• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

So when does Paul drop out?

Jerome, thanks for living up to the stereotype we all have of the Paulistas.

COMEDY GOLD!
 
Now that we have all the RP supporters here, I want to see if I can get them to answer the OP's question:

When does RP drop out? Surely he is done for, and it would be a waste to continue, so when does he drop?
 
Dr. Lao said:
Jerome, you got schooled. You said 24 and were disproven.

And, for the record, I voted yesterday for McCain. Not my favorite person, but better than the rest.

And my state, a hotbed of libertarianism, managed a 4% for Paul. Despite thousands of signs illegally hung all over the place.

A bunch of dorks with signs does not a revolution make.
Click to expand...

It doesn't concern you that you have to vote for the lesser of the available evils every cycle?

Where did you get that it was illegal to have campaign signs at a caucus? Are you making things up again? There were tons of em from all candidates in my precinct. Most for Ron Paul BTW.
 
FM21.105 said:
Now that we have all the RP supporters here, I want to see if I can get them to answer the OP's question:

When does RP drop out? Surely he is done for, and it would be a waste to continue, so when does he drop?
Click to expand...

Set the trap and............

What? You want us to answer the hypothetical of something only RP or his campaign advisers are in the know about? So the RP haters can reticule any answer that is given.

Why doesn't everyone reply with whom they are supporting for this 2008 presidential election?

Chicken McFly?
 
HereticHulk said:
It doesn't concern you that you have to vote for the lesser of the available evils every cycle?

Where did you get that it was illegal to have campaign signs at a caucus? Are you making things up again? There were tons of em from all candidates in my precinct. Most for Ron Paul BTW.
Click to expand...

The worst evil for me would be to vote for Ron Paul.

I never said signs were illegal at a caucus. I am angry that the Paulistas littered up every freeway bridge, light rail bridge, and intersection islands with signs. That is a no no here, and really bad form. They also nailed them up to trees which isn't cool either.
 
Dr. Lao said:
The worst evil for me would be to vote for Ron Paul.

I never said signs were illegal at a caucus. I am angry that the Paulistas littered up every freeway bridge, light rail bridge, and intersection islands with signs. That is a no no here, and really bad form. They also nailed them up to trees which isn't cool either.
Click to expand...

LOL!

Shirley, you cannot be serious?
 
Yeah, hanging gigantic banners off of bridges and trespassing onto rail bridges to hang signs.

That is against the law. Signs are allowed, but there are rules. And, I would expect that the signs come down after Paul drops out or when the election is over. Its called being responsible.
 
Elizabeth I said:
Matteo, the "so what" is that the point of politics is to be able to govern. It makes NO DIFFERENCE what your policies or principles are if you are unable to get to a position where you are able to apply them. Henry Clay said, "I had rather be right than be President," which is very noble but didn't do a lot to advance his agenda.
Click to expand...

I can not see why you can say that Obama (which I also like) is able to govern, while Paul is not.
Do you have a reason for that?
Or, should we talk about Mr. "half-a-million-plus-civilian-killed-war" Bush?
What do you exactly consider as a factor in being able to govern?
Endorsement of theory of evolution?
 
mortimer said:
Strawman. I was clearly talking about Paul not spending his campaign donations on getting his message out. I said nothing about Paul being right or wrong.

By the way, he's wrong.
Click to expand...

This is what you wrote:
"Wonder if Paul is going to give back all that money he didn't spend on advertising to his donors, or if he's just gonna pocket it. I'm thinking the latter. Message to Ron Paul supporters: SUCKERS! "

When RP will pocket the money, you can talk.
BTW, do other candidates give back the money?
 
HereticHulk said:
Set the trap and............
Click to expand...

I've set no trap, I've only asked a question.

What? You want us to answer the hypothetical of something only RP or his campaign advisers are in the know about? So the RP haters can reticule any answer that is given.
Click to expand...

My question was based only on opinion. My opinion is that he should have dropped months ago. I just seek your opinion[/quote]

Why doesn't everyone reply with whom they are supporting for this 2008 presidential election?
Click to expand...

So you can continue dodging questions? The reason no one does that is because that has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ORIGINAL QUESTION. Perhaps you've misread the thread title. Allow me to reiterate it for you:

"When does Ron Paul drop out"

It's asking a simple question. It's not "when does ron paul drop, BUT FIRST tell me who you support before even THINKING of answering any questions regarding Ron Paul"

Maybe if you answered our questions first, we'd be more reluctant to answers yours.

Or perhaps you should just start a thread asking everyone who they support. But I know you won't do that, because that means you'll have no other outing when someone dare challenges your Ron Flaw...er...Ron Paul
 
dudalb said:
It is painfully obvious that Paul has no idea how to effectively spend all that money he raised.
The Giuliani Campaign ,one of the most inept in recent memory,looks like a work of brilliance compared to the incomptence displayed by the Paul Campaign.
Click to expand...

Heh. Yea, well. You know, maybe Paul considers himself as the government of his campaign, thus vetos every "extra spending"! Something like that! :p

Ah, the ******* MoRons. I love them. But soon, soon we will learn to hate them even more when they keep littering the interwebs with their fraud here, NWO there yadda yadda yadda. :(
 
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Fcta2Cjlplg

I always thought George Stephanopolus was rather prescient regarding Paul's chances.

To answer the OP's question: He'll probably continue the ghost until the convention, and save the money for another congressional campaign.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom