitism.
I'm not sorry at all, Merc. The truther posts here exactly illustrate the points we were making.HomIns....
Pathetic.
Gravy...
Sorry our interview led to this. You were quite right.
AAAAHHHH! HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
Nice of you to purposly ignore the fact that Gravy said that SOME prominant truthers were anti-semetic. He never said that all truthers were anti-semetic
It is you who commits a logical fallacy. My comment was about prominent truth leaders who were/are Holocaust deniers. If I got something wrong, let me know.You've obviously spent a lot of time investigating select 9/11 truthers in support of your guilt-by-association fallacy. What conclusions have you come to? Can you estimate how many of us truthers are really jew-hating bigots? Please break it down by the numbers for us.
Your fallacy again. You miss the fact that I examined those AFP claims in my Loose Change Guide, and showed them to be false.In any event, just focusing on a few bad-apples serves your purpose, doesn't it? Because you know full well that if you just point out that sources like AFP are run by bigots, that even if what they have to say about 9/11 is true, most people won't be aware that you're committing a fallacy.
As always, you're welcome to shoot me an email detailing anything you think I've gotten wrong. Until then, I suggest conserving your energy. Your brain may be in need of the oxygen.Then you can avoid dealing with the facts that have caused so many people to question what exactly happened. If you really push this hard enough, you might be able to-preempt all questions about 9/11 altogether! After all, if everyone knows that the 9/11 truth movement is really just a smokescreen for hating jewish people, that will serve as a deterrent enough, won't it.
Mark Roberts starts off by stating that the 9/11 Truth Movement was largely started by Holocaust denier's and anti-Semites.
How sad. I just received an email from William Rodriguez. He wrote an email to “one of the most influential American anti-Semitic propagandists of the past 50 years.” (see above) and to anti-Semite Michael Collins Piper to advise them that "Mark Roberts of Brooklyn, NY" "attacked" the American Free Press on this website. He linked to this thread.
Could you answer those questions, Tippit?
Does Gravy know your movement better than you do?
My apologies, then.Well, your premise is wrong. I don't have a movement. I haven't attended any rallies, I don't own any investigate 9/11 t-shirts, I don't attend workgroups, or meet-ups. The questions were rhetorical in the sense that I really don't care what the answers are anyway. That there are bigots who think we were lied to about 9/11 is inconsequential. That rubes like Roberts are using smear-tactics to discredit a broad-based and diverse movement of people is irrelevant. He has failed to convince us with his version of the facts, and this is what he's left with.
The truth movement could be filled with axe-murderers and it wouldn't change what I think about 9/11, and it wouldn't change what happened.
It was.
Chris Bollyn, Eric Humsfield, Carol Valentine, American Free Press...
You name a popular 9/11 denier theory and we can probably trace it back to it's anti-semite roots. If you honestly think anti-semites don't influence the movement, just look at the theories around WTC7: Many other buildings collapse, but let's focus on the one owned by a jew.
Aw come on. You really know who I was laughing at. Then again maybe not.Yeah I thought it was funny too. Though you better not let your hero hear you laughing at him. He seems to hold grudges.
I think that he was alluding that you all (truthers) were being lead around by your nose by anti-semites. They will then use your numbers to bolster their agenda.He did? Then he doesn't have much of an argument does he? Very observant of you! Have a cookie.
Aw come on. You really know who I was laughing at. Then again maybe not.
I think that he was alluding that you all (truthers) were being lead around by your nose by anti-semites. They will then use your numbers to bolster their agenda.
And the official version was started by...
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, 9/11 Commission Report (an obstructed investigation btw)...