• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lets see if i got Sunder right on WTC7

Somebody pointed out 2 testimonies, there are 116 others, including some later not related reports where guys were told to shut up or your retirement and other benefits could be at risk.
Click to expand...

So the unions were in on it also?
 
For those who didn't get a chance to see it live, the presentation is still available to stream using RealPlayer from the following URL:

rtsp: //a366.v231478.c23147.g.vr.akamaistream.net:554/ondemand/7/366/23147/v0001/w.on24.com/media/news/corporatevideo/events/11/73/59/rt/1_rmmulti.rm (remove the space after rtsp)

Open up RealPlayer, head to File -> Open Location and paste the URL in (minus the space). In some cases entering the URL into your web browser address bar and hitting return should open the stream up in RealPlayer :)
 
16.5 said:
Hey Truther, in your grossly misguided attempt to be a smart ass, let me remind you of one thing:

The Fire department of New York lost 343 Men that day. Those "fire trucks and hydrants" you so frivolously discuss did not have the manpower to operate.

You call the loss of contents and records a shame??

Pathetic, Truther.

FAIL
Click to expand...

you're wrong, no one died in WTC 7. You fail to get the sympathy vote.
 
Dave Rogers said:
It's been well-known for a long time that the water main to lower Manhattan was ruptured by the collapse of WTC1, and that the firefighters at WTC7 couldn't raise enough pressure to get a jet of water across the road, let alone any reasonable way up a 47 storey tower. Perhaps you'd like to check this with research of your own.

Dave
Click to expand...

what the water line ruptured by thermite or the office fire?
 
Galileo said:
you're wrong, no one died in WTC 7. You fail to get the sympathy vote.
Click to expand...
Wrong truther, you missed the point and messed up again. You failed to present evidence on topic; a double failure.
 
Last edited:
Galileo said:
it that what took out the fire alarms at 6:47 AM as well?
Click to expand...
Nope. Do you want to explain why the alarms you claim "were taken out" went off any way(your not worth looking up the time, I think it was 9:59 am though)

ATA: only the local alarm was set to test NOT the reporting to central stations.
 
Last edited:
Galileo said:
what's your evidence?
Click to expand...

Perhaps you should read the NIST report on WTC7; you know, the subject upon which this thread is based? Had you done that you would not be resorting to the "truther" reset with the above request.

And just as a side note, it is exactly this type of argumentative posturing that keeps your fringe theories on the fringe. As opposed to actually taking steps and supplying an attorney with the alleged irrefutable evidence the TM boasts, you resort to pissing contests online. How much more banal and benign can your efforts possibly be?

ETA: I am still in the process of reading the report, so I am not trying to boast some sort of superior understanding. But I am, at the very least, reading it.
 
If I can get past the poor grammar and punctuation, I have to give roundhead credit. He's going up against a barrage of logical fallacies, played out web references, and of course the obligatory joo reference.

All of which attempts to avoid the rather important points he has managed to get out.
 
Dave Rogers said:
Since it was in the undamaged bathtub, it can only have been ruptured by energy beams from space. As we all know, water mains are designed to survive having 110-storey buildings collapse on top of them.

Dave
Click to expand...

there were no energy beams from space. You are a good example of why I ignore the conspiracy nuts.
 
RedIbis said:
If I can get past the poor grammar and punctuation, I have to give roundhead credit. He's going up against a barrage of logical fallacies, played out web references, and of course the obligatory joo reference.
Click to expand...

And like you, roundhead in a rather intellectually dishonest fashion implies guilt on the part of the FDNY and runs away like a coward when cornered. No one wonder you're so complimentary of him. It makes you feel better about yourself.
 
johnny karate said:
And like you, roundhead in a rather intellectually dishonest fashion implies guilt on the part of the FDNY and runs away like a coward when cornered. No one wonder you're so complimentary of him. It makes you feel better about yourself.
Click to expand...

I've read enough of your posts to know you can't back up any of your ridiculous charges.

Focus on the WTC 7 NIST report.
 
RedIbis said:
All of which attempts to avoid the rather important points he has managed to get out.
Click to expand...

As I also find roundhead's child-like use of grammar and syntax irritating, and thus skim over most of his posts, please outline in concise detail the "rather important points" he has made. I must have missed them.
 
Galileo said:
I believe that anthrax took down WTC 7. Weaponized anthrax.
Click to expand...

Don't be silly! It was a bird. A bird with red feet.
Hmm.

avatar18366_1.gif


:eusa_think:
 
leftysergeant said:
BS. A soldier is subject to court-martial if he refuses to follow an order. Nothing in the world prevents a fire fighter from dropping a dime on an officer who gives a clearly criminal order or seriously screws up and gets people hurt. Concealling classified information is not in the contract they signed. Give it up. That arguement goes nowhere. (Just my professional opinion as both a fire fighter and a retired soldier.)
Click to expand...

And since when the heck do soldiers have Unions?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom