Squibs here...Squibs there...Squibs everywhere!!!

Thunder

Banned
T
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
34,918
9-11 Deniers love to talk about the magical "squibs" as proof of a controlled demolition. There were supposedly 5 or 6 squibs...per tower.

Are they trying to tell us that a 110 story building, that had charges set on almost every floor, only had squibs on 6 floors? Does that make ANY sense?

If charges were used to take out the HUGE core beams, the force from such an explosions would not have exploded out one window..it would have taken out the whole side of the building.

Instead, what do we see? Air being pushed out the path of least resistance. Probably the one window that wasn't fastened as right as the others.

6 Squibs....evidence of CD?...Give me a break.
 
well their sekrit ops only had a black out and weekends, so they couldnt have gotten the explosives on EVERY floor...lol

TAM:)
 
parky76 said:
6 Squibs....evidence of CD?...Give me a break.
Click to expand...

It would be more effective if they used one giant squib instead. They are used in demolition all the time.

215546TYbx_w.jpg
 
Reality Believer said:
It would be more effective if they used one giant squib instead. They are used in demolition all the time.

[qimg]http://www.worth1000.com/entries/215500/215546TYbx_w.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

They are only legendary creatures...lol

TAM:)
 
Notice also that twoofers never look into what structural supports existed where their precious "squibs" appear.
 
There was only a blackout on one tower. what about the others?

Imagine all that wiring to be kept secret.
 
Albie:

Thats amazing man, you registered in 2004, and this is your first post...welcome to posting on the forum...lol

TAM:)
 
There's also the small matter of "squibs" being small explosives most commonly used as special effects and never used in controlled demolition.

But then that never stopped them with thermite.
 
Yeah, I could never understand why the conspiracy liars latched on to the term "squib". The amount of explosive used in a squib is very, very small and they are almost universally used to simulate a bullet hit or ricochet.

In addition, there is no such thing as a radio-controlled squib. They are taped to an actor's body, the detonator cord runs down the actor's pants and connects to a control box called a nail board. When each nail is struck it will trigger the according hit, good for machine gun fire.

So maybe one of our conspiracy friends can tell us, who was operating the nail board on 9/11 and where were they located? Certainly not in the building. Gosh that's alot of det cord.
 
Last edited:
Has there been any attempt at all from the CT:s to produce some sort of schematic over how the WTC supposedly was wired and what detonators they supposedly used? The only answer you get is thet there was a blackout and GWB:s brother was connected with the security company.
Heiwa once tried to answer that question by implementing "high-tech technology". But a real CT is of course uninterested in the "hows".
Is there any article anywhere about this?
 
Last edited:
parky76 said:
9-11 Deniers love to talk about the magical "squibs" as proof of a controlled demolition. There were supposedly 5 or 6 squibs...per tower.

Are they trying to tell us that a 110 story building, that had charges set on almost every floor, only had squibs on 6 floors? Does that make ANY sense?

If charges were used to take out the HUGE core beams, the force from such an explosions would not have exploded out one window..it would have taken out the whole side of the building.

Instead, what do we see? Air being pushed out the path of least resistance. Probably the one window that wasn't fastened as right as the others.

6 Squibs....evidence of CD?...Give me a break.
Click to expand...

Probably you mean that 6 squibs where not synchronized with the other ones, after a while you don't see it because of the ejected debris and dust around it. Do you not realize that the demolition zone is a collection of squibs ?
 
Zorglub said:
Has there been any attempt at all from the CT:s to produce some sort of scematic over how the WTC supposedly was wired and what detonators they supposedly used? The only answer you get is thet there was a blackout and GWB:s brother was connected with the security company.
Heiwa once tried to answer that quesion by implementing "high-tech technology". But a real CT is of course uninterested in the "hows".
Is there any articel anywhere about this?
Click to expand...

I have asked this exact question in a thread on this site within the last 2 days...guess what...no replies from the CTists...hmmmm....I wonder why.

TAM:)
 
parky76 said:
9-11 Deniers love to talk about the magical "squibs" as proof of a controlled demolition. There were supposedly 5 or 6 squibs...per tower.

Are they trying to tell us that a 110 story building, that had charges set on almost every floor, only had squibs on 6 floors? Does that make ANY sense?

If charges were used to take out the HUGE core beams, the force from such an explosions would not have exploded out one window..it would have taken out the whole side of the building.

Instead, what do we see? Air being pushed out the path of least resistance. Probably the one window that wasn't fastened as right as the others.

6 Squibs....evidence of CD?...Give me a break.
Click to expand...

It wasn't squibs it was squids.

A hexapod of giant squids destroyed the towers.

Two for each building.
 
einsteen said:
http://members.lycos.nl/einsteen/forum/wtc2collapse.html

http://i18.tinypic.com/62xt9ub.jpg

Looks like a squib is nothing different than the effect on top

demolition wave = collection of squibs, the squib is simply an element of it.

A possible debunking is indeed that everything is caused by air pressed out due to the collapsing mass, I'm no supporter of that.
Click to expand...


Why would the so called "Squibbs" increase in expelled energy while expanding as shown in the videos? Explosives would lose explosive energy as the "squibb" expanded.
 
Zorglub said:
Has there been any attempt at all from the CT:s to produce some sort of schematic over how the WTC supposedly was wired and what detonators they supposedly used? The only answer you get is thet there was a blackout and GWB:s brother was connected with the security company.
Heiwa once tried to answer that question by implementing "high-tech technology". But a real CT is of course uninterested in the "hows".
Is there any article anywhere about this?
Click to expand...

Here's how it's always been explained to me:

CT: There was a power outage before 9/11 when the buildings were wired.
ME: But according to the evidence you used for the power outage it was only 1/2 of one of the building that was out that weekend. How do you explain the other 3/4?
CT: Yeah well what about WTC7?

I think that's sufficient...
 
CHF said:
Notice also that twoofers never look into what structural supports existed where their precious "squibs" appear.
Click to expand...

Thats a lie. The recent Ross video lecture goes into detail about the location of squibs and relation to core structures.

PS is your leader accepting the Ross disputation?
 
einsteen said:
http://members.lycos.nl/einsteen/forum/wtc2collapse.html

http://i18.tinypic.com/62xt9ub.jpg

Looks like a squib is nothing different than the effect on top

demolition wave = collection of squibs, the squib is simply an element of it.

A possible debunking is indeed that everything is caused by air pressed out due to the collapsing mass, I'm no supporter of that.
Click to expand...

You know what would be cool, if one of the CTers could explain the dynamics of the resulting air pressure caused by the collapse (with demo or without). In other words, CTers like to poopoo the idea that the squibs were caused by air pressure, but they've never produced anything to show what the affects of air pressure should have looked like.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom