• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

All you need to know

And it's ignored once again...

Anyway, Richard, if you were trying to act in the interest of fairness, why did you lack Kucinich's belief in aliens, or anything of the mass of quotes from Ron Paul?

I mean, if you were trying to be fair, you should have covered all the bases.

What's more, you included Guiliani. RP fans are the only ones still talking about Guiliani.
 
Last edited:
mortimer said:
Really? You think that? Certainly politicians in other parts of the world have used verbal threats against us, and we haven't ever nuked them because of the threats.
Click to expand...


Mhm, "energy"-dependence isn't a threat?
Oh wait, it was the WMD threat, I forgot. :rolleyes::p

By the way - is a probable threat towards Israel a
direct threat towards the US? (Some American
Politicians speak exactly this way)

Anyway - your quoted statement doesn't make
any factual sense, sorry.
 
Oliver said:
Anyway - your quoted statement doesn't make
any factual sense, sorry.
Click to expand...

So I take that to mean that you agree with Richard Masters that if some politician in another country made a threat to bomb the US, that the US would declare that politician a Nazi and nuke that politician's country?
 
You'd think we'd have less an issue with overpopulation, were that the case...
 
Thorn said:
And it's ignored once again...

Anyway, Richard, if you were trying to act in the interest of fairness, why did you lack Kucinich's belief in aliens, or anything of the mass of quotes from Ron Paul?

I mean, if you were trying to be fair, you should have covered all the bases.

What's more, you included Guiliani. RP fans are the only ones still talking about Guiliani.
Click to expand...

I should have included Romney's plasticness. I'm not so sure about Kucinich's belief in aliens, as I believe they probably exist, too. If you mean his belief he has seen them, well, I just forgot.

Of course I included Giuliani, he has the juiciest quotation, and he is the biggest threat to your civil rights.
 
mortimer said:
So I take that to mean that you agree with Richard Masters that if some politician in another country made a threat to bomb the US, that the US would declare that politician a Nazi and nuke that politician's country?
Click to expand...

He can't agree with me on that, since I don't believe it myself. I clearly noted it was hyperbole, but likened it to our history of demonizing Ahmadinejad.
 
Richard Masters said:
I should have included Romney's plasticness. I'm not so sure about Kucinich's belief in aliens, as I believe they probably exist, too. If you mean his belief he has seen them, well, I just forgot.

Of course I included Giuliani, he has the juiciest quotation, and he is the biggest threat to your civil rights.
Click to expand...

Also isn't running. :p
 
Thorn said:
Evolution =/= Theology, theology = Evolution denial.
Click to expand...
First right, second wrong.

Theology = the study of religion.

  1. the rational and systematic study of religion and its influences and of the nature of religious truth
  2. a particular system or school of religious beliefs and teachings; "Jewish theology"; "Roman Catholic theology"
  3. the learned profession acquired by specialized courses in religion (usually taught at a college or seminary); "he studied theology at Oxford"
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
Click to expand...
Care to try again? :)

DR
 
Undesired Walrus said:
I like-

'We have no moral responsibility (To help Darfur)'- Ron Paul

Nice.
Click to expand...

In Many ways Ron Paul's foreign policy is even more arrogant and self centered then Bush's.
BUsh at least seem to have some understanding that the US is part of a greater world, Paul seems to have none and thinsk the US can completely withdraw from the world except for "Trade" (ie,whatever dough we can make off them).
People outside the US seems to have no status as human beings at times to Paul,and his occasional condemnation of the "Empire" seems to rest more on the grounds he does not like paying taxes to pay for it (of course Paul seems to not want to pay taxes for anything) then for whatever harm current US foreign Policy does to other people.
ANd notice how the Ronulans seem to like to defend and paint in a positive light such regimes as China,Iran, etc, whose policy on individual freedom (which they claim to love so much) is worse then anything then the US has done?
 
Last edited:
Darth Rotor said:
First right, second wrong.

Theology = the study of religion.


Care to try again? :)

DR
Click to expand...

My apologies, I meant to state that there is no reason to deny evolution outside of the theological. I should have stated it clearly.
 
McCain's "100 year war in Iraq" is turning into the "Al Gore says he invented the internet" thing. Meaning it's a total lie that gets passed around until everyone believes it.

He said we may keep A BASE IN IRAQ for 50 or 100 years, and even followed up this by mentioning how we still have bases in Germany and Japan.

So, to make it plain:

HE NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER SAID THE WAR OR OCCUPATION WOULD LAST 100 YEARS. ANYONE WHO SAYS THAT IS LYING TO YOUR FACE.

You, Richard Masters, are a liar.

Thank you, carry on.
 
David Wong said:
McCain's "100 year war in Iraq" is turning into the "Al Gore says he invented the internet" thing. Meaning it's a total lie that gets passed around until everyone believes it.

He said we may keep A BASE IN IRAQ for 50 or 100 years, and even followed up this by mentioning how we still have bases in Germany and Japan.

So, to make it plain:

HE NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER SAID THE WAR OR OCCUPATION WOULD LAST 100 YEARS. ANYONE WHO SAYS THAT IS LYING TO YOUR FACE.

You, Richard Masters, are a liar.

Thank you, carry on.
Click to expand...

As far as generating more anti-American sentiment and making more terrorists, whats the difference?

You are lying to yourself if you think there is a difference.
 
Last edited:
David Wong said:
McCain's "100 year war in Iraq" is turning into the "Al Gore says he invented the internet" thing. Meaning it's a total lie that gets passed around until everyone believes it.

He said we may keep A BASE IN IRAQ for 50 or 100 years, and even followed up this by mentioning how we still have bases in Germany and Japan.

So, to make it plain:

HE NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER SAID THE WAR OR OCCUPATION WOULD LAST 100 YEARS. ANYONE WHO SAYS THAT IS LYING TO YOUR FACE.

You, Richard Masters, are a liar.

Thank you, carry on.
Click to expand...

I just quoted McCain; you simply chose to interpret the quotation as a lie.

He was asked about the possibility of staying in Iraq for 50 years, and he said, "Make it a hundred".

To those of you who don't know, our military presence in the Middle East fuels terrorism. Conclusion: McCain is retarded.
 
Richard Masters said:
To those of you who don't know, our military presence in the Middle East fuels terrorism. Conclusion: McCain is retarded.
Click to expand...

So if you have kids, and one of them throws a fit when you try to dress them, do you let them have their way and run around naked?
 
Richard Masters said:
I just quoted McCain; you simply chose to interpret the quotation as a lie.

He was asked about the possibility of staying in Iraq for 50 years, and he said, "Make it a hundred".

To those of you who don't know, our military presence in the Middle East fuels terrorism. Conclusion: McCain is retarded.
Click to expand...
If the United States wants to build bases on Saudi Arabian soil (an issue bin Ladin cited as a reason for 9/11), that's between the government of the United States and the government of Saudi Arabia. The opinion of an Islamo-fascist living in a cave in Afghanistan doesn't enter the equation. To pretend that bin Ladin's argument is anything besides prejudice is laughable.

But hey, maybe you're right. Slavery fueled the Civil War, so we should have just avoided the whole incident and let the South keep slaves, right? Desegregation fueled violence from the KKK, so maybe we should have just kept everything segregated, right?

I want a president who's going to do what he thinks is best for this country, not one who's going to cave and adapt our foreign policy in fear of threats from suicidal lunatics.
 
I don't even agree with the context of our invasion, and I'm not stupid enough to believe our occupation is the cause of terrorism. Yes, it does turn people that way, but even before our occupation, terrorism was based on the sheer existence of the western world.

Well, not as blanket as that, but violence has existed there for thousands of years before the US, odds are something else would be causing it if we weren't there.
 
I wonder, if there existed a bunch of crazy fanatical terrorists who targeted the West if we didn't have a military presence in the Middle East, would the heads of the Paulistas in this thread explode, trying to decide which set of religious fanatics to obey?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom