How were demolition blasts concealed from the public?

[theauthor]

I don't know what im talking about? Well I don't need to when you are giving me such great arguments. Thanks for pointing out that the boom he heard was actually a second EARLIER. I wouldn't have thought of that

 

[CHF]

If no twoofer can present a video of a CD sequence from 9/11 then perhaps it's time to start thinking of the OP.

Just how on earth did the NWO cover up the sound?

 

[theauthor]

please give a reference of how this witness determined the time of which he heard the "boom boom boom" and then the collapse.

Also show evdience that this person hear more than 5-6 booms but thousands needed to bring down Wtc 7


please also provide evidence of all the footage showing wtc7 collapse on why they did not cpature the THOUSANDS of explosions going off

Please show me how the delay due to the speed of sound strengthens your argument. You have now proven that the bang was actually TWO seconds before collapse. Thanks. That has made CD a greater possibility.

 

[theauthor]

If no twoofer can present a video of a CD sequence from 9/11 then perhaps it's time to start thinking of the OP.

Just how on earth did the NWO cover up the sound?

If no debunker can produce pictures of the inferno in wtc7 then perhaps it is time to start thinking just how did the NWO cover up the flames.

 

[Arus808]

I don't know what im talking about?

You've proven with every post you make that you dont.

Well I don't need to when you are giving me such great arguments. Thanks for pointing out that the boom he heard was actually a second EARLIER. I wouldn't have thought of that

you do realize that the penthouse collapsed into the building first right. imagine that. hearing the penthouse collapsing prior to the building collapsing.


DID YOU BOTHER TO WATCH ALL THOSE DEMOLITION VIDEOS YET?


seeing that you rather post, i doubt it


go on proving that you dont know what you are talking about.

 

[fullflavormenthol]

Please show me how the delay due to the speed of sound strengthens your argument. You have now proven that the bang was actually TWO seconds before collapse. Thanks. That has made CD a greater possibility.

Okay, dude; I am going to stop you right there. I am going to point out that no one has proven that anything occurred 1 to 2 seconds before. What has been brought up is that there is no way of knowing if your 1 to 2 seconds is accurate considering it is based upon the perception of a single person during a traumatic experience. Stop using stupid emoticons to express your joy at proving some point that you haven't

 

[Arus808]

Please show me how the delay due to the speed of sound strengthens your argument.

again you prove you do not know what you are talking about

Please provide a reference as to which how this witness determined the time from when he heard the "boom boom boom" and the collapse


If you can't, then how do you know it was only "2" seconds?

 

[CHF]

If no debunker can produce pictures of the inferno in wtc7 then perhaps it is time to start thinking just how did the NWO cover up the flames.

More importantly....how did the NWO get the FDNY to lie about seeing massive fires that weren't there?

 

[DC]

why dont we hear the penthouse Collapse on the videos???????

 

[theauthor]

More importantly....how did the NWO get the FDNY to lie about seeing massive fires that weren't there?

More importantly....how did the NWO get Craig Bartmer and the guy interviewed on the radio to lie about massive noises that werent there?

 

[DarkMagician]

So are the witnesses who heard the explosions lying? Is Craig Bartmer and the guy who described the thunderclap lying? yes or no?

The thing is that the sound of controlled demolition explosions are nowhere near the level of what you hear on 9/11. Other things can sound like explosions, but demolition explosives have a volume that those other things didn't reach.

In short, they can be telling the truth and it still doesn't help your claim. We're looking for proof of an explosion of a specific volume or higher that would help your case. You might want to try and find proof of that before you go ahead and show the witness statements. We don't know the level of sound from what they say, unless they had their eye on a decibel measurer at the time.

Also, it is no good to just have the witness testimony of the inferno in wtc7, we need a photo. There were lots of cameras that day, can you show us a photo of this fully involved inferno?

We already know you're going to move the goalposts after we show you pics, so why bother asking the question when we know you're going to redefine inferno to something that's not useful to anyone involved? Besides, it's off topic, but search for other threads on it before starting your own. We've heard this [rule 10] before.

 

[theauthor]

again you prove you do not know what you are talking about

Please provide a reference as to which how this witness determined the time from when he heard the "boom boom boom" and the collapse


If you can't, then how do you know it was only "2" seconds?

Admit you made a mistake about the sound delay. If you can't then your intellectual dishonesty means you go on ignore.

 

[Brainache]

why dont we hear the penthouse Collapse on the videos???????

Because there were no demolition charges going off.

 

[fullflavormenthol]

Admit you made a mistake about the sound delay. If you can't then your intellectual dishonesty means you go on ignore.

Wow...ultimatums are always a sign of a strong argument. Speaking of intellectual dishonesty, you might want to look back at an earlier post in which you blatantly engaged in a false dichotomy.

 

[Arus808]

Admit you made a mistake about the sound delay. If you can't then your intellectual dishonesty means you go on ignore.

excuse me but you're the one being intellectually dishonest here. You are the one claiming that person heard 5 booms then 2 seconds later saw the building collapse

yet you forget:

1) sound travel slower than light
2) the penthouse was shown to COLLAPSE first before the entire building collapse (do you honestly believe that the penthouse collapsed silently?)
3) that said witness did not hear the THOUSANDS of explosions needed to bring down a building the size of wtc 7?

HE, in your own example GAVE only 5 booms (count them).


So, who is being dishonest here? NOt me . YOu are.

You are twisting the claims of ONE (count them ONE) witness; twisiting his SIMILE (you do know what that is right?), to describe A CHAOTIC event


So explain why there weren't thousands of explosions?

 

[theauthor]

excuse me but you're the one being intellectually dishonest here. You are the one claiming that person heard 5 booms then 2 seconds later saw the building collapse

yet you forget:

1) sound travel slower than light
2) the penthouse was shown to COLLAPSE first before the entire building collapse (do you honestly believe that the penthouse collapsed silently?)
3) that said witness did not hear the THOUSANDS of explosions needed to bring down a building the size of wtc 7?

HE, in your own example GAVE only 5 booms (count them).


So, who is being dishonest here? NOt me . YOu are.

You are twisting the claims of ONE (count them ONE) witness; twisiting his SIMILE (you do know what that is right?), to describe A CHAOTIC event


So explain why there weren't thousands of explosions?

Ignore it is then.

 

[Arus808]

Ignore it is then.

yup, you can't handle it when you're painted into a corner WITH YOUR OWN WORDS


So your dishonesty is noted, and you have proven yet gain you're nothing more than a liar.

 

[fullflavormenthol]

Ignore it is then.

You that is just what I was saying when I read your post. Arus808 explained themself and did so in a logical way that was by no means intellectually dishonest.

What you are doing is using juvenile behavior (the lol's and smileys) to put across the appearance that you are confident in what you are writing, which you are not confident. You are not confident because you grabbed onto the most flimsy excuse to ignore someone making an effective counter argument.

Meaning you have no interest in an actual debate; hence you go on ignore.

 

[gumboot]

why dont we hear the penthouse Collapse on the videos???????

I'm not aware of any videos close enough to WTC7 during its collapse to pick up any sounds from the collapse.

 

[DC]

and why dont we hear that penthouse collapse in the videos?