[Merged]Al Qaeda To Iran: Stop Spreading 9/11 CTs!

And why do I get the feeling that his rejection of said evidence will in no way effect, well... anything.
 
Well if it's his job, I guess that he has to in order to get paid. The question is, who is paying him? Who gains the most from the 9/11 CT? I tthink South Park is right, the 9/11 Movement is a Government Conspiracy to make themselves look far more competent and omnipotent than they ever could be. That means it is obvious who pays Clippy. He's a CIA plant to make Bush and Cheney look like they can actually figure their way out of a Paper bag.
 
Clippy said:
I can give you examples of good evidence...
Click to expand...

Actually, I don't think you can. In fact, not only do I think you can't, I believe you have absolutely no interest in doing so. Instead, you seem more interested in following the well-worn path laid out by other truthers who wander over here for a while and eventually lose interest and fade away without making the slightest impact. They offer nothing but a whiney, embarassingly juvenile attitude that in their limited little worlds passes for sarcastic wit.


...but my job is really just to reject your bad evidence.
Click to expand...

If so, you're doing it exceedingly poorly.


...If you could provide the paper trail showing bin Laden financed the attacks, that would be good evidence. Oh wait, the commission decided that wasn't relevant.
Click to expand...

Get serious. If a confession doesn't do it for you, a paper trail wouldn't either. You'd just say it was faked or something. After all, if you can somehow dismiss the mountain of evidence that supports the "official" version of 9/11 and instead base your views on shadows, stray pixels, and recycled crap that's been debunked a million times, your mind is pretty much capable of any flight into fantasyland.
 
Alareth said:
And bad evidence is anything that dosn't implicate the US govenment as responsible for the events of 9/11, correct?
Click to expand...

No bad evidence is whatever his handlers tell him is bad evidence, you expect him to be able to think for himself? They don't get paid for that.
 
This makes me laugh. It makes me think of a scenario like this at the Majlis in Tehran:

Phone rings. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad picks up
MA: Allo?

OBL: Hey Mahmoud! It's Osama!

MA: Osama? I haven't talked to you in ages! How's the cave life handling you?

OBL: It's ok, I've gotten used to it. I just called to tell you that I have been reading the news about what you say about 9/11. WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU THINKING? OF COURSE WE COMMITTED THOSE ATTACKS!

MA: But listen Osama, it says on the internet here that the US government and Mossad used drones to hit the buildings, there was a mysterious pod at the bottom of United Flight 175, the planes landed in Cleveland and the missile or plane that hit the Pentagon flew North of the Citgo station. It's all here, do you want me to send you the links? You can also watch this on YouTube. Also, Osama, what about WTC7? No plane hit that, yet it collapsed, where were you in that?

OBL: Oh great Allah...
 
Clippy said:
Which one? Better make a few copies. And I think Fatty wants some buttered popcorn too.
Click to expand...

Why do you repeat long debunked and discredited lies, made up by lying conspiracy theorists?
 
It's funny, the perps themselves admit to the crime and still the Truthers don't believe it.

They will allow nothing to convince them. It is worse than Young Earth Creationists who believe that dinosaur bones were placed in the ground by God in order to test their faith. Every piece of evidence against them is "faked" or "planted" by the government/Illuminati/Jews.
 
1337m4n said:
It's funny, the perps themselves admit to the crime and still the Truthers don't believe it.

They will allow nothing to convince them. It is worse than Young Earth Creationists who believe that dinosaur bones were placed in the ground by God in order to test their faith. Every piece of evidence against them is "faked" or "planted" by the government/Illuminati/Jews.
Click to expand...

it will only hardly convince LIHOPers i think :)
 
1337m4n said:
Why do you repeat long debunked and discredited lies, made up by lying conspiracy theorists?
Click to expand...

That's a pretty stupid question to ask a twoofer. They ALL think that they are the first ones to bring up these claims. Ah, the lemmings...
 
Jonnyclueless said:
That's a pretty stupid question to ask a twoofer. They ALL think that they are the first ones to bring up these claims. Ah, the lemmings...
Click to expand...

Everyday is year zero on the internet. Just change the name and come out with the same tired old stuff time and time again in the hope that the lack of response (boredom) can allow them to claim victory back with their chums.

And, of course, we have the somewhat new phenomena of the 'truth' movement actually trying to address the oft repeated concerns of rational people about their lack of professional, expert opinion and lack of peer reviewed papers.

So now we have the 'architects and (any) engineers (other than structural) for truth' as a desperate attempt to counter the former, and Jones's recent 'letter of agreement with NIST' to counter the latter.

They shoot horses don't they?
 
Last edited:
How will the troofers spin this one?

Al-Qaida No. 2 says 9/11 theory propagated by Iran (AP via Yahoo)

CAIRO, Egypt - Osama bin Laden's chief deputy in an audiotape Tuesday accused Shiite Iran of trying to discredit the Sunni al-Qaida terror network by spreading the conspiracy theory that Israel was behind the Sept. 11 attacks.

...

Al-Zawahri accused Hezbollah's Al-Manar television of starting the rumor.

"The purpose of this lie is clear — (to suggest) that there are no heroes among the Sunnis who can hurt America as no else did in history. Iranian media snapped up this lie and repeated it," he said.

"Iran's aim here is also clear — to cover up its involvement with America in invading the homes of Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq," he said.

...
Click to expand...

Emphasis added.

The usual disclaimers apply.
 
What's to spin? So al-Qaida is now on the debunking side.

It just goes to show they want bragging rights to 9/11.
 
1337m4n said:
Why do you repeat long debunked and discredited lies, made up by lying conspiracy theorists?
Click to expand...

Debunked where? On the 911myths site given by PhantomWolf? Sorry, that was a half-hearted attempt. I don't see a 'midpoint between the two top pictures' (whatever that means). To his credit, the author is pretty modest as to what he's shown. Are there better sites that debunk this?

Why should I have to go to 911myths site to debunk what strikes the viewer as an obvious discrepancy between the confession tape bin Laden and 'real' bin Laden? Shouldn't the CIA have provided this analysis when they released the confession?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom