Split Thread WTC7 collapse (again) - split from: How did you rule out that 911 was an insid

[Totovader]

Christopher7: Can you find a single example of a CD- ever in the entire history of building demolitions- that was:

1) On fire for several hours before the collapse.
2) Was a high rise and feel top-down.
3) Was done by Firefighters.
4) Did not have any tell-tale explosive sounds.

Happy hunting.

 

[Totovader]

Christopher7: Can you find a single example of a CD- ever in the entire history of building demolitions- that was:

1) On fire for several hours before the collapse.
2) Was a high rise and feel top-down.
3) Was done by Firefighters.
4) Did not have any tell-tale explosive sounds.

Happy hunting.

Oh, and I almost forgot:

5) LEFT ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER OF A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION

I'd really like you to find an example for #5- that would be a hoot.

 

[Pardalis]

Chris, the collapse may look like a CD to laypeople. So what? What exactly are you trying to prove by appealing to laypeople's uninformed guess of what this collapse vaguely looks like?

What is your point? Will you get to it already?

 

[Pardalis]

I use this often as an example.

Take this critter:

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a154/perdalis/lrg-359-.jpg

To a layperson, it looks like a rodent, but if you look closer, and investigate its genes, habits and bone structure, you will come to the conclusion that it is not and that it is in fact more closely related to elephants than mice.

Do you get it now?

ETA to make it more clear:

A layperson's guess of what something looks like is irrelevant in contrast to the evidence.

 

[Christopher7]

The owner of a CD company that does work similar to what you are claiming is being done, here.

Nice try- but you and I both know that Jowenko has never done anything remotely close to a high rise.

Wrong

http://www.jowenko.com/index.php/1,16,1

 

[Christopher7]

I use this often as an example.

Take this critter:

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a154/perdalis/lrg-359-.jpg

To a layperson, it looks like a rodent, but if you look closer, and investigate its genes, habits and bone structure, you will come to the conclusion that it is not and that it is in fact more closely related to elephants than mice.

Do you get it now?

ETA to make it more clear:

A layperson's guess of what something looks like is irrelevant in contrast to the evidence.

Can you admit that the implosion of WTC7 looks like a CD?

 

[Pardalis]

Can you admit that the implosion of WTC7 looks like a CD?

You are a mental case.

Keep in mind the Membership Agreement and do not use personal attacks or insults to argue your point.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson

 

[Christopher7]

Chris, the collapse may look like a CD to laypeople. So what? What exactly are you trying to prove by appealing to laypeople's uninformed guess of what this collapse vaguely looks like?

What is your point? Will you get to it already?

The point?

Of course, the POINT!

Can you admit that the implosion of WTC7 was cd?

 

[Pardalis]

Can you admit that the implosion of WTC7 was cd?

Did you make a typo or did you deliberately change your question?

 

[Christopher7]

You are a mental case.

You haven't answered the simple question yet.

 

[Pardalis]

You haven't answered the simple question yet.

Which one? Now there seems to be two of them.

 

[Christopher7]

Did you make a typo or did you deliberately change your question?

No, it's the same question.

 

[Pardalis]

No, it's the same question.

That's the problem. It isn't.

In your twisted mentally challenged mind it is, but for any rational person there's a clear difference.

Goodbye.

 

[Christopher7]

Which one? Now there seems to be two of them.

Can you admit that WTC7 looks like a CD?

 

[Christopher7]

That's the problem. It isn't.

In your twisted mentally challenged mind it is, but for any rational person there's a clear difference.

Goodbye.

Having run out of diversionary talking points, and unwilling to admit that the implosion of WTC7 looks like a CD, Pardalis departs, with the ubiquitous insult.

Fair thee well

 

[Pardalis]

Can you admit that the implosion of WTC7 was cd?

Can you admit that WTC7 looks like a CD?

To you that's the same question?

 

[Christopher7]

Clearly, you're wrong:
Source

Clearly, i was right.
Hayden's quote is from another source.

 

[Christopher7]

Christopher7: Can you find a single example of a CD- ever in the entire history of building demolitions- that was:

1) On fire for several hours before the collapse.
2) Was a high rise and feel top-down.
3) Was done by Firefighters.
4) Did not have any tell-tale explosive sounds.

Happy hunting.

No

 

[Christopher7]

Oh, and I almost forgot:

5) LEFT ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER OF A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION

I'd really like you to find an example for #5- that would be a hoot.

Can you admit that the implosion of WTC7 looks like a CD?

 

[Corsair 115]

Can you admit that WTC7 looks like a CD?

What difference does that make? Just because one thing looks like another doesn't make that thing the other thing.

You're going to need a hell of a lot more substantive evidence than some supposed visual similarity to prove controlled demolition.