• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Former Italian President says 911 inside job

Astute Perspicuous said:
There should be an anon fund set up where the public can donate ANY level of money with NO LIMITS on amounts. It should be kept PRIVATE and those who donate should be kept SECRET to protect their identity so they do not aquire any backlash. The donors also have NO EXTRA SAY in how the investigation is run.
Click to expand...

And who would manage this fund? If "The Bankers" are so entrenched, how will you keep them out?

Who would decide on the investigators? You say "Americans", but you'd be hard-pressed to get them all in a room to vote.
 
annexw said:
And who would manage this fund? If "The Bankers" are so entrenched, how will you keep them out?

Who would decide on the investigators? You say "Americans", but you'd be hard-pressed to get them all in a room to vote.
Click to expand...

I never said I have all the answers...There would have to be some group that manages the funds.

As for the Americans who pick the investigators...you make it like Jury duty where if you're selected to be on a panel to pick the investigators, you are obligated to do so.
 
Last edited:
someone has to access the money to put it to use. Who would that be...who would decide who that would be? Who would his assistants be (cause you know he/she has to have them...lol)?

Far fetched fairytale pipe dreams with no basis in reality.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
someone has to access the money to put it to use. Who would that be...who would decide who that would be? Who would his assistants be (cause you know he/she has to have them...lol)?

Far fetched fairytale pipe dreams with no basis in reality.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Yup...With people like yourself with that "Can't Do" attitude, I guess you're most likely right. It will never get done.
 
scissorhands said:
Probably not,the only other image I can find of this is at... http://www.flickr.com/photos/55281377@N00/102925932

Photographer is Hayden Roger Celestin.

shows no sign of photoshopping but is identical.

This one has been through photoshop, but only to add credits for photographer and information as to the event.

Still, it shows the desperation of the truth movement, having to rely on infiltrating a large march, sticking up a few flags and proclaiming it as some kind of evidence of mass support.
Click to expand...
I was in that march. If there were any 9/11 denier signs near me, I didn't notice them. Then again, I was next to the topless chicks for much of the march.
 
Astute Perspicuous said:
Yup...With people like yourself with that "Can't Do" attitude, I guess you're most likely right. It will never get done.
Click to expand...
It's the truth movement that has the can't do attitude. Jimmy Walter says he spent $5 million calling for a new investigation. Imagine the investigating that could have been done with that money!

Ask yourself why, if the truth movement has millions of supporters, they can't exert political pressure for this new investigation, and they refuse to fund one themselves.

It's nearly 2008, and you have nothing but utterly incompetent leaders, and none of you has written a single paper that could pass peer review in a reputable engineering journal.

What the hell are you armchair revolutionaries waiting for, "Astute?"?

87904670cd1dc0fcb.jpg
 
Last edited:
Architect said:
You mean agent 003459?

He's a bloke, you know.
Click to expand...
Nuh-uh! While ogling one of them, I realized that I knew her. Later she showed up, clothed, at the bar where I was drinking. It was a bit awkward, at least for me.
 
Last edited:
Astute Perspicuous said:
I never said I have all the answers...There would have to be some group that manages the funds.

As for the Americans who pick the investigators...you make it like Jury duty where if you're selected to be on a panel to pick the investigators, you are obligated to do so.
Click to expand...

Regardless of whether they are halfway competent investigators or not?
Ah,truther logic.
 
Gravy said:
Nuh-uh! While ogling one of them, I realized that I knew her. Later she showed up, clothed, at the bar where I was drinking. It was a bit awkward, at least for me.
Click to expand...


I remember one of the lads doing that to a girl who turned out to be the wee sister of one of the other blokes. Talk about a laugh, as we watched the two of them almost come to blows whilst flitching their beer....

Those were the days.

:D
 
Gravy said:
Nuh-uh! While ogling one of them, I realized that I knew her. Later she showed up, clothed, at the bar where I was drinking. It was a bit awkward, at least for me.
Click to expand...

Oh... that rules!!!
 
dudalb said:
Regardless of whether they are halfway competent investigators or not?
Ah,truther logic.
Click to expand...


Nothing like "twisting" it into something it's not. It's obvious (to those with a brain) that the panel would pick the investigators based on experience and a vote would be in order.

Does everything need to be spelled out in such simple terms for you to understand? If so, please let me know and I will gladly cater to your inability to reason.
 
Astute Perspicuous said:
Nothing like "twisting" it into something it's not. It's obvious (to those with a brain) that the panel would pick the investigators based on experience and a vote would be in order.
Click to expand...

What technical qualifications do you consider necessary?
 
Astute Perspicuous said:
Once again...you are putting the burdon of proof on a person, rather than the COURTS.

That's what a real investigation is for...You have no idea if he can "prove" it or not.
Click to expand...


Oh, awesome... the ol' "prove you're not a child molester" triple back-flip (or, in this case, "have a third-party prove you're not a child molester").

Various organizations, both government and independent, have done investigations into 9/11 appropriate to their field. They have released their findings, and the evidence they've used to come to their conclusions, in various forms. The whole of these conclusions constitutes the "official story" of 9/11.

You, and your movement, have made an insanely vague statement that "it's all a lie". It is now up to you to provide the evidence for why this is so.

It's been 6 years. Are you going to wait 6 more?
 
Last edited:
Astute Perspicuous said:
There should be an anon fund set up where the public can donate ANY level of money with NO LIMITS on amounts. It should be kept PRIVATE and those who donate should be kept SECRET to protect their identity so they do not aquire any backlash. The donors also have NO EXTRA SAY in how the investigation is run.
Click to expand...

Astute Perspicuous said:
I never said I have all the answers...There would have to be some group that manages the funds.

As for the Americans who pick the investigators...you make it like Jury duty where if you're selected to be on a panel to pick the investigators, you are obligated to do so.
Click to expand...

What I'm looking for is an investigation set-up that won't be dismissed by twoofers if it returned a verdict you didn't like.

Thus far, what I've heard from you is: highly qualified experts should be chosen by...umm...someone, and these experts will then be funded by...ah, people...who donate money anonymously...a process that will be overseen by someone else....and the money will be managed by...umm, some other people.

You'll have to do better in order for this investigation to get off the ground.
 
Astute, have you read the 9/11 Commission report? If so, what flaws do you believe are in it?
If you haven't read it, why not?
 
scissorhands said:
Probably not,the only other image I can find of this is at... http://www.flickr.com/photos/55281377@N00/102925932

Photographer is Hayden Roger Celestin.

shows no sign of photoshopping but is identical.

This one has been through photoshop, but only to add credits for photographer and information as to the event.

Still, it shows the desperation of the truth movement, having to rely on infiltrating a large march, sticking up a few flags and proclaiming it as some kind of evidence of mass support.
Click to expand...

Check this one out. Looks like an identical angle and location, but no 911 hoo ha. Came from here: http://www.dhadm.com/content/category/the-war-on-terror/

Have been trying to find a higher resolution one, but no luck yet.
 

Attachments

  • war-protest.jpg
    war-protest.jpg
    48 KB · Views: 24
Since when did it become OUR job to provide "evidence"?

All we are trying to say is that the "official" story is a complete hoax and a "real" investigation is needed.

That is the purpose of a "real" investigation and not the whitewash that was carried out before.
Click to expand...

GOVERNMENT SHILL!!

There is no possible way that you are in the 9/11 truth movement (okay, maybe one...). You're just attempting to make it look even worse than it was before.

Nothing like "twisting" it into something it's not. It's obvious (to those with a brain) that the panel would pick the investigators based on experience and a vote would be in order.

Does everything need to be spelled out in such simple terms for you to understand? If so, please let me know and I will gladly cater to your inability to reason.
Click to expand...

See, here you go again. You obviously believe that this panel would logically pick from the thousands of structural engineers whose views are most applicable to this matter, and they would debunk 9/11 Truth. So you're dooming the truth investigation from the start. SHILL!

-Sporanox
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom