• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

An email from a Conspiracy theorist, and I have no idea how

Sometimes some people at my coffee house wonder if the US cowboys see what's ahead of the ears of their horses.

I'm always amused at statements like this, because the people who make them invariably turn around and call Americans arrogant.
 
You are quite right even if OT. The US moral majority however needs a little shaking up. There is a real world outside Springfield.

You, however aren't really shaking up the "US moral majority", but pissing on the victims of 911 and their living relatives.

But you wouldn't know the difference, from your desktop warrior pad way over in France.

/S
 
There are many indications on the other hand that the global collapse was initiated/caused by control demolition by remote control and that the also the undamaged section above was blown up in the air by controlled demolition before hitting the ground.

Yup, somehow these many "indications" have escaped the worlds leading structural engineers, but the batSh**t paranoid nutters all declare it blindingly obvious.


The lack of forensic examination of the tower steel structure wreckage is frightening.

Not nearly as frightening as your complete detachment from reality.

Heiwa is just Swedish for Ace Baker.
 
How the F&*K can you blow up a 20 storey piece of building, in mid air, as it is falling to earth, through controlled demolition...lol

Please Heiwa, give us at least a bare bones description of how they did that one...that one is almost as good as the no-planer's Star Wars Weaponry...

TAM:)
 
How the F&*K can you blow up a 20 storey piece of building, in mid air, as it is falling to earth, through controlled demolition...lol

Please Heiwa, give us at least a bare bones description of how they did that one...that one is almost as good as the no-planer's Star Wars Weaponry...

TAM:)

Sorry cannot answer. My US sources seem to have disappeared.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6377
 
Last edited:
I don't want sources for this, I want you, as an "Engineer" to describe to me, how they blew up the twenty story top section of the WTC AS IT WAS FALLING TO EARTH via CD?

TAM:)
 
This reminds me of geggy's "controlled demolition made to look like a fake collapse but which was in fact a real collapse in part because it looks so much like one" theory.

Truthers trying to conciliate their CD theory with the overwhelming evidence that the towers fell by structural collapse... What a pathetic sight.
 
I don't want sources for this, I want you, as an "Engineer" to describe to me, how they blew up the twenty story top section of the WTC AS IT WAS FALLING TO EARTH via CD?

TAM:)

Pls read first the link. Second, I am glad that you agree that they blew up the top section and now wonder how. I assume they did it it by remote control. Like the rest of the tower. BTW, who are they you are referring to?
 
You, however aren't really shaking up the "US moral majority", but pissing on the victims of 911 and their living relatives.

But you wouldn't know the difference, from your desktop warrior pad way over in France.

/S

OT and moral rubbish. Start to think, SLOB.
 
Fire proof detonation charges that survived an airplane impact, intense multistorey fires, and the collapse of the building below it. A seperate detonation circuit just for the top portion...so the airplane had to be dead on, or the wiring for the detonation for the top portion would have been severed.

Come on man...admit you don't really believe that shaite do you...REALLY (cue south park character).

TAM:)
 
Pls read first the link. Second, I am glad that you agree that they blew up the top section and now wonder how. I assume they did it it by remote control. Like the rest of the tower. BTW, who are they you are referring to?

I agreed to nothing. I am asking you to explain your theory on how they did this. I find your suggestion that they blew up the top section seperately, as it was falling, to be more insane than most of the no-planer CGI fakery crap...and that is saying something.

Its called "playing along" to hear your further explanation.

TAM:)
 
your link is OT with respect to the top portion being detonated independently.

TAM:)
 
Start to think, SLOB.

Yes. I. Will. Here. Is. My. Theory:

Fire bad.

Now, for the question you've so far dodged:

stateofgrace said:
Now that is a simple summary, please offer up your own, do not have a go at mine, after all I am just a sheep who buys into anything, so why don't you tell , in your own words what happened?

An as simple summary as stateofgrace's will suffice.

/S
 
I agreed to nothing. I am asking you to explain your theory on how they did this. I find your suggestion that they blew up the top section seperately, as it was falling, to be more insane than most of the no-planer CGI fakery crap...and that is saying something.

Its called "playing along" to hear your further explanation.

TAM:)

Strange developments of this discussion about the WTC2 collapse that could not take place according to NIST descriptions (the subject). Suggest you start a new thread how they did it. My US sources seems to have disappeared as per some emergency instructions. Do you care about that?
 
Strange developments of this discussion about the WTC2 collapse that could not take place according to NIST descriptions (the subject). Suggest you start a new thread how they did it. My US sources seems to have disappeared as per some emergency instructions. Do you care about that?

You are the one who made the statement that they (whoever you feel they are...NWO, USG, whatever) blew up the top section of the WTC via remote control, after it had begun falling toward the ground.

You posited the question, dont then tell me to start a new thread on it...answer the question, provide us with your engineering education behind you, on how they carried this out...or else dodge it again like a coward.

I hope no harm have come to your sources, whomever they are, but no I really do not care that they have "mysteriously" disappeared.


TAM:)
 
Make a better effort. Or try at least.

Its a perfectly viable, if simplified theory. There's really nothing wrong with it, and all the evidence points to that.

Wheras all you have done is try to claim TAM was agreeing with something he was not, a cheap debating trick if I have ever seen one.

Anyone else starting to smell :socks:?
 
You are the one who made the statement that they (whoever you feel they are...NWO, USG, whatever) blew up the top section of the WTC via remote control, after it had begun falling toward the ground.

You posited the question, dont then tell me to start a new thread on it...answer the question, provide us with your engineering education behind you, on how they carried this out...or else dodge it again like a coward.

I hope no harm have come to your sources, whomever they are, but no I really do not care that they have "mysteriously" disappeared.


TAM:)

What was wrong with the previous answer? Remote control. For details - sorry - my US advisors cannot be reached. Apparently a result of http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html .

I think it is better we stop this discussion here. You have all proven you cannot see beyond the tall ears of your donkeys. Bye, bye.
 

Back
Top Bottom