just cause you claim its debunked, does not mean its debunked, do you know exactly what it is? or do you have your own theorys about it? like molten aluminium?
http://11-settembre.blogspot.com/2007/02/ups-on-81st-floor-of-wtc2.html
http://www.debunking911.com/moltensteel.htm
I cited the facts for you, and pointed you towards information that explains to you why your theories not only are nonsense, but how they can't physically be possible because THERE IS NO EVIDENCE SUPPORTING YOUR CLAIM. You ignored them. You can lead a jackass to water, but you can't make him drink.
interesting theorys but not so convincing. especially the part, color says nothing, that totaly contradicts what i learned about metal. a smith would totaly disagree with that. the color is very important to him. especially a few decades ago
Oh? What "theories" are interesting and why? Can you explain what they get wrong and how?
Didn't think so.
dont you read your own sources? from the batterys, in the part about high amperes and the voltage :/ thats the best point in the whole thing. would it be a truther site, you would point out his claim about how NIST confirmed his theory, wich they didnt, they just confirmed that there was indeed reinforcments on those floors.
You do realize, do you not, that those same batteries were leaking lead, which you took as evidence of "thermite?" There was no thermite, champ. None. Never was. Ever. There is no evidence of this. No matter what you or the fraud Steven Jones wants to believe.
One of us is wrong, and it's you.
to me it does mather alot what i belive
As for the facts about 9-11, it doesn't matter what you believe. Facts are facts, evidence is evidence. We're concerned with facts and evidence, you're concerned with baseless belief, fact-free fantasy and religion.
well about the squibs im not convinced about ait, because thats not how i think air will react under pressure by the collapse.
HOW
SHOULD IT REACT, GENIUS? How many times has the WTC terrorist attack happened? Never before?
You have no frame of reference. You're like a child who wanders in...oh, never mind.
just my oppinion. and only based on videos of those squibs.
Those aren't squibs. You have utterly failed to prove they are, because there is no chemical fingerprint, residue, physical damage to the structure or anything else to indicate an explosive. That's it. The facts are not on you side. You're wrong.
http://www.debunking911.com/overp.htm
Stop repeating this blatant, baseless lie.
when your convinced that it is only air, fine
Unless you can provide evidence of EXPLOSIVES, you have nothing to stand on. You're ignorant - deliberately so - so that means you're now lying. You've been shown that
they are not squibs, and you are ignoring it because it is far too inconvenient for you to incorporate new, contrary information into your Troofer religion.
That's because you're not paying attention and are ignoring facts inconvenient for the cult of Trooferism.
When you feel like joining reality again, we'll be here.
