• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

was OKC an inside job?

i consider the side of the street where cars are parked, a parking lot

anyway ive looked at the science and this seems pretty open and shut to me. the bomb was close to the support collumn and when 1 support collumn collapsed it brang a few others down with it causing the collapse

other buildings werent close enough to the force to have their support collumns knocked

makes sense to me now
 
i consider the side of the street where cars are parked, a parking lot

Why? It's the street. Parking lots are lots, off the street. They are called lots for that reason. Don't do that anymore, or at least say it out loud. People will laugh.

anyway ive looked at the science and this seems pretty open and shut to me. the bomb was close to the support collumn and when 1 support collumn collapsed it brang a few others down with it causing the collapse

other buildings werent close enough to the force to have their support collumns knocked

makes sense to me now

Sorry, but you don't get off that easy for having wound up Revo over something you could have looked up yourself.

Drop and give me 50.

:D
 
You have conflicting report on the time line from one source. That's a little weak don't you think. Would you like to get convicted on that?


One source? It's a video!

If it was security cam footage of him robbing a bank do you think he would get convicted?
 
I'm pretty sure I've heard about that video, and that it's subsequently been proven the man in it is not McVeigh. Just a close resemblance. But I won't swear to that. I'm trying to find info, but Google's all dirty with CT links. The spiders have gone stupid, I think.
 
"The video was released by Bill Bean, a film producer who has suffered intense surveillance and harassment since taking the footage, and is the subject of a February 2007 Hustler Magazine feature story..." from article.
 
No, none of us can read. Or write. How we post here, and respond to posts, is an inside job.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_5604469a1525c5cd3.jpg[/qimg]

Just wondering, what other buildings near the blast should have been equally as damaged? I'm looking really hard, here, but can't seem to find any.
The building in the bottom right hand corner of your photo had debris feom the Murrah building on its roof. Clear evidence of the blast coming out from within the Murrah bldg.
Hey, dont take my word for it, even Congress knows. Some retired general sent them a full report.
Don't ask me for references, look and learn.
 
The building in the bottom right hand corner of your photo had debris feom the Murrah building on its roof. Clear evidence of the blast coming out from within the Murrah bldg.

That's a funny definition of 'clear'.

Hey, dont take my word for it, even Congress knows. Some retired general sent them a full report.
Don't ask me for references, look and learn.

The military is not immune to having nutters in its ranks.

Sucks for you that McVeigh admitted he did it, eh?
 
The building in the bottom right hand corner of your photo had debris feom the Murrah building on its roof. Clear evidence of the blast coming out from within the Murrah bldg.
Hey, dont take my word for it,

Hadn't planned on it. Really.

The blast from the truck was sufficient to cause what you see there. A Catholic church was also destroyed, as well as hundreds of other buildings damaged. All of it caused by that truck bomb. Period.

I'm not going to ask you for the evidence we both know you don't have, nor am I going to care about any argument you make, because it's just not worth your time or mine. You've a moderated thread to tend to, and I'm certainly not going to divert you from it.
 
Revolutionary91: In light of the fact that the military have been known to rent vehicles, has your opinion of the photograph of the Ryder truck in the military base changed at all?
 

Back
Top Bottom