Split Thread WTC7 collapse (again) - split from: How did you rule out that 911 was an insid

[Alferd_Packer]

He saw a video edited to take out information that might lead him to believe that it was not a controlled demolition.

Is that not being misled?

 

[Corsair 115]

Silly official conspiracy theorist thinks that WTC was not full of Enron document and such.

Might you explain how blowing up a building is a more certain way of destroying documents than using a paper shredder?

 

[Alferd_Packer]

Might you explain how blowing up a building is a more certain way of destroying documents than using a paper shredder?

Duh, they couldn't use the paper shredder because there was a power down!!!

 

[Dr Harry Rein]

Silly official conspiracy theorist thinks that WTC was not full of Enron document and such.

You have evidence that WTC7 was filled with Enron documents?

That was the only place where Enron documents were stored? There were no backup copies anyplace.

Silly troofers think that WTC7 was not full of invisible angry elephants that caused the building to collapse, then flew away.

Prove me wrong...

 

[Zlaya]

How can a building be incinerated and destroyed and still standing?

I'm still reading about this event, i have not made up my mind about anything yet.

 

[Zlaya]

Ohhh, that evil Jeffery Skilling. And let's not forget his brother is active in weather control programs for the NWO.

I see how you are. Don't worry, everyone gets what's coming to them.

 

[Zlaya]

Might you explain how blowing up a building is a more certain way of destroying documents than using a paper shredder?

How many people do you think have heard about WTC7 collapse, and how many do you think even care?

This was a perfect moment to destroy any evidence, the whole country was in chaos, so what's the difference if one more building falls right?

Claiming that using 'shredder' would somehow be more logical, makes no sense, since the plane attacks, pentagon damage, flight 93, and building collapses causes such a shock that the PNAC boys could have gotten anything they wanted done at that moment. You know Lay is very close to the PNAC boys? Poor Lay...

And they did get everything they wanted right, thanks to people like Gravy, and you, no?

 

[Arus808]

holy dang, apples and oranges batman/

zlaya, the first thing you should do is acquaint yourself with how the WTC towers were built.

then maybe you'll stop comparing them to buildings that didn't have the same type of construction as the towers.

 

[Earthborn]

He saw a video edited to take out information that might lead him to believe that it was not a controlled demolition.

Is that not being misled?

Was he deliberately shown a video that was deliberately edited to take out all the information that might lead him to believe it was not a controlled demolition? What do you think the makers of the programme did, ask another demolition expert to watch the video and point out the sections that might cause a demolition expert to conclude that it wasn't controlled demolition and that purposefully edit those parts out to purposefully mislead Jowenko? That's a conspiracy theory right there!

 

[Arus808]

Was he deliberately shown a video that was deliberately edited to take out all the information that might lead him to believe it was not a controlled demolition?

he was shown a video that only showed ONE side of the collapse (the one that didn't show the bottom of the building collapsing) and he was told that the building contained various government offices, and papers dealing with Enron.

Dont know how you can ask that question, since the video showing the truthers showing Jawenko the collapse of wtc 7 is pretty straight forward.

 

[Garb]

How many people do you think have heard about WTC7 collapse, and how many do you think even care?

This was a perfect moment to destroy any evidence, the whole country was in chaos, so what's the difference if one more building falls right?

Claiming that using 'shredder' would somehow be more logical, makes no sense, since the plane attacks, pentagon damage, flight 93, and building collapses causes such a shock that the PNAC boys could have gotten anything they wanted done at that moment. You know Lay is very close to the PNAC boys? Poor Lay...

And they did get everything they wanted right, thanks to people like Gravy, and you, no?

So basically blow up a building just cause they can? Wonderul logic you have there.

 

[Zlaya]

So basically blow up a building just cause they can? Wonderul logic you have there.

Powers that be do everything just because they can. Do you think you have any saying in the matter?

 

[beachnut]

Comedy Central try outs! Zlaya and the PNAC Boys

Powers that be do everything just because they can. Do you think you have any saying in the matter?

Give some examples, with proof of buildings blown up by powers that be in the US that killed people. Solid proof not Fetzer "say so crap".

Sources, examples and yes, I do have a say in the matter.

PNAC boys

Please name all the PNAC boys and list their assets and armies they control. With sources please. (please leave out Dick's shot gun, his wife took it away)

 

[Earthborn]

he was shown a video that only showed ONE side of the collapse (the one that didn't show the bottom of the building collapsing)

Correct. But that does not prove he was deliberately mislead, only that he was rather quick to come up with a conclusion after the first video he was shown.

and he was told that the building contained various government offices, and papers dealing with Enron.

Not during the interview.

Dont know how you can ask that question, since the video showing the truthers showing Jawenko the collapse of wtc 7 is pretty straight forward.

Truthers did not show Jowenko the collapse of WTC7. Journalists trying to disprove truther claims did.

 

[technoextreme]

Yes WTC5 was a mess wasn't it?

BUT!

It didn't collapse!

MM

Yes it did. Dum dum dummmmmm. In fact I asked this same question before. Why do people ignore the WTC 5 collapse? I guess now I know part of the reason why is that people can't even get their facts straight. Cherry picking of facts that only support their argument and completly ignoring anything else that contradicts their insular view. WTC 5 is the perfect example of what fire does to steel. Pictures show that even though the fire was not hot enough to melt steel the girders were twisted around like pretzels.

 

[twinstead]

Yes it did. Dum dum dummmmmm. In fact I asked this same question before. Why do people ignore the WTC 5 collapse? I guess now I know part of the reason why is that they can't even get their facts straight.

Did I just read that MM said that WTC5 DIDN'T collapse?

For crying out loud that's a pretty bad error. It did indeed collapse, but I suppose there wasn't any NWO bunker in it so truthers ignore it.

 

[jhunter1163]

Where's that pic of someone walking around ankle-deep in papers after one of the Towers collapsed? It seems blowing up a building isn't a very efficient means of destroying documents.

 

[stateofgrace]

Silly official conspiracy theorist thinks that WTC was not full of Enron document and such.

Really?

I guess removing these “Enron documents and such” the night before was too easy, eh?

I guess also that these ever so important “Enron documents and such “were not backed up anywhere else, eh?

 

[twinstead]

Where's that pic of someone walking around ankle-deep in papers after one of the Towers collapsed? It seems blowing up a building isn't a very efficient means of destroying documents.

Well, yea, but shredding is SOOO boring.

 

[technoextreme]

Did I just read that MM said that WTC5 DIDN'T collapse?

For crying out loud that's a pretty bad error. It did indeed collapse, but I suppose there wasn't any NWO bunker in it so truthers ignore it.

Localized collapses. And even if it didn't collapse it still proves my point. An office fire can wreck havoc on steel beams. It won't melt it but it will turn said beams into a pretzel.