Post your evidence that WTC was destroyed by demolition

[Quad4_72]

Homeland were you going to be posting your evidence?

 

[The Grave]

So does anyone think the USA trained real muslims to be terrorists, who genuinely thought they were acting for Ala yet were acting for the USA, to start a war for oil and power in the east, a stepping stone to bigger fish to fry - Iran?

And that this is the reason why the towers were toppled?

 

[Jonnyclueless]

Why is it that homelane, wholesoul, turbofan, and the new Citgo guy aren't here posting their evidence that apparently is an open shut case?

 

[Ragnarok]

It is the assertion of every demolition expert in the nation that no explosives were used at the WTC complex on the day of the jihadist attacks. The evidence for explosives is nonexistent: no seismic data showing secondary explosions, no physical evidence (bits of wiring or detonator caps), no chemical signatures. There are those who would find irony in your misuse of the word "asinine."

I don't know how reliable this site is http://911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html , but the following quote is taken from it.

While the aircraft crashes caused minimal earth shaking, significant earthquakes with unusual spikes occurred at the beginning of each collapse. The Palisades seismic data recorded a 2.1 magnitude earthquake during the 10-second collapse of the South Tower at 9:59:04 and a 2.3 quake during the 8-second collapse of the North Tower at 10:28:31.

If the impact of the planes only caused "minimal shaking", why would small bombs within the building be expected to be noticeable?

 

[T.A.M.]

So does anyone think the USA trained real muslims to be terrorists, who genuinely thought they were acting for Ala yet were acting for the USA, to start a war for oil and power in the east, a stepping stone to bigger fish to fry - Iran?

And that this is the reason why the towers were toppled?

Yes, lots of truthers believe this, or some elements of it.

Scary, I know.

TAM

 

[Tweeter]

Proof

 

[Pardalis]

Do you really need to fake your evidence Tweet?

Can't you see you're worse than the people you think are responsible by doing the same thing you're accusing them of doing?



"the video was done by Luc Courchesne, it was not meant to be used has a manipulative deception , the objective was to show how easy was to put a plane and to take it out of the video."

So it was admittedly faked.

Here's the real one:



You don't have any evidence so you have to fabricate it? Pathetic.

 

[Tweeter]

Thats the best fake everrrrr, or is it??

 

[Pardalis]

Thats the best fake everrrrr, or is it??

Twit.

You know there were about 60 people on that plane? And alot of people in the building died on impact. Don't you have any respect and decency left in you?

Let's be civil, please.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady

 

[Jontg]

Why would you continue with something you have had absolutely no success with?

Well, do you define success as convincing people you're right? Because I think you need to recheck those figures...

 

[Pardalis]

You know there were about 60 people on that plane? And alot of people in the building died on impact. Don't you have any respect and decency left in you?

You didn't answer me Tweeter.

Where's your self-respect? Do you have any shred of decency?

 

[Tweeter]

Sorry you feel that way, Pardalis.
I`m here to discuss alternate views of 9/11 , not to make friends or be ethical.

 

[Pardalis]

This video is a fake, you do know that?

 

[Pardalis]

How does it feel like to have to post a fake to support your ideas?

 

[WildCat]

Sorry you feel that way, Pardalis.
I`m here to discuss alternate views of 9/11 , not to make friends or be ethical.

Bold emphasis mine.

Sometimes you have to lie to get people to believe in THE TRUTH™

 

[Pardalis]

Bold emphasis mine.

Sometimes you have to lie to get people to believe in THE TRUTH™

Strange isn't it that twoofers fear Bush will turn America into a "1984" style dictatorship, while this video Tweeter keeps posting is the equivalent of 2+2=5.

 

[bio]

it seems, that (for most of you JREF-debunkers) it is enough to prove, that there may be another explanation for phenomenas (almost free fall speed, melted metal ...) than these explanations, offered by us truthers.
I am talking about probabilities and my impression is, that the cd-hypothesis is more likely than your theory. Or the other way round, what 100% prove do you have, that the Twins went down according to NIST?
Show me, what you have in your hands.

 

[Pardalis]

it seems, that (for most of you JREF-debunkers) it is enough to prove, that there may be another explanation for phenomenas (almost free fall speed, melted metal ...) than these explanations, offered by us truthers.

This thread is titled "post your evidence for CD"

Do it, or shut up.

 

[WildCat]

it seems, that (for most of you JREF-debunkers) it is enough to prove, that there may be another explanation for phenomenas (almost free fall speed, melted metal ...) than these explanations, offered by us truthers.
I am talking about probabilities and my impression is, that the cd-hypothesis is more likely than your theory.

There is no evidence at all for the claims of truthers.

Or the other way round, what 100% prove do you have, that the Twins went down according to NIST?

The Twins can't seem to beat anyone in the playoffs, but NIST has no position on that.

 

[bio]

This thread is titled "post your evidence for CD"

Do it, or shut up.

... I would say, that nobody posted an evidence and shut up yet.