Fascist America, in 10 easy steps

[jsfisher]

I maintain my kid innocence.

Ok, but since you admit you are out of touch with reality, why should we pay attention to your histrionics?

 

[Ion]

I am not "...out of touch with reality...".

You are.

 

[Pardalis]

I maintain my kid innocence.

I am not.

You are.

I see you retained the rhetoric as well.

 

[Ion]

I see you retained the rhetoric as well.

You see in reality that you troll about a "...loon..." whom you cannot substantiate.

 

[Pardalis]

You see that you troll about a "...loon..." which you cannot substantiate.

Everytime you post you prove my point. Relax.

 

[Ion]

I am not "...out of touch with reality...".

You are.

I was cut off.

The entire post there is that kids maintain their innocence.

I maintain my innocence like a kid.

Adults like you jsfisher are corrupt.

Take for instance your "...since you admit that you are out of touch with reality...":

you are corrupt because I admitted that I have innocence and integrity in touch with the reality more than you do, not the opposite;
you fake the opposite of what I said, when you try to put words in my mouth in "...since you admit...".

There is not one single post by you in this thread that I didn't counter, often with data, after which you retreated.

 

[Ion]

Everytime you post you prove my point. Relax.

But when prompted about your points (the "...loon..." and evidence, the fake complaint about editing posts which you won't submit to administrators here to show that you are genuine instead of trolling, and more), you run away from your assertions without supporting evidence, like in hit and run, the mark of a troll.

In contrast to you, what did I just prove?

I did prove that you troll.

Now relax, and take a hike to a religious right wing forum, will you?

 

[jsfisher]

I was cut off.

The entire post there is that kids maintain their innocence.

I maintain my innocence like a kid.

Adults like you jsfisher are corrupt.

Take for instance your "...since you admit...":

you are corrupt because I admit that I have innocence and integrity more than you, not the opposite which you fake in "...since you admit...".

That's an interesting grasp on language you have there. You describe yourself has having childlike innocence, a term that means you are shielded from some of the less pleasant aspects of reality. Yet, you believe that translates to integrity. Fascinating.

Be that as it may, exactly what point are you trying to make?

There is not one single post by you in this thread that I didn't counter, often with data, after which you retreated.

If by "counter, often with data" you mean taunted with incivility and grammatical errors, then yes. Otherwise, you merely flatter yourself.

 

[Ion]

That's an interesting grasp on language you have there. You describe yourself has having childlike innocence, a term that means you are shielded from some of the less pleasant aspects of reality. Yet, you believe that translates to integrity. Fascinating.
...

You mean that you are not overweight and wronged by my data?

Prove it.

...
Be that as it may, exactly what point are you trying to make?



If by "counter, often with data" you mean taunted with incivility and grammatical errors, then yes. Otherwise, you merely flatter yourself.

I taunted you with analytical skills that you don't have.

You never stood my data.

Prove me wrong, counter my data with counter-data if you can.

As for my "...grammatical errors..." in English, beyond your own grammatical errors in your native language (shades of the all-American pot calls kettle back), why don't you expand your capabilities to foreign languages and analytical skills taught in mathematics?

You sorely need these in modern life, because the work that I am brought to do in U.S. displaces you from U.S. as we speak now.

Ah, corruption and extinction of the local sub-humans, I see...

 

[jsfisher]

Are you done editing your post? I don't want to respond before your done.

...personal attacks skipped...
Prove me wrong if you can.

Ok, you said:

I maintain my innocence like a kid.

According to Webster, innocence has simplicity and ignorance as synonyms. I don't see any meaning that connects to integrity. Perhaps you see something there I missed. Or, more likely, you are proven wrong.

You sorely need these in life because the work that I am brought to do displaces you from U.S. as we speak.

Whatever did you mean by this sentence?

 

[jsfisher]

Are you done editing your post? I don't want to respond before your done.

Nope, he's still at it.

 

[Ion]

Nope, he's still at it.

Because it's considered valid.

If you have a problem complain to the administrators.

But you only troll.

So you won't complain to the administrators.

 

[Ion]

...
According to Webster, innocence has simplicity and ignorance as synonyms. I don't see any meaning that connects to integrity. Perhaps you see something there I missed. Or, more likely, you are proven wrong.




Whatever did you mean by this sentence?

Get an education beyond Webster.

A real one.

One that teaches you that innocence is honesty.

 

[jsfisher]

Get an education beyond Webster.

A real one.

One that teaches you that innocence is honesty.

Your claim, so where is your evidence?

 

[Ion]

...
Whatever did you mean by this sentence?

I mean that the U.S. Department of Labor considers me skilled.

But the unskilled they go poorer and poorer in Capitalism, until they don't have money for life and become extinct.

 

[Ion]

Your claim, so where is your evidence?

In my dictionary.

Also in this link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innocence

It starts with:

"Innocence is a term that describes the lack of guilt of an individual, with respect to a crime..."

Ah, teaching the native language to a native speaker.
Pot calls kettle back applies here.

A native speaker without a real education in his native country.

And for him this is even not as high as foreign languages, and mathematics...

 

[jsfisher]

I mean that the U.S. Department of Labor considers me skilled and you unskilled.

The unskilled they go poorer and poorer in Capitalism, until they don't have money for life and become extinct.

Upon what basis do you claim I am considered "unskilled" by the US Department of Labor?

 

[jsfisher]

In my dictionary.

Also in this link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innocence

It starts with:

"Innocence is a term that describes the lack of guilt of an individual, with respect to a crime..."

Ah, teaching his native language to a native speaker.
Pot calls kettle back applies here.

A native speaker without a real education in his native country.

And for him this is even not as high as foreign languages, and mathematics...

What has that to do with your claim?

 

[Texas]

That list reminds me very much of Scott Peck's list (q.v. The Road Less Travelled guy) that defined an "authoritarian" political structure--something like one person at the top, subdued criticism only allowable, claims of infallibility, stuff like that--and then went on in the book to explain that this was the definition of the Roman Catholic Church.

.

That said, there definitely seems to be a more rigid structure in American politics that tends to marginalise opposition. But the fact is that American electors don't vote in droves (as they say they did in Iraq, for example) because they don't actually care who runs the country as long as their better interests are served. Women's and minority rights are guaranteed there in a way that would make a Saudi prince or a Chinese bureaucrat shiver in contempt.

I maintain to this day that most of the criticism leveled against the USA is borne of jealousy that they have been so successful and not because they are innately "fascist" or exclusive. It's the same as I see Scott Peck's partisan Protestantism against the Roman Catholic Church. Success begs, somehow, an unrealistic comparison to Hitler.

It appears that Wolfe has taken a page from the John Birch Society playbook by replacing the left's boogie man, Fascists, with the JBS boogie man, the Reds. This scary" call to arms from the far right has been around for 50 years and is almost a mirror image of Wolfe's screed http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html

 

[Ion]

What has that to do with your claim?

From the innocence in wikipedia, namely from:

"Innocence is a term that describes the lack of guilt of an individual, with respect to a crime..."

this:

...
The entire post there is that kids maintain their innocence.

I maintain my innocence like a kid.

Adults like you jsfisher are corrupt.
...

applies in the sense that:

.) innocence is a term that describes the lack of guilt of a kid and the lack of guilt by me, with respect to a crime, like the war in Iraq by Fascist America;

.) jsfisher is not innocent, he is corrupt with respect to a crime, like the war in Iraq by Fascist America.




Like I said, you struggle with analytical skills.

And on a more basic note, you struggle with your own native language, when you don't know what innocence means in your native language.
Pot calls kettle back applies here to you, again.