How about actual references to studies that we can read?
And while I don't believe that I know everything about the moon and human behavior, I do know a lot about the design and proper interpretation of such studies.
As is the case with almost everything published on the Internets, the raw data isn't available, just the conclusions. You claim "
I do know a lot about the design and proper interpretation of such studies", which would be quite cool, if it is true.
So, because such a study is easy to do, based on evidence actually being available, and abundant, what would be the design, that would stand up to your '
proper interpretation'? I'm not being funny, (I know, it sounds like it, but I'm not, really).
You have data, (hospital admissions, emergency room treatments, police logs, prison logs, jail logs, etc), and you have the phases of the moon. Both of these go back a long time, and they exist all over the world.
What would be the procedure for looking at this issue? I mean, it doesn't sound that difficult a problem. You compare numbers with dates. What would be the problem? The studies that claim there is no correlation don't provide their data either, so what does
proper interpretation mean here?
What needs to be done to prevent any bias or errors? And if the data was available, could you do a study on it that would stand up to peer review? Or even better, make it so anyone looking at the data could see for themselves the truth of the matter?
Wait a second, are you backing this tripe?
I'm a skeptic. I like to see evidence before I make up my mind. Something like the full moon and crime, it is an obvious issue that could be researched based on evidence.
As I said before, an expensive study was done to determine WHY there was more crime on or near the full moon. They found it was the ability to see at night, because of the extra light, led to more criminal activity on nights where there was a full moon.
And no, they didn't publish the data. They concluded it was the extra light of the moon helping criminals commit crimes. The study was not to see if there was more crime, it was to find out WHY there was more crime.
A police log and a moon chart can show the relationship between crime and the moon. What I think is funny, is that some people think it is the moon causing the crime. And that some people think there is no correlation between the phase of the moon, and crime.
While researching this, I was surprised that there is a connection to bleeding after surgery and the moon phase. This was based on a scientific study, which set out to prove there was no connection. That can't be explained by extra light at night. And again, the data is not published.
Too bad Randi doesn't include this in the $MDC. But even Randi knows better than making that claim. It is too easy to prove.