• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Anthrax Case Solved?

boloboffin said:
The envelopes used in the mailings were evidently purchased at a postal center blocks from Fort Detrick and also Ivins' home.
Click to expand...

The pre stamped envelopes used in the anthrax attacks were a standard item available at post offices and automated postal centers all across the country. How would they know that these specific envelopes were sold at one specific postal center?
 
Look even at this stage, the MSM are trying to draw back, calling it a cock-up rather than a cover-up. Read the comments everywhere, (except here - which are very few and I do wonder why) - no one believes this ridiculous story.
 
Oxigen said:
Look even at this stage, the MSM are trying to draw back, calling it a cock-up rather than a cover-up. Read the comments everywhere, (except here - which are very few and I do wonder why) - no one believes this ridiculous story.
Click to expand...

So the media isn't part of the conspiracy anymore? It got fired or something?
 
Oxigen said:
Look even at this stage, the MSM are trying to draw back, calling it a cock-up rather than a cover-up. Read the comments everywhere, (except here - which are very few and I do wonder why) - no one believes this ridiculous story.
Click to expand...

Yes I’ve been wondering the same thing. Where are all the anti-conspiracy idiots on this story? I posted early in this thread and got nothing. I think this whole story embarrasses them and the commitment they have painted themselves into a corner on regarding this administration and all of the apologizing they have done for it surrounding 9/11 over the last few years.

They don’t want any part of it. It flies in the face of everything they have been supporting about 9/11, the governments investigations, and it's conclusions.
 
Profanz said:
Yes I’ve been wondering the same thing. Where are all the anti-conspiracy idiots on this story? I posted early in this thread and got nothing. I think this whole story embarrasses them and the commitment they have painted themselves into a corner on regarding this administration and all of the apologizing they have done for it surrounding 9/11 over the last few years.

They don’t want any part of it. It flies in the face of everything they have been supporting about 9/11, the governments investigations, and it's (sic) conclusions.
Click to expand...

You seem to know a heck of a lot more than the FBI itself, if you want to share anything that might shed some light, please do.
 
Pardalis said:
You seem to know a heck of a lot more than the FBI itself, if you want to share anything that might shed some light, please do.
Click to expand...

I think it’s pretty obvious that if Hatfield had succumbed to the pressure in the same manner as this latest suspect did the case would have been solved all that much sooner for all of you so-called critical thinking skeptics. You all fail big time and this story shows it. It’s just that some of you are smart enough not to go near it and some of you aren’t.
 
Profanz said:
I think it’s pretty obvious that if Hatfield had succumbed to the pressure in the same manner as this latest suspect did the case would have been solved all that much sooner for all of you so-called critical thinking skeptics. You all fail big time and this story shows it. It’s just that some of you are smart enough not to go near it and some of you aren’t.
Click to expand...

So I take it you don't have any evidence to share?
 
Pardalis said:
So I take it you don't have any evidence to share?
Click to expand...

Oh you do huh? And what's your position on the FBI and their failure to produce anything that links this guy to the Anthrax attack anymore then Hatfield was linked to it. I guess you just relate with the FBI. They have nothing and neither do you. Just keep up with your blind faith. You take it huh? Yeah you take the government and whatever they feed you right up the... does it hurt?
 
Profanz said:
Oh you do huh?
Click to expand...

That's my point, I don't, and I don't pretend to.

And what's your position on the FBI and their failure to produce anything that links this guy to the Anthrax attack anymore then Hatfield was linked to it. I guess you just relate with the FBI. They have nothing and neither do you. Just keep up with your blind faith. You take it huh? Yeah you take the government ans whatever they feed you right up the... does it hurt?
Click to expand...
My position on this is that I don't know who did it, and I prefer to leave the investigation to the professionals. I trust the process will eventually lead to the truth, and will not accuse anyone or anything before evidence is found.

You on the other hand seem to be the one to accuse alot of people without an iota of clue.
 
Last edited:
Pardalis said:
That's my point, I don't, and I don't pretend to.

My position on this is that I don't know who did it, and I prefer to let the investigation to the professionals. I trust the process will eventually lead to the truth, and will not accuse anyone or anything before evidence is found.
Click to expand...

It has been left to the so-called professionals for seven years now and seven years later you "don't know who did it" but you "trust the process will eventually lead to the truth, and will not accuse anyone or anything before evidence is found".

What the hell are you talking about? They haven't already accused someone and waited until he was dead to publicly do so and will now probably be bringing the investigation to a close? After they already falsely accused someone else and had to pay out a settlement to them?

Pardalis said:
You on the other hand seem to be the one to accuse alot of people without an iota of clue.
Click to expand...

Yeah right. Me and the FBI.
 
Seems to me that the CTs are jumping to conclusions about skeptics jumping to conclusions while the skeptics are waiting for the evidence.
 
Profanz said:
It has been left to the so-called professionals for seven years now and seven years later you "don't know who did it" but you "trust the process will eventually lead to the truth, and will not accuse anyone or anything before evidence is found".
Click to expand...

It takes time, that's nothing unusual. I have no reason to distrust the process. At least it shows they are being thorough. If there was a conspiracy, wouldn't it all have been resolved already?

What the hell are you talking about? They haven't already accused someone and waited until he was dead to publicly do so and will now probably be bringing the investigation to a close? After they already falsely accused someone else and had to pay out a settlement to them?
Click to expand...
Speculation again. How do you know he's been falsely accused? Again, you imply to know more than most people, but you don't know anything more than anyone.
 
Last edited:
Pardalis said:
It takes time, that's nothing unusual. I have no reason to distrust the process. At least it shows they are being thorough. If there was a conspiracy, wouldn't it all have been resolved already?
Click to expand...

It takes time? You do realize they are expected to close the case don't you?

Pardalis said:
Speculation again. How do you know he's been falsely accused? Again, you imply to know more than most people, but you don't know anything more than anyone.
Click to expand...

Speculation? The one they falsely accused is Steven Hatfield who worked at the same location where the FBI has claimed the new DNA evidence came from. How do I know he was falsely accused? Just a hunch from the 5.8 million they paid him for falsely accusing him.

Are you done yet not being smart enough as your so-called skeptic friends who aren't weighing in on this thread?
 
Profanz said:
It takes time? You do realize they are expected to close the case don't you?
Click to expand...

Yes, let them do that, please.

Speculation? The one they falsely accused is Steven Hatfield who worked at the same location where the FBI has claimed the new DNA evidence came from. How do I know he was falsely accused? Just a hunch from the 5.8 million they paid him for falsely accusing him.
Click to expand...

I thought you were talking about this present suspect Ivins. But you've just shown an example of a case where the FBI has been proven wrong.

The system seems to work. They were mistaken, the victim was compensated. You see, no big conspiracy here.

Are you done yet not being smart enough as your so-called skeptic friends who aren't weighing in on this thread?
Click to expand...

Because people like you are already calling it a government conspiracy without any proof.
 
Pardalis said:
I thought you were talking about this present suspect Ivins. But you've just shown an example of a case where the FBI has been proven wrong.

The system seems to work. They were mistaken, the victim was compensated. You see, no big conspiracy here.
Click to expand...
I think you may be conceding too much here. The FBI clearly suspected Hatfill, but named him a "person of interest". I do not believe they ever indicted him or even officially called him a suspect. AFAIK the compensation is related to leaking information to the press, which Hatfill claims (rightly) damaged his reputation. So the worst you can accuse the FBI of here is following a false lead and leaking supposedly secret information.
 
I have noticed that the media seems to be noticing that the woman who put out the restraining order has an "interesting" background, did some of her stuff in odd order/time and is not exactly a psychiatrist or close too it and her statements contradict those of a number of people who knew him. Since I have met and talked with no one involved (and am not sure he was even at Detrick when I was - and my group was not playing with anthrax) I simply find that interesting and am waiting to see where it all goes! :)
 
gdnp said:
The FBI clearly suspected Hatfill, but named him a "person of interest". I do not believe they ever indicted him or even officially called him a suspect.
Click to expand...

You think any of us are fooled by lawyer-speak?
 
Pardalis said:
You can speculate all you want, the jury is still out on this one. Heck, the jury hasn't even been put together yet.
Click to expand...

There won't be any jury because there won't be any trial, genius. The suspect was suicided.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom