CIT.....Time to call it a day

Bobert said:
Rob is a complete whacko. For some odd reason out of the blue he wants to talk to me via a post he made over at the ATS forum.
He says that soon enough he will have my number.
OOOOOOOOOOOOH.
I am shaking in my flip flops.
Click to expand...

Methinks ol' Rob is starting to feel the heat of so many BS flags being thrown on his crap. I've been in email contact with him regarding my PffT account (he told me I was "spam" now - another example of his failure to understand the definition of "reality") and he passed my latest email onto Craig/Lyte/Whatever the hell his name is who then sent me an email with his standard BS spiel.

They're getting spooked, no doubt.
 
pomeroo said:
Rob Balsamo just phoned me to protest that your information is incorrect. He is particularly indignant about the allegation of padded hours, which he regards as a serious accusation. Balsamo says he has reported you to the NTSB, the FAA, and the DOT. What is your evidence, specifically for the padded hours?
Click to expand...

It's nice that Rob has time to call Ron, the NTSB, FAA, DOT, etc, since supposedly he didn't have any time to correct his (still wrong) calculations.

I find most of Rob's actions (with the exception of the above call to Ron) highly predictable. I'm now the proud recipient of one 6-pack of beer for my 100% accurate prediction of Rob's response to my last e-mail. :)
 
Reheat said:
For the edification of folks here who are not familiar with the logging of flying time, there is a rather significant difference between time logged as a civilian under FAA Rules and the logging of military flying time.

As a civilian, flying time is logged from the beginning of taxi (when the aircraft moves under it's own power) until the engine(s) is/are shut down after flight. What this means is that at busy airports much of the logged flying time is actually taxi time.

Military flying time is logged from brake release on take-off to landing + 5 minutes or until engine shutdown, whichever occurs first.

The difference can amount to several hundred hours over a career of flying.
Click to expand...

So "Reheat"... just to make sure im clear. All civilian pilots, according to you, are "padding" their logbooks as opposed to mil drivers? Is that what you are saying here?

Or are you saying "Rob Balsamo" in particular, "padded" his logbook.

Be careful now, you have many civilian pilots on this forum (reportedly) that you are accusing of "padding logbooks" if your 'backpeddling' above is accurately interpreted.

So what is it "Reheat"?
 
Hey nicepants, looks like your training costs just went up. Because according to Reheat, you're padding your logbook hours. Dont worry though, you were paying too much already. .so whats anouther few thousand.

After all.. gas is pretty cheap these days.. considering the great ol USA has almost full control. No worries my friend. Im sure rental costs and instruction costs will come down. Then you wont have to be accused of "padding" by "Reheat" (anonymous internet 'expert')

:D
 
Last edited:
hxstamper said:
Reheat said:
For the edification of folks here who are not familiar with the logging of flying time, there is a rather significant difference between time logged as a civilian under FAA Rules and the logging of military flying time.

As a civilian, flying time is logged from the beginning of taxi (when the aircraft moves under it's own power) until the engine(s) is/are shut down after flight. What this means is that at busy airports much of the logged flying time is actually taxi time.

Military flying time is logged from brake release on take-off to landing + 5 minutes or until engine shutdown, whichever occurs first.

The difference can amount to several hundred hours over a career of flying.
Click to expand...



So "Reheat"... just to make sure im clear. All civilian pilots, according to you, are "padding" their logbooks as opposed to mil drivers? Is that what you are saying here? Or are you saying "Rob Balsamo" in particular, "padded" his logbook. Be careful now, you have many civilian pilots on this forum (reportedly) that you are accusing of "padding logbooks" if your 'backpeddling' above is accurately interpreted. So what is it "Reheat"?
Click to expand...


I really don’t understand posts like the above. You even quoted Reheat’s text above yours. He was describing prosaic civilian logging protocol versus military logging protocol. Everyone can see what he said. Who on Earth did you hope to convince that he was accusing civilian pilots of something nefarious? It’s simply bizarre.
 
"padded logbook" is the slang in aviation terms for logging hours you didnt earn. Real aviators know this is a serious accusation. "Reheat" throws it around like he doesnt know what he is talking about. If you arent a civilian aviator, goto flightinfo.com and claim the same exact thing "Reheat" has done (civilians have padded hours) and watch the reply.

The NTSB/FAA and DOT did reply to P4T for such accusations made by Reheat. This is another good reason "Reheat" will not offer up his name to debate P4T.

Reheat is a fraud. Reheat will never go on any aviation board making the accusations above. Reheat will never offer up his real name (even to 911myths), because he already has a "disposable" internet persona, which is already exposed among real aviation professionals and critical thinkers.
 
hxstamper said:
If you arent a civilian aviator, goto flightinfo.com and claim the same exact thing "Reheat" has done (civilians have padded hours) and watch the reply.
Click to expand...


Well, do you want me to claim the exact same thing that Reheat has done, or do you want me to claim that civilian pilots have padded their hours?
 
hxstamper said:
Reheat is a fraud. Reheat will never go on any aviation board making the accusations above. Reheat will never offer up his real name (even to 911myths), because he already has a "disposable" internet persona, which is already exposed among real aviation professionals and critical thinkers.
Click to expand...

So, whatta ya think the jerk Balsamo is gonna do next? At least he got a response from a Federal Agency that he hates so much. I wonder why the idiot can't get a response for his FDR crap? Could it be because he falsely accuses them of mass murder without evidence?

And WHO do you think those aviation professionals and critical thinkers might be? Surely, you don't think pffft has any more than a few, not including the head ignoramus, do you?
 
hxstamper said:
All civilian pilots, according to you, are "padding" their logbooks as opposed to mil drivers? Is that what you are saying here?
Click to expand...

What's a mil driver? Is that someone who drives a mil? (whatever that is)

You seem to be awfully concerned about Balsamo. Do you know that jerk?
 
hxstamper said:
"padded logbook" is the slang in aviation terms for logging hours you didnt earn. Real aviators know this is a serious accusation. "Reheat" throws it around like he doesnt know what he is talking about. If you arent a civilian aviator, goto flightinfo.com and claim the same exact thing "Reheat" has done (civilians have padded hours) and watch the reply.

The NTSB/FAA and DOT did reply to P4T for such accusations made by Reheat. This is another good reason "Reheat" will not offer up his name to debate P4T.

Reheat is a fraud. Reheat will never go on any aviation board making the accusations above. Reheat will never offer up his real name (even to 911myths), because he already has a "disposable" internet persona, which is already exposed among real aviation professionals and critical thinkers.
Click to expand...
As usual you lack the ability to understand what was said. Do you just hate 111 pilots, or what?

What did reheat get the DOT to say? Or are you all talk? Talk!

You could almost be Balsamo's twin, but then Balsamo is selling DVD and making a living! You are just a p4t anonymous keyboard, slow typing bandit, p4t apologist. Did I leave out the terms p4t used adjusted as they fit?

Some military pilots keep their own logs with times allowed by the FAA. That way they have more time than that logged by the USAF form 5, or what ever our time was kept on.

I missed it! Balsamo reported Reheat to the FAA for explaining "padded hours". Funny!; the FAA gets to hear from their favorite guy with nut case ideas on 9/11, who accused the FAA and NTSB of being in on murder; now he contacts them? Does Rob know the FAA screens the EKG at OKC and they have final say if you pass your flight physical? For someone so paranoid about the Government, why does he make sure they know who he is. HX or Turbofan already said their lives are at risk for making up junk ideas about 9/11. That is funny. The only risk is if their lack of judgment spills into their flying or driving! Paranoid pilots for truth is a much better title, pp4t! Do they have enough pilots to call themselves pilot(s)?
 
Last edited:
hxstamper said:
Reheat will never offer up his real name...
Click to expand...
and yet here you are, hxstamper, hmmm, what would you call that...oh yeah
hxstamper said:
"a disposable" internet persona
Click to expand...
Considering the mental instability of some of the CTists, I fully understand why someone would not want to reveal their name.

Buh bye now, hxstamper, you have yourself a great day.
 
Last edited:
hxstamper said:
Hey nicepants, looks like your training costs just went up. Because according to Reheat, you're padding your logbook hours. Dont worry though, you were paying too much already. .so whats anouther few thousand.
Click to expand...

Reheat never accused me of padding my hours, that comment was directed at Robby.

And as I stated on another thread where you made your other unsupported claim regarding my training costs:

nicepants said:
If you believe what I've paid to be in excess, simply explain what amount would be reasonable for my training thus far, and I'll show you, in detail, why you are wrong
Click to expand...
 
So, let me get this straight. Reheat is accusing Rob Balsamo of commiting a fraud on a federal document, a felony, but not taking it to the FAA or DOT? Nicepants, Reheat tried to save himself by saying all civilian pilots pad hours compared to mil (mil = military, seems Reheat isnt familiar with mil slang) to avoid DOT/FAA inquiry.

Nicepants, this is why you will always be a student paying too much for your training. You just implicated Reheat in a serious offense. Reheat, do you object? Or did you really mean all civilian pilots pad compared to military....? Or are you saying Rob fraudulently "padded" his logbook as "nicepants" has interpreted for you. Which is it?

A bit of a pickle here among the "critical thinkers". The best part is, lots are watching, and have your IP's. :D
 
Last edited:
mil driver, what a kid who wants to be a young sharp pilot uses to avoid using evidence about a FDR; did you make up that term?






I can see a debate now.

About the error you love to leave up proving there is no physics skills in p4t,
Click to expand...
Rob, I see you have made an incredibly dim-witted math/physics blunder on your web site. I have decided to use that massive blunder to encourage young people to learn math and physics so their work never looks so absurd as the 11.2 G blunder made by one of the founders of the false information DVD store, known as p4t. What a debate it would be. How many months does it take a p4t group of experts to correct major math and physics errors? Will it take you 5 years to correct, after taking math and physics to gain a passing grade.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
hxstamper said:
A bit of a pickle here among the "critical thinkers". The best part is, lots are watching, and have your IP's. :D
Click to expand...

Oh, a threat. Now I know why they say that the internet is serious business.

Very serious business. Pfft is watching.

Anyhow, is Rob Balsamo presently certified to be a "commercial airline pilot"?
 
Oh Nooooooooooo You Have My Ip!!!!!!!11!!!!!1!!!!!
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeek!!!!!1!!!1111!!!!!1!!!!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom