Has Ron Paul reached you yet?

Has Ron Paul reached you yet?

  • Total voters
    105
Lonewulf said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw

He doesn't quite make it out to be a "conspiracy", but he discounts Evolution altogether, it seems.

I want a president stronger in science, personally, and either Obama or Hillary seem to be support science far stronger than Ron Paul ever will.

And, yeah, see, that's the conspiracy theory.
Click to expand...

I think that's the straight story. Not a conspiracy theory

With Ron Paul, we will have the budget to pursue all the science and technology we want.

Sounds like you want nader in the white house. He will be much better than obamanation or hitlery.

Well whether he believes in evolution or not is irrelevant. It doesn't affect the issues. He still will allow people to fund it as long as the taxpayers don't have to pay for it.

He doesn't legislate taste. He believes that you are free to believe what ever you want.
 
Watched the video and he's right. It's not appropriate for the presidential race. Just like not wearing your flag lapel, or not saying the national anthem.

I actually believe evolution. I am an agnostic/nihilist, but Evolution exists. All of these animals have evolved over time that's just a fact, however he may be referring to the theory of evolution, which I am not well read on the THEORY of evolution. I assume it's about us starting as bacteria and evolving into what we are today, and as far as I know, he's right. There is not enough evidence on either side to make a conclusion.
 
Tokorona said:
Jerome refers to the belief (I first ran into reading a book by Elder) that the college scholarships and loans the government offers drives prices up.

... when it's really a combination of inflation and rising prices for materials.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...


I am not a fan of big government by any means, but one of the problems I have with the Libertarians is that they try to blame every evil under the sun on Government.
Of course, I feel that most Libertarians are anarchists at heart, and would really love, although only a few of them admit it, to get rid of government altogether.
 
I want a small effective government. I want to have my cake and eat it too.

The bigger the government the harder they fall. Big government is bad.
 
Last edited:
ronpaulisright said:
Watched the video and he's right. It's not appropriate for the presidential race. Just like not wearing your flag lapel, or not saying the national anthem.

I actually believe evolution. I am an agnostic/nihilist, but Evolution exists. All of these animals have evolved over time that's just a fact, however he may be referring to the theory of evolution, which I am not well read on the THEORY of evolution. I assume it's about us starting as bacteria and evolving into what we are today, and as far as I know, he's right. There is not enough evidence on either side to make a conclusion.
Click to expand...

So there is a difference between evolution and the theory of evolution?
 
Like I said I don't know. Possibly. I don't want to read wikipedia right now so I won't know until I decide to eventually read into it.
 
Lonewulf said:
It really does seem like conspiracy theories and Ron Paul go together.
Click to expand...

I don't have a source, but I seem to remember chemtrails showing up in a bill that Ron Paul introduced. Is that true?
 
Ladewig said:
I don't have a source, but I seem to remember chemtrails showing up in a bill that Ron Paul introduced. Is that true?
Click to expand...

That was Dennis Kucinich.

And to be fair, the bill was banning space based weapons in general, and chemtrails were merely mentioned in the context: "The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' ... include exotic weapons systems such as ... chemtrails." In that there's nothing inherently impossible about planes dumping chemcials from the sky (it's just that there's no evidence that they're being done right now) it seems reasonable that they would be included in such a bill. Although it does make you wonder about Kucinich. (Additionally, when he reproposed the bill in later sessions of Congress, he took the "exotic weapons" part of the bill out.)
 
Last edited:
Kucinich is not a CFR member and he it with Ron Paul and foreign policy and that is why I like both of those guys. Check this out. Guess who dennis would pick as a VP?

 
ronpaulisright said:
If only the world could vote for US president. The people have spoken, they want Ron Paul.

http://www.whowouldtheworldelect.com/
Click to expand...

My, what an astonishingly flawed poll. If one were truly interested in how people in other countries would vote, then one would offer the poll in languages other than English. Despite Ron Paul no longer being in the running for the Republican nomination, his picture and name are available to voters despite all other previously-eliminated candidates not appearing on the first page of the poll. No rational person could come close to believing that this poll is within light-years of being a representative sample of people from other countries given that only people who vote are those who stumble upon it or those who are directed to it by friends.

Furthermore, when one looks at the votes from the United States, one sees:

47689 votes for Ron Paul
10966 votes for Barack Obama
5607 votes for Dennis Kucinich
2614 votes for Hillary Clinton
1615 votes for Mike Gravel
1579 votes for Fred Thompson

Was there ever a well-constructed poll reported in the media that gave Ron Paul an 8-to-1 lead over the next highest scoring Republican?

Lastly, isn't one of the most fundamental aspects of Ron Paul's political platform that we shouldn't give a rat's ass about what people in other countries think?

The poll is beyond useless. It is nonsense through and through.
 
Last edited:
UserGoogol said:
That was Dennis Kucinich.

And to be fair, the bill was banning space based weapons in general, and chemtrails were merely mentioned in the context: "The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' ... include exotic weapons systems such as ... chemtrails." In that there's nothing inherently impossible about planes dumping chemcials from the sky (it's just that there's no evidence that they're being done right now) it seems reasonable that they would be included in such a bill. Although it does make you wonder about Kucinich. (Additionally, when he reproposed the bill in later sessions of Congress, he took the "exotic weapons" part of the bill out.)
Click to expand...

My bad. Still I would hesitate to include "chemtrails" in any legislation because there is no legal definition of the word.
 
Ladewig said:
My, what an astonishingly flawed poll. If one were truly interested in how people in other countries would vote, then one would offer the poll in languages other than English. Despite Ron Paul no longer being in the running for the Republican nomination, his picture and name are available to voters despite all other previously-eliminated candidates not appearing on the first page of the poll. No rational person could come close to believing that this poll is within light-years of being a representative sample of people from other countries given that only people who vote are those who stumble upon it or those who are directed to it by friends.

Furthermore, when one looks at the votes from the United States, one sees:

47689 votes for Ron Paul
10966 votes for Barack Obama
5607 votes for Dennis Kucinich
2614 votes for Hillary Clinton
1615 votes for Mike Gravel
1579 votes for Fred Thompson

Was there ever a well-constructed poll reported in the media that gave Ron Paul an 8-to-1 lead over the next highest scoring Republican?

Lastly, isn't one of the most fundamental aspects of Ron Paul's political platform that we shouldn't give a rat's ass about what people in other countries think?


The poll is beyond useless. It is nonsense through and through.
Click to expand...

No. That's bush and mccains platform.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom