DOC's Proof of Christianity Through Irrelavent Fact Attrition

[JoeEllison]

Originally Posted by JoeEllison View Post
What is your point?


Quote from Doc

To inform -- what you do with that information is your business.

When you think about it, isn't that the point of many people who put up threads that are negative to Christianity. I don't see anybody asking them what their point is.






Can you give me let's say 2 examples of someone asking the numerous thread creators who have made many many threads (negative to Christianity) "what's the point" or "so what". And let's say the post must have been made over a week ago. Today is Aug 14.

Notice how DOC is trying to change the subject to other people, other posters, the way others are treated?

If you want to go that route, start another thread and I'm sure we'll all demolish you there as well. In THIS thread, you have plenty to answer for, and the more you avoid it, the more dishonest you appear.

Ask yourself: What Would Jesus Do? Would Jesus be dishonest, or try to dodge questions the way you are doing? Would Jesus claim that his statements are "just throwing stuff out there", or would Jesus pick a position and defend it rationally and passionately?

Jesus would probably join us in pointing out your many, MANY flaws.

 

[skeptifem]

No, no... we atheists put aborted fetuses into a blender for our daily embryonic stem cell smoothies.

Mmmmm... refreshing.

omg i thought i was the only one who did that

 

[joobz]

Can you give me let's say 2 examples of someone asking the numerous thread creators who have made many many threads (negative to Christianity) "what's the point" or "so what". And let's say the post must have been made over a week ago. Today is Aug 14.

After a 2 minute search, I've found three
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=82122
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89412
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=88049

you'll notice all of them have a rambling, illogical, or an unclear OP. as a result, they received many negative points. (and all are anti-christian)

So, I just destroyed your strawman. will you admit error, apologize for the derailing this thread and answer the 'so what' question honestly, or will you ignore this post and repeat your false accusations?

 

[JoeEllison]

After a 2 minute search, I've found three
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=82122
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89412
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=88049

you'll notice all of them have a rambling, illogical, or an unclear OP. as a result, they received many negative points. (and all are anti-christian)

So, I just destroyed your strawman. will you admit error and answer the 'so what' question honestly, or will you ignore this post and repeat your false accusations?

Don't play his game!!

 

[Hokulele]

So, I just destroyed your strawman. will you admit error and answer the 'so what' question honestly, or will you ignore this post and repeat your false accusations?

I vote, start a brand new false accusation, based on something completed unrelated to this thread.

 

[joobz]

Don't play his game!!

You are correct, but I wanted to nip his claim in the bud. Otherwise, he would continue to repeat that nonsense.

It took no time to prove him wrong. So now he's forced to either

1. admit error, apologize and answer the question in the OP

or

2. Ignore my post and prove himself a lying dishonest coward.

 

[DOC]

After a 2 minute search, I've found three
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=82122
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89412
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=88049

you'll notice all of them have a rambling, illogical, or an unclear OP. as a result, they received many negative points. (and all are anti-christian)

So, I just destroyed your strawman. will you admit error, apologize for the derailing this thread and answer the 'so what' question honestly, or will you ignore this post and repeat your false accusations?

Please give the "exact post" where the "so what" or "what's the point" question was asked regarding the "topic of the thread" and make sure the thread's topic is negative to Christianity?

 

[articulett]

Just because someone says that your version of Christianity is unsupported by facts and doesn't seem to be doing you or anyone else much good in the way of tolerance and the like doesn't mean they are speaking negatively about Christianity... anymore than saying similar things about Scientology means that one is speaking negatively about Scientology. Not believing something and seeing those who do believe it as deluded and/or illogical and/or arrogant does not make you a martyr or humble... any more than it makes a Scientologist, Muslim, or rain dance believer a martyr or humble

One could always hope that some pompous believer would come here with some actual measurable evidence for the veracity of his claims or at least some evidence that they are good for something on par with the level of respect the believers seem to imagine they deserve-- but that never happens.

Most just sound like you... they insult skeptics while pretending to be humble and claim to know things they cannot know while calling skeptics arrogant... they mischaracterize and lump all non-believers together while crying foul should someone lump their primitive tale in with Greek Mythology, Mormonism, or some other equally supported (or unsupported) belief system.

Faith and feelings are not good way to explain or understand the facts or the truth... even though your religious leaders told you that they were, DOC. If you want skeptics to take you seriously give us a reason as to why your complaints or claims or proof is better than Muslim claims and the like.

 

[joobz]

Please give the "exact post" where the "so what" or "what's the point" question was asked regarding the "topic of the thread" and make sure the thread's topic is negative to Christianity?

 

[JoeEllison]

I told you he was going to cheat, and turn this thread away from its topic. It is, though, proof positive of his mendacity and lack of integrity.

 

[joobz]

I told you he was going to cheat, and turn this thread away from its topic. It is, though, proof positive of his mendacity and lack of integrity.

You are correct. (As I knew it would be). But I still wanted to give DOC a chance to be honest. I still wanted to give him the chance to prove my OP wrong.

DOC, prove me wrong.
please, prove that central point of my OP is wrong.

 

[wollery]

Please give the "exact post" where the "so what" or "what's the point" question was asked regarding the "topic of the thread" and make sure the thread's topic is negative to Christianity?

Nice dodge! I mean you had to completely not even look at the links to miss the fact that the OPs were asked very early on what the point was. In fact, the second link was asked in the first response, and was most definitely anti-christian.

Grow some cajones DOC, and admit that you were totally and utterly wrong.

 

[articulett]

I told you he was going to cheat, and turn this thread away from its topic. It is, though, proof positive of his mendacity and lack of integrity.

And that's the true value of Christianity-- DOC gets to feel holier-than=thou, humble, and martyred while blinding himself to the traits to his mendacity, lack of integrity, and logical errors.

Religion: Learn to ignore the log protruding from your own eye while calling others to task for the invisible sawdust you are certain must be clouding their vision! Doesn't it just make you want to rush out and join the delusional?

 

[JoeEllison]

And that's the true value of Christianity-- DOC gets to feel holier-than=thou, humble, and martyred while blinding himself to the traits to his mendacity, lack of integrity, and logical errors.

Religion: Learn to ignore the log protruding from your own eye while calling others to task for the invisible sawdust you are certain must be clouding their vision! Doesn't it just make you want to rush out and join the delusional?

The really disgusting part is the hypocrisy. These folks honestly believe that they are better than everyone else, that their attitudes and behavior are inherently better than ours because they have faith in whatever imaginary friend suits their fancy. Then, they turn around and use that delusion of superiority to rationalize and justify the worst sort of intellectual dishonesty, illogical and unfounded assertions, and flat-out lying.

But, you know... "atheists have no morals".

 

[articulett]

The really disgusting part is the hypocrisy. These folks honestly believe that they are better than everyone else, that their attitudes and behavior are inherently better than ours because they have faith in whatever imaginary friend suits their fancy. Then, they turn around and use that delusion of superiority to rationalize and justify the worst sort of intellectual dishonesty, illogical and unfounded assertions, and flat-out lying.

But, you know... "atheists have no morals".

My brother (Catholic) said to my son that he "felt sorry" for me, because I "didn't have a moral compass"... I thought to myself... "I have enough of a moral compass never to say such an idiotic thing to any child about his parent--yet you think nothing of saying such an inane thing to my child despite your supposed religion-inculcated-moral-compass" (as if).

You don't need facts, when you have faith.

 

[UnrepentantSinner]

Most just sound like you... they insult skeptics while pretending to be humble and claim to know things they cannot know while calling skeptics arrogant... they mischaracterize and lump all non-believers together while crying foul should someone lump their primitive tale in with Greek Mythology, Mormonism, or some other equally supported (or unsupported) belief system.

And that's the true value of Christianity-- DOC gets to feel holier-than=thou, humble, and martyred while blinding himself to the traits to his mendacity, lack of integrity, and logical errors.

Religion: Learn to ignore the log protruding from your own eye while calling others to task for the invisible sawdust you are certain must be clouding their vision! Doesn't it just make you want to rush out and join the delusional?

Have you lost your sense of irony because of your burning hatred?

 

[JoeEllison]

My brother (Catholic) said to my son that he "felt sorry" for me, because I "didn't have a moral compass"... I thought to myself... "I have enough of a moral compass never to say such an idiotic thing to any child about his parent--yet you think nothing of saying such an inane thing to my child despite your supposed religion-inculcated-moral-compass" (as if).

You don't need facts, when you have faith.

No need for facts, or common sense, or compassion, or politeness, or even basic human decency... at least not towards people who don't share the faith.

 

[articulett]

Scientology gets a lot of people of drugs...

I wonder if that makes it more likely to be true to DOC?

 

[articulett]

Have you lost your sense of irony because of your burning hatred?

The irony is in tact. The hatred is a figment of your imagination. Time for your own reality check... your armchair analysis fails once again. (I assure you that if anyone whom I find insightful--and there are many on this forum--should assert that they sense what you imagine in me, then I will consider such conjecture.)

 

[JoeEllison]

Have you lost your sense of irony because of your burning hatred?

Maybe you should check a mirror, chum?