Truthers: Explain, once and for all, who exactly "THEY" are

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Will you stop with the quibbling, equivocation and petty semantic games MM.

Put up or shut up.

He can't. He desperately wants members of this forum to be part of some grand NWO plot, but he has not evidence and knows that if he names names w/o being able to substantiate it then he'll be subjet to violations of the MA. So much easier just to make innuendo laced comments and appear smug then it is to actually stand up for something.

 

[DGM]

I'm quite willing to discuss the subject of this thread in a civil manner and in obedience to the JREF rules if you can show me how?

MM

Why not start with the ones that are not members here? That will not violate the MA.

 

[Miragememories]

Got a question though--

Can you point out where a post here has been modded for the evidence it contains? I was under the impression that posts get modded for personal attacks and other rule-breaking stuff.

If you can find a rule that says we have to agree with your evidence for the post to remain, point it out by all means.

Or, if you still think moderators will eliminate your message... come to www.skepticalcommunity.com and post your thoughts on the identity of "they", on an unmoderated board.

Yeah gnome I was under that same impression...go figure.

Your quite right of course, I have no evidence of moderators reacting to evidence.

I do have many situations where they have chosen to side with reports accusing me of personal attacks and thus editing or deleting my posts.

If my language appears to be overly cautious it's because I'm attempting to avoid censure from the moderators.

Don't get me wrong, I know the moderators/administrators have a difficult job.

BUT

They are human.

Oh I have no wish to join another forum..especially an unmoderated one where I'm nothing more than a 'lamb to the slaughter'.

MM

 

[Miragememories]

Will you stop with the quibbling, equivocation and petty semantic games MM.

Put up or shut up.

Obviously you don't take my words seriously.

Address these point in the Loose Change Forum if you really want a serious discussion.

They won't censure you there unless you act like a pig.

Look at e^n he's survived for over 2,000 posts and he hasn't been banned. He knows how to behave himself within the understanding of the Loose Change forum.

MM

 

[Slayhamlet]

Why are you guys abiding and encouraging the boasts of a deranged internet persona? That's providing exactly what this sort of person thrives on. It is healthy neither for you nor him. Please consider the virtues of the ignore function.

 

[Miragememories]

He can't. He desperately wants members of this forum to be part of some grand NWO plot, but he has not evidence and knows that if he names names w/o being able to substantiate it then he'll be subjet to violations of the MA. So much easier just to make innuendo laced comments and appear smug then it is to actually stand up for something.

Can't?

What language do you speak Arkan_Wolfshade?

I've explained why, in effect, the subject of this thread is impossible to reply to.

The moderators will not permit a response that effectively attacks a JREF member..well unless it's me.

Yes I think 9/11 was an inside job and yes I think there members here who are affiliated with those responsible for 9/11.

Without naming names, I suggest you take a good look at your de facto leader!

MM

 

[Brainache]

MM, are you seriously suggesting that some members of this forum are part of the secret all-powerful cabal of evil which covertly shapes the destiny of all humanity?

Really?

 

[Miragememories]

Why are you guys abiding and encouraging the boasts of a deranged internet persona? That's providing exactly what this sort of person thrives on. It is healthy neither for you nor him. Please consider the virtues of the ignore function.

One might ask why you aren't considering the virtues of the ignore function Slayhamlet?

If you wish to enter the fray go ahead.

What makes you think I'm deranged other than your own prejudice?

If you want to know the basis of who I am and need to see some substantiation for my attitude, I suggest you visit the Loose Change Forum.

I can assure you, I don't spend much time in this comic book forum.

MM

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Can't?

What language do you speak Arkan_Wolfshade?

I've explained why, in effect, the subject of this thread is impossible to reply to.

The moderators will not permit a response that effectively attacks a JREF member..well unless it's me.

Yes I think 9/11 was an inside job and yes I think there members here who are affiliated with those responsible for 9/11.

Without naming names, I suggest you take a good look at your de facto leader!

MM

Yes, "can't". Either you have evidence that would make Woodward's and Bernstein's investigation look like the local news interest story and you are too much of a coward to take it to anyone that can act on it (highly unlikely), or you're a cowardly drama queen that has so little belief in your own delusions that you'd rather tapdance and make innuendos as an, to borrow a phrase from Slashdot.org, anonymous coward.

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

. . .
I can assure you, I don't spend much time in this comic book forum.

MM

You really should consider spending even less.

 

[Miragememories]

MM, are you seriously suggesting that some members of this forum are part of the secret all-powerful cabal of evil which covertly shapes the destiny of all humanity?

Really?

Nah.

The upper echelons wouldn't involve themselves at this level.

Make the cogs small enough and they have no idea how big the machine is that they support.

MM

 

[Hyperviolet]

yes I think there members here who are affiliated with those responsible for 9/11.

............




Oh, my.

 

[Brainache]

Nah.

The upper echelons wouldn't involve themselves at this level.

Make the cogs small enough and they have no idea how big the machine is that they support.

MM

Well then, there shouldn't be any problems if you name them...

 

[Elizabeth I]

Nah.

The upper echelons wouldn't involve themselves at this level.

Make the cogs small enough and they have no idea how big the machine is that they support.

MM

ETA: You're joking, right?

 

[Miragememories]

You really should consider spending even less.

I won't bother responding to your All The President's Men post since you weren't really expecting a reply anyway.

Regarding how I spend my time.

Well maybe you should rethink how you spend your time Arkan_Wolfshade?

I know it's a nice club atmosphere here for those who "toe the line" but wouldn't you rather end up on the side that was right rather than the side that was loud?

MM

 

[JimBenArm]

I won't bother responding to your All The President's Men post since you weren't really expecting a reply anyway.

Regarding how I spend my time.

Well maybe you should rethink how you spend your time Arkan_Wolfshade?

I know it's a nice club atmosphere here for those who "toe the line" but wouldn't you rather end up on the side that was right rather than the side that was loud?

MM

I'd rather be here, than on the side that's paranoid and stupid. But hey, that's just me.
So, you ever going to grow a pair, quit this pathetic tap dance, and actually name some names? Just be sure to include me in there, m'kay?

 

[Miragememories]

Well then, there shouldn't be any problems if you name them...

Unless you haven't a clue about the hierarchy here, I have named a name.

You figure out who I consider your leader to be.

And don't kid yourself.

If I'm right that 9/11 was an inside job, then those responsible will certainly be doing damage control.

Do you want to be played for a sucker or do you want to think for yourself?

Yes I could be an idiot "troofer' but unless you have absolute proof, you might just discover you are the idiot skeptic!

MM

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

. . .
I know it's a nice club atmosphere here for those who "toe the line" but wouldn't you rather end up on the side that was right rather than the side that was loud?

MM

Indeed I would, which is why I join others in discussion of critical thinking; rather than joining with irrationalists like Alex Jones yapping on their bullhorns.

 

[Hyperviolet]

but wouldn't you rather end up on the side that was right rather than the side that was loud?

MM

That's correct, MM.
But, uhhhhh...

Isn't it you guys who are shouting:
"9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!"

The ones chanting:
"9/11 WAS A CFR JOB!!"

With your loudmouth shock-jock leader:

?

 

[Miragememories]

I'd rather be here, than on the side that's paranoid and stupid. But hey, that's just me.
So, you ever going to grow a pair, quit this pathetic tap dance, and actually name some names? Just be sure to include me in there, m'kay?

Careful JimBenArm the women amongst us might be offended by that remark.

Actually don't you think it's rather lame to use the old "cajones" thing to get a rise out of your adversary?

I mean really man that is so pathetiic.

I've named a name as tactfully and subtlely as I can without arousing the censure of the administrators.

MM