The individual chooses whether they go to hell or not, God through his amazing grace just grants them their wish.
Like an abusive father who stands above his battered spouse and tells her she 'wanted it herself' as she clutches her blue eyes and broken hand. Bitch had it comin'.
Homosexuality is not genetically influenced and no scientific studies support such a contention. Homosexuality is an immoral lifestyle choice freely chosen by the individual.
This does not matter the least bit. Genetics and choice have little to do with morals and ethics.
No one has to be "gay" it is an identity they adopt for whatever reason. Many of them are posessed by demons and give into their disorded desires rather than finding Jesus who can set them free and make them whole in Christ. Homosexuality is nothing more than a behavior and an immoral one at that.
Since you demand proof of genetics, I assume you're going to prove to me that homosexuals are possessed by demons? And by this I mean actual proof, not 'you shall know them by their fruits'. You can't just make a claim and go 'oh, isn't it
obvious?!' when asked for evidence. I want actual proof.
Likewise with the mental disorder claim. I want evidence of chemical imbalances in the brain or some other sign of mental illness. Bring it.
Liberals hate true morality.
There is no such thing as true morality.
Rather than follow God's plan for humanity, [liberals] make up their own rules as they go along which fall far short of God's.
We all 'make up our own rules as we go along'. That's how morality works. What we believe to be right changes with time and is heavily affected by what society we live in. Had we lived in the fourties' USA, we'd both consider Africans inferior, because that's what everyone else did. I suggest reading
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, particularly the parts in which Finn grapples with horrible guilt for having committed the crime of freeing a slave. Outright thievery it was in those days, akin to stealing a dog today. And had you lived during that time, you'd have thought so, too.
Jesus wandered on foot from town to town extolling the virtues of giving money to the poor (aka welfare) while healing the sick for free (socialized healthcare). At the same time, he was stating that it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Sorry, Jesus was a liberal. Therefore you're views are amoral and heretical.
No, actually, I consider Jesus an early communist. I very clearly remember hearing a Biblical story in which He happened upon a field at which people had been working. The wicked landowner wanted to - imagine! - pay each person by how long he had worked, but was fortunately quickly corrected by the Lord, who made sure each person was paid equally. All that's missing is the plan economy and state ownership, but I think several churches and communities - Christian ones - implemented this after Jesus' time. All in his Red Commie spirit
.
I am not "homophobic". Homophobia is a made up term by homosexual activists to describe anyone that disagrees with their choice of lifestyle and their radical agenda. It is used to silence opposition. A phobia is a fear. I do not fear the "gays", I mearly oppose what they do for religious reasons. It is an abomination.
No, you don't. You use your human morality pick and choose Biblical quotes that appeal to you (such as the homophobia) and discard the rest (such as the order from Jesus to sell everything you own). You make up the rules as you go along, as it were.
Oh, and Stephen, #322 is
so nominated
.
