Who peer reviews Mark Roberts work?

Gravy said:
Hey, I've missed that name, although when my cat's begging for attention I sometimes say, "Who do you think you are, Violeta McWhifferkugel?" Good to see you back posting here, Conspi!
Click to expand...
Thank you sir! Had to return and mix it up. And who'd have thunk that out of the blue, in this particular thread, I'd be resting my mournful peepers on Her Royal Woolness, my ever-lovely Violeta McWhifferkugel? Fortune favors the foolish...
 
realcddeal said:
Mark, again you are simply saying things about me with no basis.

You spent more time with the above post than it would take you to cut and paste your questions into a letter to send GreNME.

Are you going to write a critique of my paper and send it to GreNME? Everybody is waiting for your answer.
Click to expand...

You do realise that Gravy has you on ignore, don't you?
 
SDC said:
If I recall correctly, you are a Cleveland fan, while I am a Detroit Taaaagers fan.

With respect to Baaaaaaaaaaaahs-ton vs Cleveland,

GO CLEVELAND! SMITE THE EVILDOERS!!
Click to expand...
We're up against it, concerning the Bosox. Maybe Carmona will pull off a victory today.

Ah, the Tigers. Hank Greenberg territory. Denny McLain. Norm Cash. The Bird. Bill Freehan. Dick McAuliffe. I remember in those long summer where all we did was play baseball - someone would always try to imitate his batting stance.
 
Guys, there's a whole Sports subforum for discussing the game. I don't know where you should take the discussion about Violetta McWhatever.....

however, please remember the membership agreement, and keep this thread on topic.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
ConspiRaider said:
We're up against it, concerning the Bosox. Maybe Carmona will pull off a victory today.

Ah, the Tigers. Hank Greenberg territory. Denny McLain. Norm Cash. The Bird. Bill Freehan. Dick McAuliffe. I remember in those long summer where all we did was play baseball - someone would always try to imitate his batting stance.
Click to expand...

Seriously, mate, can me and Hyper interest you in a real man's game? World Cup semi finals this weekend....
 
chillzero said:
Guys, there's a whole Sports subforum for discussing the game. I don't know where you should take the discussion about Violetta McWhatever.....

however, please remember the membership agreement, and keep this thread on topic.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
Click to expand...

Okay, but just to finish off the sheep jokes I recall the old Aberdeen version of the well known Rolling Stones song......Hey, MacLeod, get off my Ewe!


(boom boom)
 
realcddeal said:
You didn't provide a basis for your comments on my work. That is what I was asking you to do.

Mark Roberts has not supported his criticisms of me as of yet and it appears he is refusing to do so in a neutral venue.
Click to expand...


Mein' Ruhe ist hin... Sorry. It was the slivovitz.

I have no comments on your work except, By carbonate of soda! I don't trust your efforts while I do trust those of G.

This Mark Roberts fellow... Well, why should he, even if you are correct as regards to his refusal? Which I do not accept.

OK, look. Here is what Real Historians do. (Let me add: as of 9/12/01, when I had enough space to start to think, I regarded the events of 9/11/01 as a historical problem, as I was trained to do). We research, we write, we get rejected, we go ahead and find somewhere to publish, and when we don't get the respect we think we deserve, we cry on the shoulders of our... significant others...)

And so forth, but that leads us into the world of romance (can I just share one more moondance), and I don't want to share it with you. Sorry.
 
beachnut said:
Real, have you corrected your errors in your paper yet?

You still have the 600 mph stuff, and a bunch of political crap; the answer is NO.

Marks work is supported by facts, your work is hearsay; How can you debate hearsay vs facts? You would fail. Fix your paper first and then come back. Hurry.
Click to expand...

What does NIST say would have happened if the fireproofing hadn't been allegedly stripped off?

Does NIST make the statement that the February 3, 1964 white paper says a large commercial aircraft moving at 600 MPH?
 
realcddeal said:
Mark, again you are simply saying things about me with no basis.

You spent more time with the above post than it would take you to cut and paste your questions into a letter to send GreNME.

Are you going to write a critique of my paper and send it to GreNME? Everybody is waiting for your answer.
Click to expand...


If you are truly interested in a formal debate, I would recommend cutting and pasting the questions Gravy has already raised, first back in August, then again in this thread. You can send those off to GreNME with a formal response, and carry on from there. Since the questions have already been posted, why are you requiring Gravy to repost them?
 
chillzero said:
Guys, there's a whole Sports subforum for discussing the game. I don't know where you should take the discussion about Violetta McWhatever.....

however, please remember the membership agreement, and keep this thread on topic.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
Click to expand...

Sorry, Chill!

Blame Architect, he is far too enthusiatic. The man is sitting with onions round his neck, for Christ's sake.
 
realcddeal said:
You shouldn't presume what he is thinking. Let him answer for himself. He started the fight so don't jump in on his side and prove my point about his friends helping out.
Click to expand...

I appreciate your advice, but that is why after I said "I THINK", I added the letters IMHO (In My Honest Opinion). You are right, and I am not presuming, I am essentially guessing based on what I have read.

TAM:)
 
SDC:

From your comments I know you were not offended by what I said, but just for clarification, I in no way meant to belittle, or trivialize the work of historians, information organizers, or librarians. I was merely commenting on how the collection, and even analysis of multisourced, diverse data, is not amenable to the format of "Objectives, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion" as a scientific paper would be.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
SDC:

From your comments I know you were not offended by what I said, but just for clarification, I in no way meant to belittle, or trivialize the work of historians, information organizers, or librarians. I was merely commenting on how the collection, and even analysis of multisourced, diverse data, is not amenable to the format of "Objectives, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion" as a scientific paper would be.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Ach, you know, historians just want to have fun. So do librarians. If I understand correctly, you are an MD (or any Canadian equivalent). And let me say, if any MD wants to address my issues with pharmaceuticals, surgery, or examinations evaluating inspection of body parts...

Never mind. You said somewhere you have a 17 yr old daughter. I have a 15 year old daughter. HELP!!
 
realcddeal said:
What does NIST say would have happened if the fireproofing hadn't been allegedly stripped off?

Does NIST make the statement that the February 3, 1964 white paper says a large commercial aircraft moving at 600 MPH?
Click to expand...
NIST? I am using the chief engineer on the WTC and you have bogus information in your paper. Please, if you want to talk about NIST go to the NIST threads, but this is about facts, and you got them wrong and ignore real facts and use hearsay. Hearsay stuff is your paper, and you round it out with political junk.

BTW, repeating the junk from others you are trying to prove wrong, and using the errors they have, magnify your errors and prove you are not able to get the facts straight.
 
Last edited:
no, my daughter is 4.5 years old...lol

as for the rest...let me quote a famous TV MD...

Caller...I'm listening.

TAM:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom