The north side evidence validated to the point of redundancy

[Sword_Of_Truth]

congrats sword of truth....

you now join beachnut and bobert

How can I know you aren't lying about this as well?

 

[TheRedWorm]

well plane debris with serial numbers that can be confirmed as being there through photographic evidence placing it at the scene at that time would be a start but again this thread has nothing to do with the pentagon.

In another thread you posted this. (My mistake for asking it there instead of here in the first place) Is it fair to say that this is your standard of evidence for every event? Or does this standard only apply to the flightpath and subsequent crash of flight 77 at the Pentagon?

bump

 

[robeeb]

Of the 100+ eyewitnesses who said they saw the plane hit the Pentagon, how many have you guys (cit) interviewed?

I've mentioned in another thread by TheLoneBedouin of an eyewitness I know personally who was in DC that day, and witnessed flight 77 impact the Pentagon. I guarantee you they have not interviewed this person. They don't even acknowledge my info, or even my presence here on the forum. I don't know if it's because they have me on ignore, or if they don't want to hear of a credible witness that does nothing to further their ridiculous "theories".

 

[robeeb]

1) it is easier to not crash into a building than to crash into it.

I'm curious about why you think this is true. Are you a pilot? Do you have any flight experience?

 

[funk de fino]

if money can't be tracked does that mean the tracker knows where it is?

Do you know where your money goes after you give it to the walmart checkout girl?

You know you spent it but you dont know where it goes do you?

If someone asks you where that $20 is you cannot tell them where it went after you gave it to the cashier. Dont know much about accounting do you?

 

[funk de fino]

Any answer to post # 169 and 215?

Do you just put everyone on ignore when they catch you out?

 

[Drudgewire]

Do you know where your money goes after you give it to the walmart checkout girl?

You know you spent it but you dont know where it goes do you?

He only loses track of that money if he loses his receipt. Otherwise he can keep tabs on it forever.

 

[bje]

I KNOW ITS HARD BUT CAN YOU GUYS PLEASE QUIT RECITING THAT LIE?

It's actually over 1,000 witnesses. This fact you and CIT know well.

You know that, TC3298, and have already stated that you refuse to interview them.

Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis are on record of refusing to interview over 1,000 KEY eyewitnesses.

Why do you persist on lying about the evidence, TC329? Do you think you are fooling anyone?

Tell us, right here on JREF, why you insist on lying about AA77, TC329.

 

[~enigma~]

I KNOW ITS HARD BUT CAN YOU GUYS PLEASE QUIT RECITING THAT LIE?

It isn't a lie...face it, CIT is ganz kaput.

 

[The Big Dog]

I AM TC I AM USING BIG WORDS

PAY ATTENTION TO ME.

Anyhow, Dom, Pickering got so disgusted with the frauds in the Truth Movement, he gave up. He was there with the CIT and was horrified at their incompetence and fraudulent tactics.

A great example is the cherry picking frauds at the CIT. Tell CIT to release their full unedited tapes of all their interviews. We know Aldo and Lyte flat out admitted that they misrepresented themselves to get the interviews. So Dom, this is just another reason why just about everybody thinks that the CIT is not just a joke, but flat out disinfo. I think they are just dumb.

I hope that does not stretch your "incredoolly"

I hope that Dom will not find CIT "uneffective."

Hee hee!

Anyhow, say hi to your pal Killtown for us, will ya?

 

[nicepants]

i gave you the link jason.

why are you being so intentionally dishonest?

i answered your question the first time you asked it in this thread.

You must have missed this part:

Express your answer in the form of a number,

According to your list..you've interviewed 17 out of the 104+ eyewitnesses. Do you really think that refusing to interview roughly 84% of the eyewitnesses is responsible?

this is how you conmen work. you ask a question. someone answers it. you ignore it. and then you ask another person the same question hoping they didn't see the first ones answer.

wow. you're a work of art.

Actually, I asked because I wasn't given a number, just another link to your drivel. But according to that list, the number is 17.

17 into 104 is about 16%

So you your entire theory is based on statements from only 1 out of every 6 people! ....and Craig calls that a "sizeable portion".....NOW who is being "intellectually dishonest"

 

[bobloblaw]

what witnesses are you rambling on about?

How about witness Sgt. Chadwick Brooks, who in 2001 states that he would never forget the image of seeing the plane hitting the light poles?

 

[TC329]

Do you really think that refusing to interview roughly 84% of the eyewitnesses is responsible?

again you are being purposely dishonest.

cit "refuses" to interview no one.

cit has contacted more witnesses as stated in the list and others as of yet haven't been located.

you're free to try and help find means of contacting the others and verifying their statements and thus for duh-bunking the the 13 NoC eyewitnesses and the flyover witness or you can just continue your little internet tirades and stomp your feet and pound your fists some more and call people names.

your choice.

i already know what you're going to pick though.

 

[TC329]

How about witness Sgt. Chadwick Brooks, who in 2001 states that he would never forget the image of seeing the plane hitting the light poles?

hi bob.

ever get sean and levi to recant their navy annex/NoC accounts yet?

didn't think so.

dom

 

[JimBenArm]

So many pages, and still no proof, let alone anything validated.

Such a poor performance. Yet so typical of insane idiots.

Maybe I'll go to that other thread and see if Chill has that banana split ready yet...

 

[Drudgewire]

So many pages, and still no proof, let alone anything validated.

Yeah at this point I think we can safely add "redundant" to the long list of words twoofers have their own unique definition of.

 

[bobloblaw]

what witnesses are you rambling on about?

Or how about Sean Boger -

[Redacted {Ranke identifies as Boger}] And so I am looking out at the road, and I see the traffic has liked stop, and I look out the window and I just hear a -- I just see like the nose and the wing of an aircraft just like coming right at us, and he didn't veer. And then you just heard the noise, and then he just smacked into the building, and when it hit the building, I am watching the plane go all the way into the building.
[Redacted {Interviewer}] Oh, my gosh.
[Sean Boger] So once the plane went into the building, it exploded, and once it exploded, I hit the floor and just covered up my head.

We still have not seen the explanation for how CIT's star witness Sean Boger managed to create this moment of fantasy in his head, especially given his prime location at the helipad control tower adjacent to the impact site.

In fact, and correct me if I am wrong here as I have not sat through the second part of the new presentation, but CIT are also yet to produce any evidence establishing Sean Boger and Levi Stephens as actual NoC witnesses despite continuing to use their names to support a list of 13 supposed Noc witnesses.

Why is this?

 

[bobloblaw]

hi bob.

ever get sean and levi to recant their navy annex/NoC accounts yet?

didn't think so.

dom

On the contrary Dom, as I just mentioned in the post above, we are yet to confirm that Levi Stephens and Sean Boger even made a NoC account, Dom.

Have you been able to confirm for us that Levi Stephens and Sean Boger made NoC accounts, Dom? If so, where is the evidence?

Why did Sgt. Chadwick Brooks make the claim in 2001 that he would never forget the sight of seeing the plane hitting the light poles?

 

[GregHouseMD]

TC239, others, please note...

I was struck by a similarity to a case I worked in the mid eighties.

I had to testify before the Dallas County Grand Jury, I had two VHS tapes that held evidence of the crime. I offered them to the Grand Jury FREE and they accepted them and returned an indictment.

See how that works?

I have to wonder what would have happened if I had explained the tapes would cost them $15 each or both for $25?

Any "Truther" want to expound on that?

(It's my dead horse, I can beat it all I like.)

 

[bobloblaw]

CIT also lie when they say they found noone supporting the SoC flight path.

Keith Wheelhouse, at CIT's request, drew the AA77 flightpath with the line clearly drawn south of the Citgo gas station.

Regardless of what CIT think of Wheelhouse's testimony, why do they continue to lie by saying that they have no on-the-record SoC witnesses?