An email from a Conspiracy theorist, and I have no idea how

[twinstead]

Don't forget Heiwa that this would also have to fool thousands of people watching in person.

 

[~enigma~]

Don't forget Heiwa that this would also have to fool thousands of people watching in person.

Did anybody here think about why this PDOPE sock chose the screenname Heiwa? Anybody here know japanese? Apparenty PDOPE has a Japanese/English dictionary. The translation is peace. How much more obvious does it have to be?

 

[Heiwa]

You have to use your head. The nose did not exit. The nose of the aircraft is made of plastic, fiberglass. It was destroyed as the aircraft crashed into the building. The people that say the nose exited the building do not have much knowledge or the logical reasoning to figure out anything. Sorry you have fallen for the dumbest ideas on record. You should finish school and stop falling for idiots making up lies about 9/11. Nose, that is funny. Not too smart, but funny as in ha ha, and strange.

Socialservice maintains that the nose exited WTC2 and that the reason for that is sloppy copy/paste of a pixel nose! And if a pixel nose exited, what entered WTC2? A pixel plane?
So it seems that it is possible to fake live transmissions, actually just add one picture on top of another and modify as required. By googling around a little I have found a lot of links confirming this suggestion by socialservice.
So the no 'real' plane theory may have some substance. It was a pixel plane! And then you wonder what gangsters have the opportunity to deceive us with pixel planes.

 

[beachnut]

Socialservice maintains that the nose exited WTC2 and that the reason for that is sloppy copy/paste of a pixel nose! And if a pixel nose exited, what entered WTC2? A pixel plane?
So it seems that it is possible to fake live transmissions, actually just add one picture on top of another and modify as required. By googling around a little I have found a lot of links confirming this suggestion by socialservice.
So the no 'real' plane theory may have some substance. It was a pixel plane! And then you wonder what gangsters have the opportunity to deceive us with pixel planes.

That is not a rational thought on this topic? What you have posted has no support in reality. (eyes that saw aircraft)

The noses of the planes on 9/11 are made of plastic. They were destroyed first. No they did not fake the planes. Real people died on 9/11 in the 4 aircraft. Only idiots believe this junk you have posted. People saw the planes hit the WTC with their eyes. Fake planes proved wrong on 9/11 2001. How long have you had this false idea?

The big clue is!; thousands of people saw the planes on 9/11 with their very own set of MARK1, mother nature issued, eyeballs. Therefore your fake pixel plane is insane. Would you say, only idiots persist with the fake/pixel aircraft video fake junk?

 

[Heiwa]

That is not a rational thought on this topic? What you have posted has no support in reality. (eyes that saw aircraft)

The noses of the planes on 9/11 are made of plastic. They were destroyed first. No they did not fake the planes. Real people died on 9/11 in the 4 aircraft. Only idiots believe this junk you have posted. People saw the planes hit the WTC with their eyes. Fake planes proved wrong on 9/11 2001. How long have you had this false idea?

The big clue is!; thousands of people saw the planes on 9/11 with their very own set of MARK1, mother nature issued, eyeballs. Therefore your fake pixel plane is insane. Would you say, only idiots persist with the fake/pixel aircraft video fake junk?

But why can FBI and FEMA not produce one piece of documented wreckage belonging to the said planes? Yes - they have produced various photos of scrap but no evidence that that scrap came from the alleged planes. I find it extraordinary.

 

[Pardalis]

Did anybody here think about why this PDOPE sock chose the screenname Heiwa? Anybody here know japanese? Apparenty PDOPE has a Japanese/English dictionary. The translation is peace. How much more obvious does it have to be?

The problem is I think PDoh is not a no-planer, a no-brainer of course but not a no-planer.

 

[ref]

Socialservice maintains that the nose exited WTC2 and that the reason for that is sloppy copy/paste of a pixel nose! And if a pixel nose exited, what entered WTC2? A pixel plane?
So it seems that it is possible to fake live transmissions, actually just add one picture on top of another and modify as required. By googling around a little I have found a lot of links confirming this suggestion by socialservice.
So the no 'real' plane theory may have some substance. It was a pixel plane! And then you wonder what gangsters have the opportunity to deceive us with pixel planes.

Did they carry all the plane parts to the scene then, if no planes hit the towers? Nobody saw anybody carrying engine or fuselage parts before the attacks. Every eyewitness on ground was fooled as well. That's strange. They found DNA of the hijackers and passengers on the scene, well that's strange too. How does your pixel explain that?

 

[ref]

Did anybody here think about why this PDOPE sock chose the screenname Heiwa? Anybody here know japanese? Apparenty PDOPE has a Japanese/English dictionary. The translation is peace. How much more obvious does it have to be?

Unfortunately, this guy is Anders Björkman, Swedish born theorist.

 

[Zorglub]

But why can FBI and FEMA not produce one piece of documented wreckage belonging to the said planes? Yes - they have produced various photos of scrap but no evidence that that scrap came from the alleged planes. I find it extraordinary.

Why on earth should they confirm that the debris and various nuts and bolts that without a doubt are pieces of an airplane, belonged to exactly these two airplanes?
Two planes crashes into WTC 1 & 2. Wreckage from two planes are found. You really think someone should have said: - Hey boss. Wait! Are we sure these pieces that clearly belongs to a plane belongs to the two planes we saw fly into WTC?
If hundred of planes went missing on 9/11 I would understand that question.

 

[beachnut]

But why can FBI and FEMA not produce one piece of documented wreckage belonging to the said planes? Yes - they have produced various photos of scrap but no evidence that that scrap came from the alleged planes. I find it extraordinary.

FEMA? Why does FEMA need to do anything about crimes?

The FBI has parts from the planes. The sad part of your post is we know the planes were the planes, 11, 175, 77, and 93, because we found the DNA from the people, you know the kids, the women, the men, the crew, where each plane crashed. You are one real sad person if you have to believe the lies of 9/11 truth. 9/11 truth is made of lairs making up lies about 9/11. The people who got on the planes on 9/11 were found in each location where the jet they flew in were crashed on purpose by 19 terrorist.

What will be your next disrespectful post of junk ideas on 9/11. The more I think about your post, the more I think you are a sick individual.

 

[Unfit4Command]

But why can FBI and FEMA not produce one piece of documented wreckage belonging to the said planes? Yes - they have produced various photos of scrap but no evidence that that scrap came from the alleged planes. I find it extraordinary.

So the DNA and personal effects of the passengers doesn't prove that the said planes crashed?


Do you believe that the said planes were secretly landed somewhere? Can you produce any evidence of this if you do?

 

[twinstead]

What I find extraordinary is the mental gymnastics some people will go through to keep their fantasy theories alive.

Of course there was plane wreckage found, but are we sure it was from the planes in question? LOL what kind of a question is that?

What's sad, is the next backflip Heiwa would perform for our pleasure is if there were a report that matched up plane parts with the actual flights involved. Yup. He would claim they were faked.

Just like I'm sure he thinks the DNA evidence was planted...

So, what exactly is the use in debating someone who simply changes his theory on the fly to get around contradicting evidence?

The mojo of the incredibly morphing theory is strong...

 

[Zorglub]

What I find extraordinary is the mental gymnastics some people will go through to keep their fantasy theories alive.

So, what exactly is the use in debating someone who simply changes his theory on the fly to get around contradicting evidence?

You came up with the answer yourself It´s extraordinarily fascinating. Like a puzzle.
And at the end of the day I can go to sleep assured that no matter how comfuzed and illogical I am there are those that beats me.

 

[Belz...]

Socialservice maintains that the nose exited WTC2 and that the reason for that is sloppy copy/paste of a pixel nose!

So what ? Who cares what he "maintains" ?

What exits 2 WTC IS NOT the nose. Stop watching poor quality youtube videos.

And if a pixel nose exited, what entered WTC2? A pixel plane?

Nope.

So it seems that it is possible to fake live transmissions, actually just add one picture on top of another and modify as required.

LIVE ?

By googling around a little I have found a lot of links confirming this suggestion by socialservice.

Yeah. If you google enough you'll find a lot of links confirming everything you want to.

So the no 'real' plane theory may have some substance.

No, there was THOUSANDS of witnesses.

But why can FBI and FEMA not produce one piece of documented wreckage belonging to the said planes? Yes - they have produced various photos of scrap but no evidence that that scrap came from the alleged planes.

So you see the evidence but it's not good enough for you ?

I find it extraordinary.

Argument from incredulity.

 

[T.A.M.]

Heiwa, like all twoofies, assume that if they have not been given a personal look at the items/parts, or if there is not a publicly accessable record of matching the parts to said planes, than the FBI/FEMA have not done so. See in their world, ordinary people have access to all the information in a criminal investigation via googleforensics...lol

Welcome to the forum Zorglub.

TAM

 

[RedIbis]

Heiwa, like all twoofies, assume that if they have not been given a personal look at the items/parts, or if there is not a publicly accessable record of matching the parts to said planes, than the FBI/FEMA have not done so. See in their world, ordinary people have access to all the information in a criminal investigation via googleforensics...lol

Welcome to the forum Zorglub.

TAM

So we can conclude that in your world if FEMA/FBI didn't produce any serially charged plane parts then they must have them.

This reminds me of the logic that since we didn't find any WMDs in Iraq this is proof that they are hidden.

 

[Panoply_Prefect]

Heiwa, like all twoofies, assume that if they have not been given a personal look at the items/parts, or if there is not a publicly accessable record of matching the parts to said planes, than the FBI/FEMA have not done so.

Or to be more precise, if there is not an online internet accessable record, they dont exist. If its not on Google, its a coverup.

EDIT: I belive I need more precisison: If there is not an free of charge, online internet accessable record. Truthers still argue that the NIST models are kept a secret, when in fact if you cough up money for it, you'll get it.

/S

 

[DavidJames]

So we can conclude that in your world if FEMA/FBI didn't produce any serially charged plane parts then they must have them.

This reminds me of the logic that since we didn't find any WMDs in Iraq this is proof that they are hidden.

That's not logic, that's a straw man.

But I wouldn't expect a CTists to know the difference.

 

[T.A.M.]

So we can conclude that in your world if FEMA/FBI didn't produce any serially charged plane parts then they must have them.

This reminds me of the logic that since we didn't find any WMDs in Iraq this is proof that they are hidden.

No Red, That is not correct.

For example, if by court order, the FBI failed to produce such things, than I would conclude they likely do not have this evidence. My point, is that just because a bunch of googleinvestigators can't find such things on the public internet, and just because such information is not available via FOIA requests, does not mean they do not have the evidence you speak of. Some things are considered not publicly available, and evidence in a criminal case is such a case.

I am sorry that my logic reminds you of something so unrelated to my point, but I guess you did not understand my point.

TAM

 

[Heiwa]

So the DNA and personal effects of the passengers doesn't prove that the said planes crashed?


Do you believe that the said planes were secretly landed somewhere? Can you produce any evidence of this if you do?

No, DNA and personal effects of the passengers do not prove that the planes crashed (the could be planted). Only documented and identified wreckage parts of each plane can evidently prove that the plane in question crashed. Evident, isn't it? Any good patriot should agree!