jeeze where do I begin. First off. Your air tight elevators
Where do the counterweights and cable loops go when an elevator rises? out the side of the building? Or alongside the elevator in the same shaft? Did you know that the weight of the cable alone if not compensated for in bypassed loop slings of counterweights that the elevator cab when rising toward the top would rocket out the top of the shaft from the weight of the cable slack if not compensated for?
secondly.. your "scale model" fallacy
Troofers fail to grasp the problem of scale.
Lets dumb this down to child level physics, take the insect analogy. An ant if scaled up to human size would not be able to lift its limbs let alone five times its body weight.
The scaling problem of fire
Combustion in a small box does not behave in the same manner as combustion in a large room. This problem can be demonstrated as simply as lighting a match to a half O model train scale balsa wood house. compare the flame pattern and size to that of full scale house fires which I am certain everyone has witnessed.
I find it laughable when troofers claim the collapse violates physics when there they go building hardware cloth and construction paper models in attempts to demonstrate something they cannot understand. The only thing they demonstrate is that they know nothing of everyday common laymen level physics. There is a segment of the general population who simply cannot visualize things. In my field I bring blueprints to some people who cannot grasp or see elevations that are before them on paper. Its like if you showed them a photo of their uncle Ed and they didn't recognize him until he walked in the door.
