CIT/Air America Debate Challenge

Can someone pleaes let me know when CIT is going to release its Ground breaking NEW evidence?

I aint playin!!!
 
LOL pooor widdle Aldo
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/single/?p=72578&t=277689
This is unbelieveable.

We are being drowned out. Two many chiefs and not enough Indians.

This is why we will fail. We have incredibly important evidence and Ron Weik and Barbara Honegger get more air time than Craig and Rob did. Sucks. All old info all bunk.

Whatever, you guys heard it. We've got a flyover witness(es).
Click to expand...
 
After having to listen to Craig and his disgusting comments about faked DNA and the victims of 9-11 I appreciated your closing comment Ron.
 
Ranke shoots himself in the foot. AGAIN

beachnut said:
He was in the Pentagon, south parking lot. Saw the plane continue.

He saw it fly by and hit the Pentagon.

Craig's witness sound like he is drunk. Now the plane is on the south parking lot; does Craig ever check this stuff?

All the stuff is false.
Click to expand...

:dl::dl::dl::dl:

Ladies and gentlemen, I bring you.. The SOUTH PARKING LOT!

parking-map-lg.gif
 
beachnut said:
He was in the Pentagon, south parking lot. Saw the plane continue.

He saw it fly by and hit the Pentagon.

Craig's witness sound like he is drunk. Now the plane is on the south parking lot; does Craig ever check this stuff?

All the stuff is false.
Click to expand...

LOL I was thinking that their witness seriously needed a tox screen.
 
Did I miss it?

I wanna see a transcript! Or a recording! Or something!
 
Frankly, I would love nothing more than for the CIT crew to become the face of the 9/11 twoof movement. Let them on air and allow America to hear how Flight 77 pulled up at the last second.

Do not oppose these idiots.
 
TC329 said:
Weick's first argument is an adhom. How jrefian of him.

Weick is an embarassment.

lol
Click to expand...


My point was that Griffin was lying. We do not have an honest disagreement. Griffin is someone who peddles falsehoods that have been debunked repeatedly.
 
Even debunkers admit that the hole was only 16ft across. They then go on to say that the wings folded back and entered that hole with the fuselage. why would anyone pretend that the hole was 90ft. FGS the section that collapsed was only 75 feet across..
 
Hey Ron. You got more air time than rob or Craig combined. And the host doesn't even play by his own rules. Did you notice how the host needed to excessive his poisoning the well logical fallacy even as the program closed?
 
Last edited:
theauthor said:
Even debunkers admit that the hole was only 16ft across. They then go on to say that the wings folded back and entered that hole with the fuselage. why would anyone pretend that the hole was 90ft. FGS the section that collapsed was only 75 feet across..
Click to expand...

Not true.

http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

Most of the serious structural damage was within a swath
that was approximately 75 to 80 ft wide and extended approximately
230 ft into the first floor of the building.This swath was
oriented at approximately 35 to 40 degrees to the perpendicular
to the exterior wall of the Pentagon.Within the swath of
serious damage was a narrower, tapering area that contained
most of the very severe structural damage. This tapering area
approximated a triangle in plan and had a width of approximately
90 ft at the aircraft’s entry point and a length of approximately
230 ft along the trajectory of the aircraft through the building.
Click to expand...
 
theauthor said:
Even debunkers admit that the hole was only 16ft across. They then go on to say that the wings folded back and entered that hole with the fuselage. why would anyone pretend that the hole was 90ft. FGS the section that collapsed was only 75 feet across..
Click to expand...


Nobody "admits" that the hole was 16 feet across because it was 90 feet.

(From The Pentagon Building Report)

"The width of the severe damage to the west facade of the Pentagon was approximately 120 ft (from column lines 8 to 20). The projected width, perpendicular to the path of the aircraft, was approximately 90 ft, which is substantially less than the 125 ft wingspan of the aircraft..."
 
theauthor said:
Even debunkers admit that the hole was only 16ft across. They then go on to say that the wings folded back and entered that hole with the fuselage. why would anyone pretend that the hole was 90ft. FGS the section that collapsed was only 75 feet across..
Click to expand...
The wings hit the Pentagon head on, at over 470 KIAS. Where do you make up this stuff? The impact marks are on the Pentagon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom