Why is it that you are the only one talking about his religion here? I couldn't care less if he warshipped the devil. Stop with your derailing tactics and lets stay on point.
Of those 7, I'd like to know how many were on site at WTC7.
Larry Silverstein Takes Questions....
- Thread starter Sizzler
- Start date
Why is it that you are the only one talking about his religion here? I couldn't care less if he warshipped the devil. Stop with your derailing tactics and lets stay on point.
Of those 7, I'd like to know how many were on site at WTC7.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
Or mistaken? If not why?
Please explain how you come to that conclusion from what I posted. I gotta hear this one.
The people making the complain in your link, which include Silverstein, are complaining that the insurance companies are profiting from the delays of the work at Ground Zero.
What does that have to do with this thread?
Derailing tactics? I'm just asking questions but I guess the impotent truth movement can't handle questions.
Can you read? I said 7 WERE ON SITE. Please learn to read if you expect anyone to ever take you seriously.
Good question. These are my reasons.
1. Nigro denies the conversation took place and did not suggest any other commander at the time had such conversation.
2. On 9-11 in all the panic and chaos, I think calling Larry would have served no cause. It doesn't make sense that anyone would feel the need to call him. At least to me that is.
3. Larry refused to answer who he actually spoke to when told that Nigro denies any such conversation.
This thread is pointless.
I gather, that what Sizzler is trying to imply is that Silverstein is lying about a conversation that took place. I find it to be more likely, that Larry Silverstein may have mistaken who he was talking to. Perhaps it is Nigro, who simply forgets speaking to Silverstein. My question is, why does it matter?
Sizzler then takes his pretty much baseless accusation, and invites blind speculation on top of it. Typical truther logic. Establish a premise, usually based on false, and shaky info....make up things, based on this premise. Fit this premise into any kind of story.
This Silverstein stuff, is a non issue.
I gather, that what Sizzler is trying to imply is that Silverstein is lying about a conversation that took place. I find it to be more likely, that Larry Silverstein may have mistaken who he was talking to. Perhaps it is Nigro, who simply forgets speaking to Silverstein. My question is, why does it matter?
Sizzler then takes his pretty much baseless accusation, and invites blind speculation on top of it. Typical truther logic. Establish a premise, usually based on false, and shaky info....make up things, based on this premise. Fit this premise into any kind of story.
This Silverstein stuff, is a non issue.
Last edited:
332nd
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2006
- Messages
- 11,278
Here's 2 of them.
ETA: That link is a pretty good article too.
http://www.onderzoek911.nl/media/tijdschrift/fire_engineering_wor.shtml
ETA: That link is a pretty good article too.
Last edited:
There are other possibilities. What if the insurance company was publicly traded, and the underwriters received kickbacks from Silverstein's insurance claims? To assume an insurance company's underwriters have the exact same interests as the company's shareholders is not necessarily correct.
There is a lot of corruption on Wall Street these days. Bear Stearns tried to unload all of it's bad sub-prime mortgages to its subsidiary Everquest, and then take Everquest public. Do you really think the Everquest executives, who were BSC executives weren't aware of what was going on? They get paid regardless.
I asked a follow up question. How many were on site at WTC7?
If by onsite you meant WTC7's site, then you already answered my question. But if by onsite you meant, WTC complex, my question has not been answered.
Do you know the answer?
Again, relevance with this thread?
Excellent!! It is certainly possible that these individuals could have made the call.
Considering you are trying to argue semantics, it is apparent you are unarmed. Why didn't you answer my question? Are you accusing Silverstein of lying instead of the possibility of you being wrong because he is a joo?
ETA - The obvious avoidance of an answer last time I asked would prove to AJ and We Are Change that you are guilty
Last edited:
Nope, but I assumed from an earlier thread that Nigro was the man in charge that day.
I am rethinking my position due to Redtails contribution. I will also digg up that old thread and look into it for more details.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
Personally I think he talked to someone in the FDNY (more than likely a higher up not on the scene) and his office initiated the call at his request. That would explain why Nigro wouldn't know about it. The FDNY would not have calling him as a priority of what to do that day. I also think his answers are just him trying to sound like someone in control of something he had no control.
So he didn't lie.
Chief Nigro was the one assumed to have been the one who called, nobody ever said or confirmed that it was actually him, including Silverstein.
So how do you feel about accusing someone without proof on an internet forum?
Last edited:
To translate this to human language...I made a hasty decision without enough information.