Ought there be a "Slaughter Rule" in debunking?

NIST is up at the plate:

"We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse."

Swing and a misssssssss....
 
Next up, FEMA

"the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence."

It seems as no one can hit the WTC 7 "cutter."
 
9-11 Troof up to bat now.

Here's the stretch...and the pitch...

Provide any evidence of the puported inside job...
Click to expand...

OHHHHhh--Strike 27! They've used all of their outs for the whole game in one at-bat!

What monumental fail! Unbelievable!
 
Last edited:
RedIbis said:
Next up, FEMA

"the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence."

It seems as no one can hit the WTC 7 "cutter."
Click to expand...

That was an error on your part, all runners advance and Gumboot comes home.

(Hint, you seem to lack the basic idea that it is dishonest to cherry-pick quotes totally without context to prove a point you already know to be wrong.)
 
Has anyone mentioned yet that the problem with having a slaughter rule in debunking is that the people you are debunking won't take any notice.

They are like the Black Knight from Monty Python and the Holy Grail

" Oh, oh I see. Running away, eh?! You yellow [censored]! Come back here and take what's coming to you! I'LL BITE YOUR LEGS OFF!"
 
It's kind of hard to hit a pitch when the pitcher spends 47 hours telling you about how bad you will look when he strikes you out, but refuses to actually throw the damn ball!
 
BenBurch said:
That was an error on your part, all runners advance and Gumboot comes home.

(Hint, you seem to lack the basic idea that it is dishonest to cherry-pick quotes totally without context to prove a point you already know to be wrong.)
Click to expand...

Oh, so FEMA knows what caused the collapse of WTC 7? NIST hasn't told us, Lee Hamilton admits it's an unresolved issue, so where's the theory on 7, the unhittable pitch?
 
RedIbis said:
Oh, so FEMA knows what caused the collapse of WTC 7? NIST hasn't told us, Lee Hamilton admits it's an unresolved issue, so where's the theory on 7, the unhittable pitch?
Click to expand...

You expect me to tell you what an investigation is going to reveal before its done???

That's the Modus Operandi of you "Truth" frauds!

I'm content to wait until all of the engineering has been done, but I can understand how your side wants to have the conclusions FIRST, as your evidence is 100% dishonest.
 
BenBurch said:
You expect me to tell you what an investigation is going to reveal before its done???

That's the Modus Operandi of you "Truth" frauds!

I'm content to wait until all of the engineering has been done, but I can understand how your side wants to have the conclusions FIRST, as your evidence is 100% dishonest.
Click to expand...

You mean WTC 7 hasn't been debunked, hit out of the park? I thought it was 15-0 in the fifth and time to call the mercy rule? I thought Gravy laid all conspiracy theories to waste and he was going to give us the "facts."

The most honest of skeptics will admit that WTC 7 experienced several phenomena that cannot be explained simply by debris damage and diesel fuel.
 
The most honest of skeptics
Click to expand...

Like who?

will admit that WTC 7 experienced several phenomena that cannot be explained simply by debris damage and diesel fuel.
Click to expand...

I see. But imaginary controlled demolitions that nobody can seem to prove existed explain everything.

Strike 28. Yer out.
 
The game was over months ago. The score remains a million to zero. RedIbis is still trying to convince people that the umpires were biased and the win should have gone to Team Truther.
 
chipmunk stew said:
The game was over months ago. The score remains a million to zero. RedIbis is still trying to convince people that the umpires were biased and the win should have gone to Team Truther.
Click to expand...

Really? Where have I said anything even remotely close? I am far more objective and reasoned to think I've "won" anything. The closeminded here believe they have won an argument simply because explanations have been given.

Debunking is the business of providing plausible explanations, regardless of whether or not they are true.

You guys still can't hit the nasty WTC 7 cutter.
 
Debunking is the business of providing plausible explanations
Click to expand...

Right. You know nothing about it.

...regardless of whether or not they are true.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but I think that's called Trooferism.

you haven't even swung at the thermite knuckler. Or the CD slider...
Click to expand...

Well, he can't swing, seeing that he struck out 27 times in one at bat and lost the game single-handedly. He couldn't hit the "Provide evidence" floating change-up, even though he just kept swinging and swinging.

Keep swinging for those bleachers, Red. Maybe you'll give the outfielder a cold.
 
Last edited:
RedIbis said:
But on another team Jim Hoffman is the closer and he'll throw that wicked cutter, the WTC 7, which I haven't seen anyone touch.
Click to expand...

Hoffman sits in the dugout all day and talks about what a great player he is, his fellow players tell the same story. The one time he actually played he made 4 errors and struck out every time he was up, and that was years ago.

Griffin's a solid fielder, known to make an error once in a while, but his scrappy play makes him a reliable fielder.
Click to expand...

Griffin can field the ball, but then he invariably throws it into the stands. He also complains that the other team should be called for being 'offisdes' or 'icing'. At one game he showed up on a steel plated motorcycle.

Alex Jones is all power hitter, either a home run or a strike out.
Click to expand...

Alex Jones has never managed to hit the ball in his life. When he swings the bat he spins several times and makes the catcher and umpire jump out of the way of his flailing. He also tries to get other people to charge the mound when the pitcher throws a strike.

Steven Jones, the wily knuckleballer, you think it's easy to hit, but it proves elusive.
Click to expand...

Jones throws the ball at the ground so that it bounces four times and barely makes it to the plate, not that it would have made it to the plate had he thrown it straight: To impress people, he once had his pitch measured with radar, but had to give the figure as millimeters per hour to make the numbers seem bigger. More often Jones just tries to palm the ball as if he were trying to fool a dog, then complains that the ref didn't call a strike.

The cheerleaders are also clumsy and ugly as well.
 
kookbreaker said:
The cheerleaders are also clumsy and ugly as well.
Click to expand...

Au contraire,



Hottruthers.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom